It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
No, the country did not reject progressive policies. Less than half voted for Trump. That is not a wholesale rejection.
then explain the gop house and gop senate please?
gop executive branch.......check won in this election
gop house.....check won in this election
gop senate....check won in this election
yes the country did reject progressive policies
oh and soon to come gop supreme court(that will last for decades)
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: introvert
...we find ourselves in a bad position where we could take a huge step backwards in regards to personal liberty and constitutional protections. And we have yet to discuss the ramifications of his economic/tax ideas.
I don't see how this is different than when we faced the GWB and Obama presidencies.
I thought Trump was voted in because he would be the change the American people wanted. Apparently they forgot to look at the ideas he was touting to see that he would be just another politician that would keep the country going down the wrong track.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: network dude
I don't know what you are talking about. I never said he should be arrested for being president. I said I hope he was lying when he said he would put ultra-conservatives on the Supreme Court.
Obama should have been working his butt off to fill Scalia's seat and not stumping for Hillary and hoping to hold the woman-vote hostage with the vacancy.
How about just a moderate judge who likes the 2nd amendment, but is also pro-choice and believes in civil rights for minorities? I'd be okay with that, but that is not what Trump has promised to do.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: kaylaluv
How about just a moderate judge who likes the 2nd amendment, but is also pro-choice and believes in civil rights for minorities? I'd be okay with that, but that is not what Trump has promised to do.
How about why didnt obama do this? Obama had the opportunity did he not?
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: introvert
no but perhaps sanctioning mexico for all the illegal immigrants we have absorbed and thus paid for through Tax may be a great idea, and force them to clean their #ing # country.
perhaps you do not understand how presidential elections work?
originally posted by: introvert
I don't think you guys understand what is going on here.
So I can understand why a lot of people are concerned
it sure looks like you are trying to justify what they are doing.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: network dude
I don't know what you are talking about. I never said he should be arrested for being president. I said I hope he was lying when he said he would put ultra-conservatives on the Supreme Court.
Obama should have been working his butt off to fill Scalia's seat and not stumping for Hillary and hoping to hold the woman-vote hostage with the vacancy.
He could have worked until he literally had no butt left, and the obstructionist Congress would not have cooperated.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: kaylaluv
How about just a moderate judge who likes the 2nd amendment, but is also pro-choice and believes in civil rights for minorities? I'd be okay with that, but that is not what Trump has promised to do.
How about why didnt obama do this? Obama had the opportunity did he not?
He has nominated a moderate judge. Congress won't budge.