It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: rickymouse
His wife will look very good in the White House. The color will look good on her.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: TechniXcality
You served who, exactly, in war? The people?
No. I am afraid not. You served globalist agendas way above the pay grade of your commanding officers commanding officer, some of them above the pay grade of the presidents you served under. You believed in what you were doing while you were doing it no doubt, but can you say with hindsight in mind, that what you did served your nations people?
And further, you are simply wrong to lump all SJW together. There are social justice warriors out there advocating for your right to bear arms. There are social justice warriors out there advocating for your right to have and voice opinions which are not popular. There are social justice warriors insisting on maintaining all manner of rights that you have under the constitution, but you do not call them social justice warriors, because for some reason, you fail to identify them as such.
And no, nihilist persons do not generally get motivated to change what is around them to suit their agenda, because nhilism is a total lack of an agenda, which is patently obvious if you look into nhilism as a way of life. I know plenty of nhilists, and not a one of them gives a brass plated damn for politics of any sort, left or right, capitalist or communist.
originally posted by: Grambler
Sorry to interject into this discussion but I found it interesting.
You seem to criticize Tech definition of social justice warriors which is fine. Labels are always difficult. But it seems in the context of this thread Tech is discussing the regressive people that seek to stifle all free speech and deem everyone who disagrees with them as evil bigots. This wide spread mindest has partially driven people to put Trump in the white house.
You say social justice warriors are what this country has fought for, I disagree.
One of the most important rights in this country is the right to free speech. SJW's or whatever you want to call them, the group of people that seek to stifle all discussion that disagrees with their far left agenda are exactly the type of demgogues this country sought to escape from.
You want to discuss trans rights, thats fine by me. But to call anyone who disagrees with you a bigot and seek to shut down their speech, that is not what this country is about. Just look at campuses all across this country,; safe spaces, conservatives speakers shut down, etc. Look at how many people criticized anyone who disagreed with Obama as a racist. Look at how they said if you voted for Trump you were a bigot.
This is the mindset that has angered so many people, and drove them to Trump.
You criticize Tech for lumping SJW's together, yet you lump him and all soldiers together and "globalists" together saying he was unwittingly fighting for their agenda. Well many of those globalists, such as George Soros, are the ones behind the finacing of these SJW's that seek to divide us all and stifle free speech.
So maybe you are as guilty of fighting for a "globalists" agenda by attacking Tech for his stance on SJW's as you claim he is for joining the military.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: imjack
I am sure that there are Republican voters out there who not only know the thesaurus inside out, but use it correctly as well. However, in this case, you may be somewhat close to the mark.
originally posted by: DAVID64
The whining and crying that Liberals are doing now, is the very reason Trump won. We were sick of hearing that if you didn't bow to the "Cause of the Day" crowd, you are a racist, bigot.....well, you know them all. Liberals thought that they could bully and shame their way in to power and they just found out how wrong they were.