Marijuana wins big on election night

a reply to: ColdWisdom

Well, most places have banned all indoor smoking so I cannot imagine that would easily come to pass. But it would make for an interesting dining concept: get baked, then the baked stuff comes out.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: ColdWisdom

Well, most places have banned all indoor smoking so I cannot imagine that would easily come to pass. But it would make for an interesting dining concept: get baked, then the baked stuff comes out.

Why does everyone automatically go to "smoking"?

There are things called vaporizers.......they've been around for decades.

originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: Kali74

I bathe in the tears of liberals and SJWS

Come on, we were nice to you when you were down. Don't make me regret that.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Or banks, which forces you to file your taxes with paper money with the IRS which, of course, fines you for.

Yeah, it's certainly a Mongolian Cluster Copulation, and one of the things that surprises me, it's entrepreneurship, something we should be supporting, and it certainly stimulates the economy which we definitely can use.

This is what blows my mind about the hold outs resisting it. The rally cry of the right is the loss of manufacturing jobs for working class white people. Well here is a growing manufacturing industry that has HEAVY support from young white people (as well as the rest of the demographics in this country of course). Since it is brand new, you can't say that it is being stifled by regulation. So it is economist's dream in that regard. From all perspectives it looks like a right wing dream to support. Yet they don't do it. Odd.

Hell. Even the money argument doesn't make sense with how much money this industry is ALREADY raking in.

originally posted by: AlbanArthur
Why does everyone automatically go to "smoking"?

There are things called vaporizers.......they've been around for decades.

Those are banned in my state as well.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Big Tobacco owns New Jersey then.

a reply to: TechniXcality

Can you take your gloating out of my thread? There are plenty of threads for that you can go participate in. If you bothered to read the thread you'd notice we aren't being partisan in it.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: AlbanArthur
Why does everyone automatically go to "smoking"?

There are things called vaporizers.......they've been around for decades.

Those are banned in my state as well.

Wow. Really? That is dumb. I'd prefer to be around someone using a vaporizer to imbibe tobacco rather than smoking... And by banning them even if you can't smoke indoors, that means I will be guaranteed to be around people smoking when I'm around someone doing tobacco.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

I totally understand, it impacts me personally.

Our company was sitting on a large purchase order, pending this law passing, for LED lighting for our largest distributor in Massachusetts, I happily forwarded that bad boy on this morning. The end user spent big money on these and will be employing people in their new endeavor.

originally posted by: Kali74
We're gonna need it.

#deadcampaignwalking is a little outdated. You should freshen it up a bit.

May I suggest #hesmypresidentnow as it's trending.

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
Big Tobacco owns New Jersey then.

They own every state, wait until you see the laws that got passed recently come into effect.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

This is why Chris Christie being in Trump's administration worries me...

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Just to be clear, you cannot use them in bar/restaurant, you can own one at home.

a reply to: kaylaluv

you were and I care about you but that was into regards to alcoholism... this is in regards to a rampant liberal SJW ideology that is in its death throws and I am glad to see it happening, and so should you

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Big Tobacco owns New Jersey then.

Not to mention Fat Head Christie.

a reply to: AlbanArthur

Christie is not involved with Federal law, the Tobacco Lobby vigorously presses for support from both sides of the aisle and gets it in spades.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Well that's better. I thought you were implying that they were banned altogether. I still don't agree with them being banned in bars or indoors though. That vapor dissipates rather quickly.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

I am personally of the opinion that if a bar/restaurant wants to offer smoking and the employees and patrons are fine with this it should be permissible.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

That's touchy. I happen to prefer smoke free establishments, but if it has good ventilation then I'd live with it. Though ultimately I just prefer people smoked outdoors.