It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BSB2005
Is that how the goverments and the NWO are using the 9/11, Madrid, and embassies attacks?
Originally posted by BSB2005
Just curious, hey what do you think about us starting a Newsletter for both members and non-members who may not have enough time to read us on the net?
Originally posted by BSB2005
proposal and stuff, b/c as soon as I move out, I wanna become one of the best uber-female novelists ever!
Originally posted by BSB2005
But I just write on here and on a parody fanfic I have on my hard drive for fun. And if you want your book to get off the ground, I can U2U and get some ideas,
all you have to do is put me in the acknowleadgements in your book.
Originally posted by BSB2005
I read lots, lots, lots, of books(too many to count and too many for my grandmother to stand).
Originally posted by thelibra
Which side is right? Who knows? My paranoid side says the first. My instincts say the second.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
The next time you see a dollar, ask it its' politacal affiliation?or its' religious affiliation?
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Interesting that the whole nation is divided along these lines(for the most part) and most will fight to the death for their beliefs. Much like Conspiracy Theorists.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
BTW, I'm currently reading the Shea/Wilson trilogy and find it a good read. I wish you luck in your writing endeavours.
Originally posted by thelibra
I'm not quite certain I grasp your meaning. Are you saying that 9/11 and the war in Iraq was all about money, or was the statement more Zen than that?
d buy the NWO angle a lot sooner, and for the most part the rational side of me says the NWO is bollocks. The war in Iraq isn't about money. It's too costly, the press generated is too bad, and the resentment is too great. It's driving the economy into the ground, and the only one's profiting at the moment are the DoD contractors.
eriously doubt the DoD contractors had anything to do with 9/11. If I am to assume that much, without proof, I might as well just throw in the towel right now, and never trust anyone again. Additionally, the defense contractors would have been equally happy had we sent the war to Afghanistan, where it belonged, or North Korea.
there has to be alterior motives other than money. Money is fun to blame, and makes for a real easy non-thinker of a response to "Why", but the truth is almost definitely far more complex.
and looks around). I'm not sure where these people are fighting to the death. I don't remember any violent outbreaks between the blue and red states, or voters at the polls, or anyone getting killed over their vote.
Come to that, I don't recall any conspiracy theorists getting killed for their beliefs, although I suppose the only way that would happen is if they were correct, and if that was the case, we'd probably never hear that they were killed.
originally posted by thelibra
...genuine real-world conspiracies like that crap the Republican Party tried to pull about the ethics committee...
Originally posted by MemoryShock
The economy lives to be driven into the ground; if we're experiencing a negative economic impact, someone else is having the flip side. You can't have zero without one.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
I'm not stating that DoD contractors is behind 9/11. But how long have they been planning a/for war? War is Peace and the chess game is the attitudes of the populations. The DoD definetely don't have a final say, but our there to capitalize.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Besides, I wouldn't trust anyone with money period.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Money is the problem. The only way to control the "game" is money.
Originally posted by thelibra
Yes, but there are a lot of rich becoming poor as well. So if the Rich are losing, the government is losing, and, as usual, the common man is losing, then the money is going... ...overseas I guess. And to defense contractors, of course.
Originally posted by thelibra
But isn't that their job? My job is to solve computer problems for other companies. I don't go around emailing viruses and corrupting file systems to keep myself employed though.
Originally posted by thelibra
Sometimes bad things just happen from a huge series of connected events, without an actual conspiracy being involved.
Originally posted by thelibra
Rich people are not evil just because they are rich. Not that there's not evil rich people, but still. Not all (or even most) rich people are evil.
Originally posted by thelibra
How is this a problem? Money is an agreed-upon standard, by which to judge the value of a good or a service, so that I don't have to figure out how to trade my tech support for a burger, or my novel for a car. That's ALL that money is.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
thelibra i think you are one of the wisest most intelligable people whom visit this website
i look forward to reading Any Post by you, because its always interesting, it always compells me to use my brain, and i always learn some really great stuff from it
great post and wonderful speculation
keep up the good work thelibra
look forward to seeing more intelligent posts by you
thers about 5 or 6 of you guys that i always love hearing your ideas, gazrok too especially hes hilarious
***votes for thelibra on side panel thingy***
Originally posted by thelibra
MemoryShock - I swear I'm not ignoring you, I'm just so shagged out from all this budgeting and work that I've yet to have the time to compose a proper response (or even finish my previous post).
Originally posted by thelibra
MemoryShock - I swear I'm not ignoring you, I'm just so shagged out from all this budgeting and work that I've yet to have the time to compose a proper response (or even finish my previous post).
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Especially in todays increasingly corporate world, you have the institution of corporate laws drawn up by the government. Many of these laws are provoked or dissuaded by corporate influence(lobbyists).
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Now a days, it is tough to see where the government ends and private business begins. The last two candidates were billionaires.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Point being, is that, IMO, government is there to compliment the private sector. The government is more concerned with the organization of the population, the attitudes of the people as they live their lives. The government is also concerned with the interaction of its people, not specifically, but generally, by the enforcement of an accepted morals and ethics code. This allows are judicial/criminal system to directly influence the people.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
The only way money comes into play here is, for the most part, operating cost. As to where the money goes.......it goes everywhere. That is what it does. Rich people losing means other rich people gain. The government, as long as it maintains operating cost, doesn't lose because it's not there to make money. It's there to operate and make functionable millions and millions of lives. The common man will always lose, or as I like to think, will always find another distraction.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Just to provide an example, there are hackers who make a nice living compromising a particular system, illustrating the problems to the business in question, and offering solutions. All under the guise of security/prevention.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Originally posted by thelibra
Sometimes bad things just happen from a huge series of connected events, without an actual conspiracy being involved.
IMO, being incredibly rich and having the capacity to sway governments, it would concievably be very irresponsible to not have a "conspiracy.
Originally posted by MemoryShockThough inclusive of some "evil" elements, who is to say the "conspiracy" isn't with the best of intentions? Sometimes bad things do happen as a result of connected events, but sometimes as well the connections were intentional.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
The amount of money possessed by the upper tier allows them far greater flexibility in their day to day life.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Money is more than a mechanical definition of economics; it's influence effects attitudes and personalities.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Money and Hammer can both cause harm, but with a hammer, I know who swung it. Because of the inclusive factor of money, it could be construed that anyone and everyone swung, including myself.
Originally posted by thelibra
Since a lot of my rebuttal is based upon the lack of discipline by the poor,
Originally posted by thelibra
I will simply refer to another thread I started about how The 5 Laws of Gold can turn even the poorest schmuck into a millionaire within their own lifetime.
Originally posted by thelibra
At least nowadays, Corporations have the decency to be sneaky about it and watchgroups and laws prevent a lot more than they allow. I agree, though, it is still heavily in favor of the Corporation, but it's actually gotten a lot better over the last century. There was a time when the corporations had the full power of the police and armed forces at their disposal, and would brazenly use it, with or without media coverage, and the President actually endorsed it publically.
Originally posted by thelibra
Well, I look at it like this: Whom would you rather be the leader of our country?
Originally posteed by thelibra
(Blink)........ then I don't see any reason for the rich or the government to have to do more than provide for their safety, infrastructure, and a relatively fair judicial system.
Originally posted by thelibra
I would say that the more likely reason is that, in a true emergency situation, time is the single most crucial resource.
Originally posted by thelibra
On the contrary, you can blackjack someone quite easily with a hammer. As a veteran of harder times, I can quite definitely state that physical attacks, ranged or not, can be executed without the least knowledge of who or where they came from or why.
The same can be said for money, but it can also be said that money also has a higher chance of leaving a trail to follow in the form of receipts.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
I have to say this is an important factor. However, the discipline of the poor can probably be attributed to their education level.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
On a conspiracy note, Bertrand Russell said something to the effect that the chasm of difference in the education of the upper, or ruling class, and the lower classes is to be unfathomable to the lower classes to an extent that even the most over-achieving member would be unable to achieve status beyond their given parameters. Now, I believe this to be an exaggeration, to a point, but roughly it is the truth.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
And this information isn't available to the lower classes, school is all about a vaunted view of history and literature that reinforces social standards....and memorization. There is no 'fluidity' in school, abstract thought and critical thinking, only staunch rigors and right and wrongs.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Not that it's necassarily a bad thing, but when you have an educational system that for the most part is set-up to instill a social behaviour and launch pad into a 9-5 reality, you're going to have many students completely miss the point.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Originally posted by thelibra
I will simply refer to another thread I started about how The 5 Laws of Gold can turn even the poorest schmuck into a millionaire within their own lifetime.
Unfamiliar with the 5 Laws of Gold and the link doesn't work.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Alot better for some........I am sure that blatant oppression still occurs. Also, the fact that they got a whole lot sneakier is probably the reason it can be described as better.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Originally posted by thelibra
Well, I look at it like this: Whom would you rather be the leader of our country?
A critical mind who doesn't have immediate interests in economy. But lacking that fairy tale, I see your point.
Originally posted by thelibra
A thread with how I hope to correct the school system is www.abovetopsecret.com...
In a nutshell,.......
Originally posted by thelibrathat savings will have doubled three times over by the time someone poor of really good discipline starts saving the same amount starting at age 21. That translates to 27 TIMES the amount of money.
Originally posted by thelibra
The problem is that the schools don't even give the student an education in 9-5 reality... they don't give them an education in -any- reality. At least a school geared towards 9-5 reality would help them get out of the gutter, but even "good" high schools don't give that much, they just produce higher grades
Originally posted by thelibra
Sorry about that. Here's the direct link www.abovetopsecret.com...
The thread covers what I have learned from George S. Clason's The Richest Man in Babylon. If you run across a copy, I cannot stress enough how much this book has changed my life for the better.
Originally posted by thelibra
because the reason most people get to the top is through networking and alternating between back-scratching and back-stabbing.
Originally posted by thelibra
So long as it doesn't get to the point where there are blatant human rights violations, or other comparable measures of harm or bribery done, I don't usually have too much of a problem with it.
Originally posted by thelibra
And it doesn't just happen at the top, it happens at every level. Restaurant workers routinely slip their friends and family extra food, for instance.
Originally posted by thelibra
I'd probably vote Alan Greenspan for president if times were more peaceful.
originally posted by thelibra
I'm glad you brought all this back up. I missed having good discussions. That's not a knock against the other ATS members, but rather my month-long absence from ATS (and your good posts).
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Interesting, I'll visit the thread and look further into your thoughts on this matter.....I have some opinions and theories regarding the educational sysytem myself and agree that the current incarnation of the school is inadequate.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
on a side note, the difference in perception a 'bigger picture' mindset as opposed to the average perception fraught with individual concerns is relevant as a large sum of money is what affords this concern. But I think this is me being repetitious.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
To be sure, there is no real education being given for reality......but rather, and this is my opinion, the school system is actually preparing people for their social roles and reinforcing social behaviours.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
The 9-5 reality is tis set of guidelines.......you go to work to earn money to justify the space you take up as well as to indulge in the various interests that enable the sating of the social impulses......in America, this formula has thrived and we find that many people get away with adhering to this standard without questioning it.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
I have encountered people with an inclination for curiosity, but rarely does it extend to beyond whatever passes for authority for them......I have had many frustrations in this direction.....at any rate.....it could be interesting to discuss the ramifications of a more lucid population as it would definitely have an impact on society as a whole, rather than streamlining the current system to create more efficient yes men and women.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
I believe fnords are actually are interpretations of isolated observations of conspiracy. A variant among all people, this would explain why noone can agree on conspiracy, because we all utilize our spiritual understandings to explain our physical realities, something that popular culture encourages. I just happened to use science..........
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Cool. I was a bit concerned that your reaction would be that of indignation at being called back to a thread that you may have decided to discard for good reason........This discussion, however, I do feel very interesting and you have brought up some excellent points that will compliment my own understandings.....in a word....thanks.
Originally posted by thelibra
Not just money, you can apply it to almost anything:...[snip]
It is said that "time is the great equalizer."
Originally posted by thelibra
If I could have the first 28 years of my life back, and know what I know now, I would break my first million in a few years.
thelibra
I will have to give it some thought. My perception is that one's peers and parenting determine, to a much greater extent, the social role and behaviors of the person. The weaker the parenting, the more influence the peers have, and the majority of the time, the peers are going to be a bad influence, because they are children, and children's natural desire is to rebel, or at least get away with doing as little work as possible, and getting a free ride through life.
Originally posted by thelibra
But what makes this wrong? If it works, and the people are happy to go about their lives, ignoring the larger problems they leave others to solve, why should they not be allowed that luxury?
Originally posted by thelibra
How many people do you know see something truly horrible on the news, say "Gosh, that's horrible" and the only thing they do about it is discuss it on break the next day at work? I'm guessing most of them, if not all of them. That is the status quo. It is not something people are forced into, it is a conscious choice, made by the grunties.