It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
a reply to: reldra
love me some gary but as a libertarian shouldn't he be against any funds being allotted to candidates? messed up when you have to play by their corrupt rules to play the game.
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: BlueShaman
Thank you for not voting for the witch.
Donald's is many things, but he's not a witch!
originally posted by: ArdentAngel
a reply to: gladtobehere
I did similar, voting for Jill Stein. I also live in a deep blue state, so I know that Clinton will carry the electoral votes, but today I voted to broaden the options for 2020.
Clinton or Trump. It doesn't matter who wins, because regardless of the results, we're all going to eventually lose.
originally posted by: ArdentAngel
a reply to: gladtobehere
I did similar, voting for Jill Stein. I also live in a deep blue state, so I know that Clinton will carry the electoral votes, but today I voted to broaden the options for 2020.
Clinton or Trump. It doesn't matter who wins, because regardless of the results, we're all going to eventually lose.
If the Libertarians can get 5% of the vote this year, it means that we will receive matching funds and a national stage in the next election.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
Ok, I did it. I voted for Johnson.
My polling location was not busy, at all, and there was only one other signature on the polling-book page that my name was on. Roughly 15 other names had no signatures.
So...in my world, voter turn out was not impressive.