It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Nigel Farage is coming to USA tomorrow to accept a job with Trump!

page: 1
7
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 02:03 PM
link   
The interim Ukip leader has even come up with the perfect role for him should ‘The Donald’ enlist his help.

And he’s so confident Mr Trump will win the race to the White House, he’s even booked a flight for tomorrow tomorrow morning.

Which is why Mr Farage, who was once nicknamed Mr Brexit by the Republican candidate, believes he would be the perfect candidate to be the ’ambassador to the EU’ for the US.

www.express.co.uk...


AWESOME!




posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 02:04 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth

Let's not get our panties all in a bunch just yet.

It sounds awesome, but Trump still has to win first.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 02:16 PM
link   
Wha., ho, is'n., can it.., no..... surely not?

Farage an ambassador for the U.S you say?

Oh, no the Daily Express says, they even mention tomorrow tomorrow morning.

Can foreign people become U.S Ambassadors? Farage is a bloody foreigner.
edit on 8/11/16 by Cobaltic1978 because: Missed a word



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 02:18 PM
link   
Nigel is a good man, A man of the people, If only there were more politicians like him....

His speeches at the EU are legendary.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 02:19 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth

I would welcome it!


Especially when Farage seems to know more about our freedoms and liberty than the Marxists being pumped out of our institutions of higher learning?


You go Nigel!



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 02:23 PM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963

According to Dr Peter Beter, the communists took over Washington a long time ago.

Maybe Clinton doth protest too much about the Russians?



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 02:23 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth

Bit of a wasted trip but it looks warmer over there so why not..

If true it'd be like Dumb and Dumber in real life.


edit on 8-11-2016 by gortex because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 02:26 PM
link   
Good, keep him, we don't want him over here anyway...



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 02:32 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth

Trump has already loaned one of his wigs to our Nige.






posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 02:39 PM
link   
I just shows you what a useless bastard Farage is. Spends his time in mainland Europe whinging about his beloved UK, now that job is near done, and everything a big mess, he reckons he's off to the US, to do some shiite stirring there....what an arse!



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 02:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Cobaltic1978

It is a difficult topic to find the answer too. here is the best I could find




Appropriations Act Restrictions Congress prohibits the use of appropriated funds to employ non-citizens within the United States. Certain groups of non-citizens are not included in this ban. They are: -Persons who owe permanent allegiance to the United States (for example, natives of American Samoa and Swains Island). -Aliens from Cuba, Poland, South Vietnam, countries of the former Soviet Union, or the Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence. -South Vietnamese, Cambodian or Laotian refugees paroled into the United States after January 1, 1975. -Nationals of the People’s Republic of China who qualify for adjustment of status pursuant to the Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992. -Citizens of Ireland, Israel, or the Republic of the Philippines. -Nationals of countries currently allied with the United States in a defense effort, (as determined by the Office of the Assistant Legal Adviser for Treaty Affairs, Department of State)??. -International broadcasters employed by the U.S. Information Agency. -Translators employed temporarily. -People employed up to 60 days on an emergency basis in the field service.


or on another site



Additionally, at any of these levels of education, you can apply to work as a temporary employee or volunteer with the State Department, a position that could provide you key contacts for the application process later on. Contrary to popular notion, future diplomats do not have educational or foreign language requirements to meet; you simply must be between the ages of 20 and 59 and aUS citizen. However, additional accomplishments will boost you above the competition.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 02:45 PM
link   
Do us a favour, Keep the #.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 02:54 PM
link   
a reply to: jellyrev

Thanks dude.

The first example you provided relates to Translators and other services required for an invasion, oops sorry intervention in a foreign land.

The second example you provided, probably answers the question, as far as Ambassadors are concerned.

As there is no clip of Farage saying this, it was obviously said in jest and now it's being reported on with a slightly different slant.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 02:57 PM
link   
Yes those who stir the sh#t pot, should also lick the spoon...a reply to: smurfy




posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 03:02 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth

We don't need 2 Trumps.


One is bad enough.
edit on 8-11-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 03:03 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth

As they say, "Birds of a feather..." Scum attracts scum.
edit on 8-11-2016 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 03:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
As there is no clip of Farage saying this, it was obviously said in jest and now it's being reported on with a slightly different slant.


12:40 in...



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 03:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: xstealth

We don't need 2 Trumps.


One is bad enough.

Don't worry. Come Wednesday we'll be back down to 1 and that 1 will be losing public relevancy at an exponential rate the further we get from the election.



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 03:10 PM
link   
Nobody seems to be saying that a job is on offer. Given the culture differences between American and British conservatism, it sems unlikely.
It's possible that he was talking tongue-in-cheek, anyway. Was he responding to a question on whether he would take a job? "Yeah, sure".

P.S. I've just seen the clip a couple of posts above. Yes, that's exactly what happened. It's another panellist on the programme who is pushing the idea on him.
edit on 8-11-2016 by DISRAELI because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2016 @ 03:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: DISRAELI
It's possible that he was talking tongue-in-cheek, anyway. Was he responding to a question on whether he would take a job? "Yeah, sure".

The answer is in my post above.




top topics



 
7
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join