It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The contract called for payment of “first class expenses,” including the hotel of Gingrich’s choice, and “first class airfare.” A Gingrich aide gets a smaller hotel room ”located nearby the suite, but not attached.” A contract addendum also notes that “Mrs. Gingrich” may sometimes travel with her husband and “will be needed to be seated beside Mr. Gingrich at all functions.”
Perhaps most curious was language requiring a “non-smoking one-bedroom suite (preferably with two bathrooms).” The Smoking Gun compared Gingrich’s “loo requirement” with “Mary J. Blige’s toilet seat proviso,” in which the singer required “a private toilet (with new toilet seat)” as part of her standard performance contract.
The Gingrich contract suggests that the former House speaker received $50,000 for the convocation event in Missouri, which is $10,000 shy of the amount that he has said he usually commands for speeches.
“I was charging $60,000 a speech, and the number of speeches was going up, not down,” Gingrich said recently.
Gingrich’s money-making and spending habits have become a central issue in the presidential race since he has risen to the top of the Republican field ahead of Mitt Romney. Gingrich amassed a $150 million financial empire after leaving Congress and is still trying to dig out from under a mountain of debt from private charter planes and other pricey expenses in the early weeks of his campaign.
However, Republicans aren't running around attacking those who have been successful and earned a lot of money. Liberals do. It is the height of hypocrisy to slam those who work for a living as not paying their fair share, telling them they didn't build their businesses, or any of the other claptrap from the left while the Clintons run around making tens of millions of dollars giving speeches.
It is like how Michael Moore slams capitalism, but then used capitalism to enrich himself. I'm supposed to feel guilty earning millions in finance or building a business, yet it is ok for liberal political hacks to make millions giving speeches or acting in movies?
newt has very specific insider knowledge on how Washington works. Now that we all know how corrupt it really is, having a guide to show you where the pungi sticks are would be a wise choice.