It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. The news is as strong as the ORIGINAL source. If you don't report the ORIGINAL source, you don't have news. In this information age of 10s of thousands of claims of "career ending information on Clinton" either provide the ORIGINAL source with a quote or your claim is not worth reading because we don't have the time to read through all the hyped up BS to find the real news.
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: AlienView
More opinion. You should quote the incriminating emails if you want to persuade.
They are all over the place.
If you need it read word for word from a progressive news reporter, here you go..
www.realclearpolitics.com...
He's even still voting for her which is asinine.
Still more opinion. Which emails, specifically, are incriminating?
Glad you watched a 17 minute video in 2 minutes.
Why should I watch a video? I want a link to an incriminating email so I can judge for myself.
You are what's wrong with this country. You need to be spoon fed your news, too lazy to do some real research, and then deny everything that's right I front of you because it doesn't align with your party.
We deserve what we get.
originally posted by: fractal5
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. The news is as strong as the ORIGINAL source. If you don't report the ORIGINAL source, you don't have news. In this information age of 10s of thousands of claims of "career ending information on Clinton" either provide the ORIGINAL source with a quote or your claim is not worth reading because we don't have the time to read through all the hyped up BS to find the real news.
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: AlienView
More opinion. You should quote the incriminating emails if you want to persuade.
They are all over the place.
If you need it read word for word from a progressive news reporter, here you go..
www.realclearpolitics.com...
He's even still voting for her which is asinine.
Still more opinion. Which emails, specifically, are incriminating?
Glad you watched a 17 minute video in 2 minutes.
Why should I watch a video? I want a link to an incriminating email so I can judge for myself.
You are what's wrong with this country. You need to be spoon fed your news, too lazy to do some real research, and then deny everything that's right I front of you because it doesn't align with your party.
We deserve what we get.
This is why I stop watching about half of "news" clips after less than three minutes. I know 90% of them were BS and didn't want to waste my time to learn the 10% of hype that turns out to be true.
originally posted by: Throes
The original source is Wikileaks emails as if you watch the video
originally posted by: HeywoodFloyd
a reply to: AlienView
Thanks, AlienView.
Mrs. Hillary Clinton is a crook.
just a further confirmation of what every intelligent person already knew.
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: AlienView
More opinion. You should quote the incriminating emails if you want to persuade.
They are all over the place.
If you need it read word for word from a progressive news reporter, here you go..
www.realclearpolitics.com...
He's even still voting for her which is asinine.
Still more opinion. Which emails, specifically, are incriminating?
Glad you watched a 17 minute video in 2 minutes.
Why should I watch a video? I want a link to an incriminating email so I can judge for myself.
You are what's wrong with this country. You need to be spoon fed your news, too lazy to do some real research, and then deny everything that's right I front of you because it doesn't align with your party.
We deserve what we get.
originally posted by: RedDragon
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: AlienView
More opinion. You should quote the incriminating emails if you want to persuade.
They are all over the place.
If you need it read word for word from a progressive news reporter, here you go..
www.realclearpolitics.com...
He's even still voting for her which is asinine.
Still more opinion. Which emails, specifically, are incriminating?
Glad you watched a 17 minute video in 2 minutes.
Why should I watch a video? I want a link to an incriminating email so I can judge for myself.
You are what's wrong with this country. You need to be spoon fed your news, too lazy to do some real research, and then deny everything that's right I front of you because it doesn't align with your party.
We deserve what we get.
Dude most people have jobs and social relationships.
There's one guy on the UFO/ Alien forum that wants me to watch a 2 hour video about alien abductions, there's a guy on the 9/11 forum that wants me to watch a 45 minute video about planes being holograms, and you want people to watch your own little 20 minute video.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Throes
The video isn't right wing propaganda. It's Cenk from the Young Turks who host a progressive talk show on Sirius XM.
Don't tell him it's progressive propaganda, or he might have to do away with his double standards.
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: RedDragon
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: AlienView
More opinion. You should quote the incriminating emails if you want to persuade.
They are all over the place.
If you need it read word for word from a progressive news reporter, here you go..
www.realclearpolitics.com...
He's even still voting for her which is asinine.
Still more opinion. Which emails, specifically, are incriminating?
Glad you watched a 17 minute video in 2 minutes.
Why should I watch a video? I want a link to an incriminating email so I can judge for myself.
You are what's wrong with this country. You need to be spoon fed your news, too lazy to do some real research, and then deny everything that's right I front of you because it doesn't align with your party.
We deserve what we get.
Dude most people have jobs and social relationships.
There's one guy on the UFO/ Alien forum that wants me to watch a 2 hour video about alien abductions, there's a guy on the 9/11 forum that wants me to watch a 45 minute video about planes being holograms, and you want people to watch your own little 20 minute video.
I have a job as well. That's why I rely on the video to provide the evidence to support my claim.
You don't have to watch it if you want, just don't try and refute a claim about it. Just because I don't have the time to lay out the e-mails personally doesn't mean I can't refer to a video.
I want a link to an incriminating email so I can judge for myself.
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: DJW001
I want a link to an incriminating email so I can judge for myself.
here are two easy to find.
wrong one hold on i'll go pull it again
notice cvc is, Chelsea Victoria Clinton.
link to email
Poker Night
now that i've spoon fed you, look for more on your own. also remember that chelsea has another alias as Diane Reynolds
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: DJW001
I want a link to an incriminating email so I can judge for myself.
here are two easy to find.
wrong one hold on i'll go pull it again
notice cvc is, Chelsea Victoria Clinton.
link to email
Poker Night
now that i've spoon fed you, look for more on your own. also remember that chelsea has another alias as Diane Reynolds
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: Throes
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: AlienView
More opinion. You should quote the incriminating emails if you want to persuade.
They are all over the place.
If you need it read word for word from a progressive news reporter, here you go..
www.realclearpolitics.com...
He's even still voting for her which is asinine.
Still more opinion. Which emails, specifically, are incriminating?
From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Date: 2012-01-04 19:43
Subject:
I just received a call from a close friend of wjcs who said that cvc told one of the bush 43 kids that she is conducting an internal investigation of money within the foundation from cgi to the foundation
The bush kid then told someone else who then told an operative within the republican party
I have heard more and more chatter of cvc and bari talking about lots of what is going on internally to people
Not smart
From:[email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: 2012-01-04 21:45
Subject: Re:
I learned from the best
The investigation into her getting paid for campaigning, using foundation resources for her wedding and life for a decade, taxes on money from her parents....
I hope that you will speak to her and end this
Once we go down this road....