It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Perhaps ponder this: after all the vile allegations that Cathy O'Brien has made against Hillary and Bill Clinton, why have they not slapped her with a defamation suit? She published a book for heaven's sake! I would if I were innocent.
originally posted by: Marvelous
Once again, I doubt you're reading the articles. The victims that you say don't exist describe how they are taken from foster care, day cares and orphanages and "loaned" out to politicians. You asked where they could possibly get these children from, I am providing an answer.
The Wikipedia (which I agree is a terrible source of information) article is provided to illustrate how the matter is trivialized. It lists the multitude of instances where day cares have been accused of satanic child abuse (isn't this what Podesta et all are being suspected of) and yet the it then goes on to say being concerned about it is hysterical. My tongue-in-cheek comment was a hint.
The reason I gave the Truth Feed News article was because it provided a clear and concise summary of evidence that has been uncovered mostly from Wikileaks emails. Are you not aware of the Hillary-Laura Silsby connection? Should I provide you with a litany of Wikileaks?
No article that you have provided says this, or anything close to it.
So again, I'm not sure why you're brandishing this link as some kind of damning proof because it actually undermines your own argument.
I see. A source that contradicts everything you say is in fact supporting evidence that what you are saying is correct?
Since Ms O'Brien is plainly in need of psychiatric treatment, this would be very difficult to do.
Hypnotic regression is utterly notorious for producing false memories.
Qh dear, looks like I will have to pull quotes from the articles then.
From the Franklin Child Abuse Scandal article (the first one I provided):
"The claims include one that police deliberately stalled their inquiries into the Elm Guest House, in Barnes, south-west London, leaving dozens of boys to be abused. Victims claim that high-profile politicians, diplomats and civil servants visited the property to abuse boys in the 1970s and 1980s." Bearing in mind of course that the boys were brought to Elm Guest House from near-by children's homes.
With regards to the OregonLive article; yes it indeed describes how the children were sexually assaulted on the premises by visitors.
No, using a source that pushes the mainstream narrative to illustrate how the mainstream narrative trivializes the issue is perfectly acceptable. Whether these incidents happened is not in question.
The victims from the squashed case provided ample corroborating evidence that his island was used for the purpose of pimping out underage girls. The Clintons have frequented this island on numerous occasions.
I then also pointed out the connection between Hillary and the Haiti child trafficking scandal.
So where's the next goalpost?
In as much as you then go on to selectively quote from an article that doesn't agree with you, the above statement is true.
It was actually the second link you provided, and since you're yanking allegations out of context in a case that was disproven, I don't need to address this.
Again, claims that are being investigated, not substantiated facts. And at least two of the allegations that have been made (against Harvey Proctor MP and Field Marshall Lord Bramall) have been proven baseless. Since the Harvey Proctor allegation involved former Prime Minister Edward Heath (deceased), it looks like that is out of the window too.
No further comment required.
OK, so you're quoting a source that disagrees with you 100 per cent in order to show that you are correct and the mainstream outlet you are quoting trivialises the issue, because the claims that have been shown to be baseless are in fact true?
I have been to central London many times. There are radical mosques in central London. Therefore I am a radicalised Muslim. Same logic. (In case the NSA are looking in, I am no such thing by the way).
And yes, she is in need of treatment. Not because she is insane (I have no evidence of that) but because her stories are conjured up during hypnotic regression treatments administered by her husband.