It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

who finds the offensive

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 25 2005 @ 10:40 AM
link   


who finds this offencive

because to me it goes with who he is




posted on Jan, 25 2005 @ 11:00 AM
link   
I don't find it offensive, but I find it ridiculous. Mayhaps you should take another look at your signature...

"Men in general are quick to believe that which they wish to be true."



posted on Jan, 25 2005 @ 12:01 PM
link   
I don't find it offensive but i think it is in very bad taste, Bush is nothing like Hitler, no matter what people say, Bush could never compare to the evil that Hitler achieved through the third Reich.



posted on Jan, 25 2005 @ 12:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Faisca
I don't find it offensive, but I find it ridiculous. Mayhaps you should take another look at your signature...

"Men in general are quick to believe that which they wish to be true."


yeah but it's always harder to follow people's own advices. Which is where the hypocrisy comes in.

The difference between hitler and bush is that hitler haddeath camps set up to make "his country one filled with perfect people, blue eyed, blond hair"

I don't see bush slaughtering handicapped people, gay people, jewish people, and any other person that isn't blond/blue.

But I do see him going after the group of people who find it ok to bomb the wtc and nightclubs around the world, and us embassy's, and train's, and all the rest.



why don't you put allah akbar underneath a picture of hitler shaking hands with al zarqawi, it's more fitting.

afterall we're all infedels because we're not muslim.

[edit on 25-1-2005 by TrueLies]



posted on Jan, 25 2005 @ 02:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by TrueLies

why don't you put allah akbar underneath a picture of hitler shaking hands with al zarqawi, it's more fitting.

afterall we're all infedels because we're not muslim.

[edit on 25-1-2005 by TrueLies]


i want opinins not a argument on religon
if you want to argue about that make your own thread

dont
others



posted on Jan, 25 2005 @ 02:36 PM
link   
offencive....no

tastless... yes because theres plenty of other people deserving of that title.

mature...hardly


will you guys just quit your belly aching already! its only 4 more years. that means you guys have 4 years to get your party back on track and actually put up a good candidate for next time. i knew you guys were gonna lose when i saw that john kerry was your party's choice.


better luck next time.



posted on Jan, 25 2005 @ 03:20 PM
link   
Offensive ? - certainly not.

I choose what to be offended with and I believe that my priorities are sound. I am offended by children being murdered, with rape and pedophilia, with the corporate destruction of the world for profit. I am offended by war especially immoral ones, and those who wage such wars for their own ends.

But a picture of Bush and Hitler ?

Actually, I think its hilarious.




posted on Jan, 25 2005 @ 05:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by bodrul
i want opinins not a argument on religon
if you want to argue about that make your own thread dont
others


the hypocrisy of it all... I think the first person to argue with someone in this thread was you...

If you take a second glance it was an opinion...

Hardly an argument, get your ducks lined up before you go shooting.



posted on Jan, 25 2005 @ 08:42 PM
link   
Place a small moustache on the smirking chimp's upper lip for a more realistic impression, and my artistic sensibilities will be less offended. Otherwise, whether you use the swastika or misuse the US flag behind the chimp's head, there is not much wrong about the image.

Genocide is thankfully missing so far from the insane neo-cons' agenda as voiced by the chimp's mutterings on freedom and liberty and other soundbites directed to the LCD.



posted on Jan, 26 2005 @ 06:55 PM
link   
gone back to the old one
....
......

[edit on 26-1-2005 by bodrul]



posted on Jan, 28 2005 @ 03:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by bodrul
i want opinins not a argument on religon
if you want to argue about that make your own thread

dont
others


wow...that was kinda funny....

bodrul, you asked our opinion and TrueLies told you...



posted on Mar, 1 2005 @ 06:14 AM
link   
it's pretty funny, plus it's in bad taste, so i like it even more. i don't think it true though, apart from the whole conquest thing they both got going on.



posted on Mar, 1 2005 @ 04:08 PM
link   
offensive ??? nope... wrong??/ yep.... do some history study...many many differences...



posted on Mar, 1 2005 @ 05:16 PM
link   
Hitler wasn't all bad, apart from the flatulence and the whole Nazi thing. He was a highly motivated individual! Sure his goals were blatently immoral and faschist, but he displayed an act of proffeciancy and rigid self-discipline, rarely seen among common, law-abiding citizens.
I don't agree with racist or faschist views and herr Hitler was clearly a deviation from what we would consider to be the social norm. However, I am trying to point out that his drive is as powerful and confident as that of Mr.Bush. Hitler thought his race of super-soldiers had superior physical and mental prowess, as no doubt Bush does with his payload of big-ass guns and aircraft. America considers itself to be the world's only remaining super-power, superior in every aspect to the Muslim fanatics against which they fight...
... Is that not similar to Hitler's views?

Now who finds THIS offencive?



posted on Mar, 6 2005 @ 03:10 PM
link   
ATS is all about opinions, and your opinion is rightfully shown threw art in a form of which I can respect. Yet I dont even believe Bush makes most of these decisions to war, and attack foreign soil. He's paid to take orders from a higher council by my understanding. Yet the artwork is good, nice Im gonna go now



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join