It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Democrats are coming out and voting for TRUMP IN DROVES

page: 4
31
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: BrokedownChevy

originally posted by: CulturalResilience

originally posted by: BrokedownChevy

originally posted by: olaru12
The desperation I see is coming from the Trump voters; why else the constant parroting from dubious sources telling us Trump will be the victor.







They're insecure. It's a weakness. The truth hurts when you know you're on the losing side so the defense mechanisms activate.


Case in point.


Exactly. You couldn't help, but to respond despite that you have no idea where I stand. I'm not even voting. Clinton sucks. Again. Thanks for showing us all how weak Trump supporters are.

Insecure.
.




I never suggested you were a Clinton supporter, I highlighted your response as it was representative of what is being displayed by both sides. If assumption is a weakness then you assuming I support Trump is equally demonstrative.
edit on 6-11-2016 by CulturalResilience because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Snarl

and hell on earth



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: IAMTAT

Do you know a Democrat who cares if shes corrupt?


The funny thing is: we know Trump is corrupt. Real Facts. Fake charity, refuses to pay workers, gropes women, etc.

We still only have speculation, rumors, etc on Clinton.



After everything that has been leaked, including the destruction of Bernie's campaign, Schultz resigning in great embarrassment to all democrats alive, even those supporting corruption, not because of the crimes done, but because the crimes were exposed, and then Hillary hiring the exposed DNC head, without any regard at the message that sends to all the decent law abiding folks in the world, and you say with a straight face that it's all rumors and speculation?

Interesting viewpoint, but it's one that is glaringly transparent, and I can't help but feel sorry for one so deeply deceived.



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
If you care at all about the environment, green sustainable energy, or women's rights, Hillary is the only choice.


Sustainable energy is far and away the most important issue we face in the world. If there was one candidate that took this issue as seriously as I do I'd actually vote.



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: IAMTAT

Do you know a Democrat who cares if shes corrupt?


The funny thing is: we know Trump is corrupt. Real Facts. Fake charity, refuses to pay workers, gropes women, etc.

We still only have speculation, rumors, etc on Clinton.



After everything that has been leaked, including the destruction of Bernie's campaign, Schultz resigning in great embarrassment to all democrats alive, even those supporting corruption, not because of the crimes done, but because the crimes were exposed, and then Hillary hiring the exposed DNC head, without any regard at the message that sends to all the decent law abiding folks in the world, and you say with a straight face that it's all rumors and speculation?

Interesting viewpoint, but it's one that is glaringly transparent, and I can't help but feel sorry for one so deeply deceived.


I stopped counting her posts as genuine after the same repetitive rhetoric, with an almost instantaneous inpouring of stars subsequently. Go back and read her posts and in at least every one, with respect to this election cycle, you can see a recurring theme. I dilike corruption, corrupt politicians and corrupt Governments - I dislike far more, the people who toe party lines irrespective of qualified candidates or real-world issues.



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:28 PM
link   
I'm a registered Democrat, and I'm voting for Trump, and where I live is about 65% Democrat. So yesterday an obvious Hillary supporter was canvassing door-to-door to get out the vote for Hillary. She wanted to make sure I knew where the polling place was and if I needed a ride there on Tues. I told her I would vote on the way to work. I noticed a Katie McGinty (D) placard in her hand. McGinty is running against Pat Toomey for PA Senator. I told the volunteer I would be voting for McGinty but not Clinton. She got a funny look on her face and said she was getting that response from a majority of registered Dems in my neighborhood. I told her to look around on the street where there are a number of Trump/Pence lawn signs and absolutely zero Clinton signs. She walked away with a forlorn look on her face.



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: BrokedownChevy

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
If you care at all about the environment, green sustainable energy, or women's rights, Hillary is the only choice.


Sustainable energy is far and away the most important issue we face in the world. If there was one candidate that took this issue as seriously as I do I'd actually vote.


That is something I would also support but I don't believe there is one single politician in the western world in the mainstream parties that is not in the pocket of the fossil energy cartel. This is why I consider politicians cannot really solve any of the worlds problems.
The worlds problems are not political in nature, they are technical. Politicians cannot solve technical problems, only technicians can do that. If I thought Trump, Clinton, or any other politician of any stripe understood this issue I would vote for them and encourage others to do the same.
edit on 6-11-2016 by CulturalResilience because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: CulturalResilience

originally posted by: BrokedownChevy

originally posted by: CulturalResilience

originally posted by: BrokedownChevy

originally posted by: olaru12
The desperation I see is coming from the Trump voters; why else the constant parroting from dubious sources telling us Trump will be the victor.







They're insecure. It's a weakness. The truth hurts when you know you're on the losing side so the defense mechanisms activate.


Case in point.


Exactly. You couldn't help, but to respond despite that you have no idea where I stand. I'm not even voting. Clinton sucks. Again. Thanks for showing us all how weak Trump supporters are.

Insecure.
.




I never suggested you were a Clinton supporter, I highlighted your response as it was representative of what is being displayed by both sides. If assumption is a weakness then you assuming I support Trump is equally demonstrative.


It's the season for bashing politicians and their parrots. The people who sit on the sidelines watching this freak show are the silent majority. When all of you cannibalize each other we will inherit the earth and live in peace. Now go back to destroying each other.



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: IAMTAT

Do you know a Democrat who cares if shes corrupt?


The funny thing is: we know Trump is corrupt. Real Facts. Fake charity, refuses to pay workers, gropes women, etc.

We still only have speculation, rumors, etc on Clinton.



After everything that has been leaked, including the destruction of Bernie's campaign, Schultz resigning in great embarrassment to all democrats alive, even those supporting corruption, not because of the crimes done, but because the crimes were exposed, and then Hillary hiring the exposed DNC head, without any regard at the message that sends to all the decent law abiding folks in the world, and you say with a straight face that it's all rumors and speculation?

Interesting viewpoint, but it's one that is glaringly transparent, and I can't help but feel sorry for one so deeply deceived.


Where are the leaks on the GOP?

Oh wait, there aren't any.

Hard to compare the inner workings of a campaign - - - with one sided info.



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Right Annee. The GOP is squeaky-clean by comparison.



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: BrokedownChevy

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
If you care at all about the environment, green sustainable energy, or women's rights, Hillary is the only choice.


Sustainable energy is far and away the most important issue we face in the world. If there was one candidate that took this issue as seriously as I do I'd actually vote.


Hillary Clinton is absolutely that candidate. Trump wants to deregulate environment protections. He and republicans want to go the opposite direction.

So if environment and sustainable clean energy is important, a vote for Hillary pushes those ideas forward... I agree the importance of green sustainable energy can not be overstated. Hillary has expressed it as a primary goal.



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:38 PM
link   
a reply to: CulturalResilience




The worlds problems are not political in nature, they are technical. Politicians cannot solve technical problems, only technicians can do that. If I thought Trump, Clinton, or any other politician of any stripe understood this issue I would vote for them and encourage others to do the same.


But it's the politicians that control the money flow to the worlds problems. That's why I always say that WAR is a business because there is always money for the war profiteers, while social problem solutions go begging.

The Military Industrial complex as an oligarchy almost make's politics obsolete. It's all just a show to make the proles think they have a voice in the madness.
edit on 6-11-2016 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: IAMTAT

Do you know a Democrat who cares if shes corrupt?


The funny thing is: we know Trump is corrupt. Real Facts. Fake charity, refuses to pay workers, gropes women, etc.

We still only have speculation, rumors, etc on Clinton.



After everything that has been leaked, including the destruction of Bernie's campaign, Schultz resigning in great embarrassment to all democrats alive, even those supporting corruption, not because of the crimes done, but because the crimes were exposed, and then Hillary hiring the exposed DNC head, without any regard at the message that sends to all the decent law abiding folks in the world, and you say with a straight face that it's all rumors and speculation?

Interesting viewpoint, but it's one that is glaringly transparent, and I can't help but feel sorry for one so deeply deceived.


Where are the leaks on the GOP?

Oh wait, there aren't any.

Hard to compare the inner workings of a campaign - - - with one sided info.



That could well have something to do with there being no National Security Threat related email server at Trump Tower.....but I'm sure if the slot machines started becoming a National Security Threat, WikiLeaks would be all over that.



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:46 PM
link   
a reply to: CulturalResilience

If you truly care about the environment then you would know that Trump and republicans actively push for deregulating environment protections. Hillary is absolutely pushing for green sustainable energy. If you would sit by and let Republicans run backwards on this... I just don't know how anyone who cares about such issues could turn a blind eye to that. Get out and vote!



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

The Clinton foundation has admitted they have broken the law.
Video evidence shows Clinton was not under fire at some Govt excursion/meeting.
Email evidence discussing Funds of Clinton foundation used for own use eg Chelsea wedding.
Evidence shows her maid has been filing reading copying wiping her arse with classified documents.
Her husband socialises with a paedophile.
She openly admits i have a view for the public (you know like for Annee the peasants, the averge Joes)) and private(for us elite)
She has even said things that are perjury.


(thankyou 'the2ofusr1' for the youtube video instruction))


edit on 6-11-2016 by Zngland because: forgot t add a thingymajig



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: CulturalResilience

If you truly care about the environment then you would know that Trump and republicans actively push for deregulating environment protections. Hillary is absolutely pushing for green sustainable energy. If you would sit by and let Republicans run backwards on this... I just don't know how anyone who cares about such issues could turn a blind eye to that. Get out and vote!


Pushing for something is one thing, the ability to attain it is another. The world wont suddenly breathe a sigh of relief simply because Hillary were to get elected. She is ill-suited (and likely not desireous) to affect any change on that. On principle alone she would be fought tooth and nail such that she would be at a stalemate much in the same way Obama has been. Like Obama, she doesn't inspire confidence in almost anything at all enough to bring something she "pushes for" to fruition.



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 12:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zngland

The Clinton foundation has admitted they have broken the law.


Show me legal documents. With real names of law enforcement.

You do know there are 2 foundations, right?

I've been doing this a long time. Speculations rarely pan out to fact. At least fact that can be tried in a criminal court.



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 01:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

How many foundations does she need ?
Yes i do.

edit on 6-11-2016 by Zngland because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 01:02 PM
link   
a reply to: alphabetaone

Green sustainable energy is a fight for ALL of us to get involved in. Hillary is ready to lead that fight, but we ALL have to get out and vote and show our support.

If Trump wins, the message and momentum will be to go backwards on these issues.

If you're waiting for a candidate who can single-handedly defeat the fossil fuel industry that day will never come. You have to keep pushing! Right now, Hillary is that strong push forward. Anything else is a retreat.


edit on 6-11-2016 by spiritualzombie because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 6 2016 @ 01:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Zngland

The Clinton foundation has admitted they have broken the law.


Show me legal documents. With real names of law enforcement.

You do know there are 2 foundations, right?

I've been doing this a long time. Speculations rarely pan out to fact. At least fact that can be tried in a criminal court.





I do understand the challenges involved in constantly repeating the same things over and over, so I've no doubt that you've been doing this a long time.

However, you may want to take up a new hobby; that of coalescing data into fact, regardless whether or not it's litigatable. We don't want her in jail, that's dumb, hell if I had an alphabetaone foundation and I needed some extra cash for my daughters wedding, I might dip - I would repay it but I probably would - we simply don't want her as President. Then again, I don't want Trump as President either....imagine the shortage of spray on tans and the waiting list at the hair club for men.




top topics



 
31
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join