It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Obama:"The FBI Should Not Be Used as a Political Tool".. WHAT?!

page: 1
14

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 03:21 PM
link   
When I click into the post field, that message from the ATS
shepherds will disappear. For that guys and gals my thanks.
I'll try and keep the content as short and clear AP; because
this is my first OP in the Mud-Pit. I expect to pay hell because
this is based 100% on perception-- and mine by now is ques-
tionable in this election cycle. If it starts getting to
sound emotional we can always shoehorn to another forum.
It's beginning to feel ranty, and no hard feelings whatsoever.

MEAT. Recently, like in the last couple of days Fearless Leader
has come out and actually slammed his own appointee for
doing his job based on new evidence; finally reprimanding
him in the media for using the FBI as a 'political tool".
I saw and heard his lips flap on Fox, but it looks like just
about everybody's picking up on it... and it's been awhile
since Director Comey saw fit to re-open the gaping maw
of the e-mail issue. SIDEBAR: It's delightfully debatable
whether or not there's any viable FBI investigation at
present into the Clinton Foundation: or money/paper/
whatever trail(s). Separate thread, keep it outahere.

Back story, James Comey AND Loretta Lynch both were
appointed by him to serve the Executive Branch and sub-
sequently the people. I'm not much on analyzing intent;
but I like occasionally to backtrack through the document-
able milestones of fact to just maybe obtain root causes.

In the last couple of days my neo-Gothic halfbreed skull
has been popped with sufficient hypocrisy to sound off.
Is this the same guy that (with a little help behind the
scenes) did everything but broadside prominent political
groups with the IRS? I'll have to acquiesce that a federal
agency isn't a political tool if the President uses it for HIS
(Saints preserve us HER) party's advantage...

I must be hallucinating recently from a too-generous pre-
scription level of blood pressure meds... but the echo I'm
getting from the rest of the media seems to verify my stupor:
and still feel like I need either a boost or an oral shot.

This finally from the president that has stepped over a line
of propriety and stumped for the first time in my memory
for the presidential successor of his party... ironically AFTER
it's been seen to a couple of days previously-- that there's
nothing to see here.

Is my schpiel checker working for you? How about my logic?
And that's I before E except after schlemiel. And I are one.
PS I can't spend a lot of time on responding to anybody;
although i expect the usual dry brimstone to begin in
three, two, you know you'll be the first one. Hit me, I'm
officially retirement age and think I've finally seen it all
in this election cycle. Is this cry in the wilderness ALSO over
just another excused thumb on the blindfolded girl's scales?




posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 03:29 PM
link   
a reply to: derfreebie

I am pretty sure dear leader has been speaking out of both sides of his mouth for quite the expanse of time.

Particular to Comey and his recent about face regarding the reopening of the investigation in to former Secretary Clinton's use of a private email server, it does seem that Obama himself is confused.

Am I have a Mandella moment or did Obama not praise Comey for doing his job without letting the politics of the situation affect the outcome?

And now he's hammering him saying the opposite?

I'm wondering if Hillary's confusion is communicable...



posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: derfreebie


Well, I honestly cant even seem to work out (in this section of the forums) whether or not I'm supposed to be inherently sarcastic or legitimate! You expect me to process your cerebral concataney with cohesive culmination? I cant!


However, I think a lot rides on precisely how he means "tool", does he mean shouldn't be used to subvert voters minds? Or does he mean shouldn't be used in the manner consistent with it's creation because it's ... well ... dammit it's just not nice! (imagine Bill Maher saying that, and that's precisely how I just said it in my head)


So much vitriol flying about in so many directions I have decided to use it as a condiment for my culinary commencements.



posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 03:36 PM
link   
All the big Democrats are having heart attacks and fits over the massive exposures this year.

All their cheap talk about conspiracies has caught up with them.

Just count all the liars that have been exposed by all the government reports and leaks.

Obama is his own victim.




posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 03:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: derfreebie

I am pretty sure dear leader has been speaking out of both sides of his mouth for quite the expanse of time.

...Abbreviated for brevity's sake...
And now he's hammering him saying the opposite?

I'm wondering if Hillary's confusion is communicable...


There's that Camelot fellow (if I recall one Mr.Wilcox?
You may know of him, a stunning resemblance to Edgar
Cayce) describing something I may have misinterpreted
as a time-wave. Did we just recently pass that Zero deal?

If it explains to my pre-neanderthal mentality, some other
universe's reality path pulling out of a fast lane and pre-
paring to do a paint exchange with the front of my 56'
BelAir in this one-- I can hope the rings in HIS Fuelie are
better than mine. Because if equipment is about to
exchange, whoever's driving the one from OUR perceived
Twilight Zone will be getting the short end of the 327 stick.
edit on 5-11-2016 by derfreebie because: Lighter, post-modern reciprocating elements produce less "whip it GOOD"



posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 03:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
All the big Democrats are having heart attacks and fits over the massive exposures this year.

All their cheap talk about conspiracies has caught up with them.

Just count all the liars that have been exposed by all the government reports and leaks.

Obama is his own victim.



At the expense of the thread's trajectory, quite soon to
inevitably resemble a badminton bird outa some Mossberg:
the already blatant vote counting and "misplacement/mail-in
ballot reconditioning issues" have snowballed even before
the early voting interval has passed.

I feel for the first time, X.. that the Dems' three fingers
pointing back at themselves are staying on camera for the
first time. Hey there is no first time twice, it's a psyop ROFL.
If we're lucky: for both major cabals, to the advan-
tage of some other faction to come in someday and clean house.

edit on 5-11-2016 by derfreebie because: Do as I SPRAY.

edit on 5-11-2016 by derfreebie because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 03:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: derfreebie
Obama:"The FBI Should Not Be Used as a Political Tool"


Neither should the Internal Revenue Service.



posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 04:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: derfreebie
Obama:"The FBI Should Not Be Used as a Political Tool"


Neither should the Internal Revenue Service.


Bravo, Augie. And again thanks for showing up to reinforce
my obvious and unfounded paranoia.
But you know, I always thought Kosinen looked a lot like Bob
Woolsey. I like him just fine when whole cultures aren't getting
86'd. But it's a stinkin' job, somebody's got to do it...
And whatever happened to the brunette? Off on her desert
island with the cocktail server in the sarong? 501 see HERE...
And besides selective enforcement is just that: tyranny. We
just get to pick our priorities based on the greatest threat
to the agenda.. er public interest. "Save the Giblets!" Julia Child



posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 04:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: derfreebie
Obama:"The FBI Should Not Be Used as a Political Tool"


Neither should the Internal Revenue Service.


Nor the DOJ. It seems that the FBI had to revolt aganst the DOJ (with Obama calling all DOJ shots). Is it ok for an agency to stop something corrupt and politically based and at a higher level, essentially their higher command? That could be termed a political move by a 'tool', but if its a move to eradicate corruption from those in power then most people are behind them.

Total hypocrisy on Obama's part.



posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 05:28 PM
link   
a reply to: derfreebie

But Obama is a political tool...why not?



posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 05:34 PM
link   
a reply to: derfreebie

Indeed, Derfreebie, you do appear to be in a stupor, judging by the content of your post. At least we agree about this.



posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 05:56 PM
link   
damn!



I got beat!!







edit on 11 5 2016 by burgerbuddy because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 05:57 PM
link   
All I have to say is, Barry, STFU and just swish off into the dustbin of history.



posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 06:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: derfreebie
Obama:"The FBI Should Not Be Used as a Political Tool"


Neither should the Internal Revenue Service.


You beat me to it! And I was so excited to type that. Thought I was clever



posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 11:10 PM
link   
a reply to: derfreebie

A passing familiarity, but I can gather the gist from the context clues left in your previous missive, which was surprisingly coherent to moi.

[knowing chuckle]

Indeed on your other point, whichever universe has the unfortunate happenstance to gifted by our taint certainly will experience a net loss in their grand unified equation and I imagine they'll begin to wonder where it all began to go off the rails.

You know...


There's this theory that say that if anyone ever figures out just what the universe is for and what its purpose is, it will suddenly cease to exist only to be replaced by something much more bizarre and complex.


There is another theory that say this has already happened...

Maybe where the unlucky recipient of a prior collision with a plane wherein corruption and collusion are admired?




top topics



 
14

log in

join