More Pizza Talk

originally posted by: Navieko
a reply to: Throes
I thought it was widely accepted here on ATS that 0HOUR1 is a bit of a BSer - so I'll believe it when I see it (actually I don't want to "see" it, but you know what I mean).

I agree, but he was working with someone else and the person who he was working with posted a public URL instead of DMing 0hour1 and people were disgusted when they clicked on the link. They've been tracing girls connected to Epstein / Clinton.

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: projectvxn
I'm not sure how I feel about this.

I spent about 30 minutes last night searching through all of the listed keywords for these email strings.

If you think in context of child sex trafficking this kind of code makes sense.

However the skeptic in me says that just because it makes sense doesn't mean that's what they are talking about.

I know, but for every other email that fits the puzzle ... it just gets worse and worse looking.

Any one of them by itself and you can dismiss it as something add. Start putting them all together ... and it starts getting harder and harder to look the other way, the sane way.

I don't want this to be true at all.

Kids should never be harmed in any way. Something like this would be unconscionable.

a reply to: projectvxn

That twitter guy is incomprehensible. Tweet after tweet of vague, suggestive, inconclusive remarks and odd out-of-context photos that could signify something or nothing at all.

I quit scrolling back through his timeline to see if I could pick any sense out of it, when I came across a tweet promising a big revelation to be made in one hour's time... that tweet was posted nine hours ago and no such revelation has appeared.

If there's something going on that he's aware of, he's not exactly doing his best to keep the world informed.

I am still undecided about what all the food references mean - I don't want to believe what people are saying.

They are saying that one of the people involved in the pedo stuff with Epstein worked with the Secret Service.
Waris Ahluwalia.
deplorable stew twitter
There is a photo up on his twitter of Bill Clinton with an underage Rachel Chandler, said to be taken on the Lolita Express.

originally posted by: UKTruth
I don't want to believe what people are saying.

Right. But you are perfectly willing to believe this (on first blush):
www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: UKTruth
I am still undecided about what all the food references mean - I don't want to believe what people are saying.

I am with you on that one....seems pretty hard to believe.


Reminds me very very much of that satanic pre-school scandal thing we went through back in the early 80's.

People went absolutely bat poop crazy and quite a few innocent people went to jail, lost their spouses, careers....

Turned out to be mostly made up stories and false memories implanted in children. People were later exonerated, but their reputations were destroyed.

en.wikipedia.org...

The Kern County child abuse case was the first prominent instance of accusations of ritualized sex abuse of children. In 1982 in Kern County, California, Debbie and Alvin McCuan were accused of abusing their own children. The initial charges were made by Mary Ann Barbour, the children's step-grandmother, who had a history of mental illness. Coercive interviewing techniques were used by the authorities to elicit disclosures of parental sexual abuse from the children. In 1982, the girls also accused McCuan's defense witnesses: Scott Kniffen, his wife Brenda, and his mother. Mary Ann Barbour reported that the children had been used for prostitution and child pornography, tortured, and forced to watch snuff films.[3] In 1984, all of the McCuans and the Kniffens was sentenced to over 240 years in prison. Their convictions were overturned in 1996.

Ever since then, I take all that stuff with a huge grain of salt.

originally posted by: audubon
a reply to: projectvxn

That twitter guy is incomprehensible. Tweet after tweet of vague, suggestive, inconclusive remarks and odd out-of-context photos that could signify something or nothing at all.

I quit scrolling back through his timeline to see if I could pick any sense out of it, when I came across a tweet promising a big revelation to be made in one hour's time... that tweet was posted nine hours ago and no such revelation has appeared.

If there's something going on that he's aware of, he's not exactly doing his best to keep the world informed.

His posting was referencing the leak that came out today as Part 1.

He is definitely hard to follow, but I only posted it because if you read through he's collaborating with other twitter accounts, one who apparently posted some off color stuff by accident.

It appears they are a group of people trying to connect all the dots, one of those being a former SS agent from the Clinton era who is associated with the ring.

a reply to: Phage

Lol pretty sure you still believe Trump raped that 13 year old girl.

Because you know just look at him..

a reply to: Phage

Lol pretty sure you still believe Trump raped that 13 year old girl.

Because you know just look at him..

a reply to: Phage

BTW. How do you feel about our president talking to dead people?

I know you have ridiculed countless posters on here for years for things like that.

a reply to: goou111
You can assume anything you wish about what I believe, in lieu of my statements about anything in particular.

a reply to: audubon
Thanks for clearing that up.

The use of the word 'pizza' still seems like code though. Who brings only one pizza slice to divide among several people? If it's not code, I guess everyone in the office was on a strict low-carb diet.

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: UKTruth
I don't want to believe what people are saying.

Right. But you are perfectly willing to believe this (on first blush):
www.abovetopsecret.com...

What has that got to do with this thread?
My sentiment about not wanting to believe the pizza references is down to the fact i don't want to believe that child sex rings operate at this level.
This election really has shown you in a new light.

a reply to: UKTruth

What has that got to do with this thread?

That you tend to answer to dog whistles?

My sentiment about not wanting to believe the pizza references is down to the fact i don't want to believe that child sex rings operate at this level.

My mistake.
I thought you meant that even the Clinton campaign could not be that bad.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: UKTruth

What has that got to do with this thread?

That you tend to answer to dog whistles?

My sentiment about not wanting to believe the pizza references is down to the fact i don't want to believe that child sex rings operate at this level.

My mistake.
I thought you meant that even the Clinton campaign could not be that bad.

We have two dogs whistling constantly at us, so we're all answering to one or the other it seems.

And no, as I mentioned on another thread, I just can't bring myself to believe that society is so bad that child sex rings could be run by the people who are supposed to stop them. That sentiment has nothing to do with any particular politician.

a reply to: UKTruth

We have two dogs whistling constantly at us, so we're all answering to one or the other it seems.

I lost my sensitivity to high frequency noise a while back.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: UKTruth

I lost my sensitivity to high frequency noise a while back.

I starred you because at least it was funny.
I am not so sure you recognise your response though

a reply to: UKTruth

I am not so sure you recognise your response though

I'm not sure you understood it.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: UKTruth

I am not so sure you recognise your response though

I'm not sure you understood it.

Lol. maybe not. It's late.
I assume you meant you'd tuned out all dog whistling. no?