It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

An ATS Christmas present. How about a site wide unbanning?

page: 1
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 04:50 PM
link   
There are alot of good members that have faced the ban hammer and I am sure they are all sorry by now.

So why not just let bygones be bygones and for Christmas forgive and forget .

It just seems like it would be a good thing to do after this ridiculous election season.


edit on 4-11-2016 by goou111 because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 04:51 PM
link   
I too am an Anarchist



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 04:52 PM
link   
Anyone that has been banned probably signed up with a new email and username and was back on in 10 minutes.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 04:52 PM
link   
LOL everyone that has ever been banned has eventually came back with a new name and etc.. it common to watch yet overlook previous bad behavior.. unless they start in on the new acct. It wouldnt be much of a present.

Now some coin in my paypal would be a nice one... or a chat.
HIIIINT!



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 04:53 PM
link   
Yea we have lost some A+++ members lately. Sounds like a good idea to me.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 04:55 PM
link   
Unless they set up a secondary account, I think all they would have to do is email and ask for forgiveness. I haven't ever been banned, but I have been put in the corner for a week-ish.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 04:56 PM
link   
a reply to: goou111

I recently realized one of the nicest members was band and can't imagine why. Never participated in politics. Not sure what happened.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 04:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: iTruthSeeker
Yea we have lost some A+++ members lately. Sounds like a good idea to me.


So many threads with big flag counts and authors that are gone.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 04:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: goou111

I recently realized one of the nicest members was band and can't imagine why. Never participated in politics. Not sure what happened.


The list is long lol



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: goou111

originally posted by: iTruthSeeker
Yea we have lost some A+++ members lately. Sounds like a good idea to me.


So many threads with big flag counts and authors that are gone.


A member I really liked and enjoyed their threads... which were NUMEROUS and GOOD... was banned. Havent seen them in a few years. I dont question it. Its not lke one mod got into a tizzy.. its more a group decision. It had t be something they decided was enough for a banning. Be sure to know this is a dictatorship... and head dick knows whats in the best interestsd of the board. I just accept it all.. so should you.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:01 PM
link   
a reply to: goou111


V

Hey why not, we could open the prisons too and let out all the bad guys, give them some arms and money and turn them loose on the city.

We were going to execute you but what the hell, its 'Christmas'.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:01 PM
link   
a reply to: goou111
I take it you mean "site-wide".
You realise this would logically include [SNIP]


edit on 11/4/2016 by kosmicjack because: no discussion of banned members



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:02 PM
link   
We don't discuss banned members here.

Nothing stops anyone from starting another account after being banned, but continuing the behaviour that got them banned in the first place is only going to get them banned again.

The Terms & Conditions are the measure by which any moderator action takes place. Everyone here agreed to that or they wouldn't be here at all.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: goou111
I take it you mean "site-wide".
You realise this would logically include [SNIP]?



AND.. He Who Must Not Be Named...

edit on 11/4/2016 by kosmicjack because: no discussion of banned members



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:04 PM
link   

edit on 4-11-2016 by Jdennis10 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Advantage

That's right. Naming banned members will only get a moderator response.




posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: goou111


V

Hey why not, we could open the prisons too and let out all the bad guys, give them some arms and money and turn them loose on the city.

We were going to execute you but what the hell, its 'Christmas'.


Well that is a stretch.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:09 PM
link   
a reply to: goou111

Is it?



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: goou111
I take it you mean "site-wide".
You realise this would logically include [snipped]



Lol Maybe I wanted people to see it. Ty fixed now.
edit on 11.7.2016 by Kandinsky because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: masqua
a reply to: goou111

Is it?


Yes comparing prisoners to anonymous banned ATS members is a stretch.



new topics

top topics



 
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join