It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Some topics deserve multiple threads, this is one of them
Twitter 1 Human Cake
Twitter 2 African
Why? What's wrong with this? I don't see anything illegal here.
Because it's effing gross. what's wrong with you?
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Some topics deserve multiple threads, this is one of them
Twitter 1 Human Cake
Twitter 2 African
Why? What's wrong with this? I don't see anything illegal here.
I don't think legality is what's at issue here so much as you would like to believe that you can hold anyone at all who is the company and has a vested interest in a candidate for the most powerful nation on Earth, to a higher standard than dark ages blood baths.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Some topics deserve multiple threads, this is one of them
Twitter 1 Human Cake
Twitter 2 African
Why? What's wrong with this? I don't see anything illegal here.
I don't think legality is what's at issue here so much as you would like to believe that you can hold anyone at all who is the company and has a vested interest in a candidate for the most powerful nation on Earth, to a higher standard than dark ages blood baths.
Do a little research on the book:
Spirit Cooking was the first project Jacob Samuel produced with his portable aquatint box, working with Abramovic—a performance artist with little printmaking experience—in her Amsterdam studio. The artist chose to make a cookbook, writing a series of "aphrodisiac recipes" that serve as evocative instructions for actions or thoughts.
townhall.com...
Why precisely would I do that? It doesn't interest me. The only thing that interests me is that comeone vying for a candidate would be included as part of the "inner circle" that should actually be invited to one of these "aphrodisiac recipe" orgies.
I'm no avant garde too cool for school grunge wearing emo kid... I'm a blue collar working American that honestly doesn't want to see that become the next ritualistic 'heil Clinton'
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Some topics deserve multiple threads, this is one of them
Twitter 1 Human Cake
Twitter 2 African
Why? What's wrong with this? I don't see anything illegal here.
I don't think legality is what's at issue here so much as you would like to believe that you can hold anyone at all who is the company and has a vested interest in a candidate for the most powerful nation on Earth, to a higher standard than dark ages blood baths.
Almost every political candidate in this country believes in ancient myths and occult. They call in Christianity. If I can accept them believing that then I can accept people doing what they are doing in the OP.
originally posted by: introvert
Spirit cooking is a "cookbook".
Ya know, recipes and such...not devil worship or sacrifices.
Edit: It is considered a form of art by the author and many others.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: alphabetaone
Why precisely would I do that? It doesn't interest me. The only thing that interests me is that comeone vying for a candidate would be included as part of the "inner circle" that should actually be invited to one of these "aphrodisiac recipe" orgies.
Who cares? As long as nothing illegal happened, it's none of your business.
I'm no avant garde too cool for school grunge wearing emo kid... I'm a blue collar working American that honestly doesn't want to see that become the next ritualistic 'heil Clinton'
I can just imagine the nasty things you do in your own home, but I still wouldn't care.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Some topics deserve multiple threads, this is one of them
Twitter 1 Human Cake
Twitter 2 African
Why? What's wrong with this? I don't see anything illegal here.
I don't think legality is what's at issue here so much as you would like to believe that you can hold anyone at all who is the company and has a vested interest in a candidate for the most powerful nation on Earth, to a higher standard than dark ages blood baths.
Almost every political candidate in this country believes in ancient myths and occult. They call in Christianity. If I can accept them believing that then I can accept people doing what they are doing in the OP.
There's a pretty big difference, though, between going to Church and singing some hymnals and smearing menstrual blood, semen and breast milk upon a naked woman.
Artistically there is nothing wrong with it...In fact, If I HAD to relate to any relgion at all - I don't - but if I HAD to, I could more easily relate to paganism than any other....As above, So below I get it all....but NOT in the Presidential Race...I draw the line there.
originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall
a reply to: Krazysh0t
It's called standards man. You love to flail your arms in the air when people seem to have a sense of them. Thou doth protest too much about scrupulous behavior. You sir have none. Clearly, you are extremely naive surrounding the ethos of occultists.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Some topics deserve multiple threads, this is one of them
Twitter 1 Human Cake
Twitter 2 African
Why? What's wrong with this? I don't see anything illegal here.
I don't think legality is what's at issue here so much as you would like to believe that you can hold anyone at all who is the company and has a vested interest in a candidate for the most powerful nation on Earth, to a higher standard than dark ages blood baths.
Almost every political candidate in this country believes in ancient myths and occult. They call in Christianity. If I can accept them believing that then I can accept people doing what they are doing in the OP.
There's a pretty big difference, though, between going to Church and singing some hymnals and smearing menstrual blood, semen and breast milk upon a naked woman.
Not to me. It's all hokum and bunk to me.
Artistically there is nothing wrong with it...In fact, If I HAD to relate to any relgion at all - I don't - but if I HAD to, I could more easily relate to paganism than any other....As above, So below I get it all....but NOT in the Presidential Race...I draw the line there.
Uh huh... You sound like those crazies who won't vote for someone who isn't a Christian. In any cases, no loss here you probably weren't going to vote for Clinton anyways. So your opinion here is moot.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Some topics deserve multiple threads, this is one of them
Twitter 1 Human Cake
Twitter 2 African
Why? What's wrong with this? I don't see anything illegal here.
I don't think legality is what's at issue here so much as you would like to believe that you can hold anyone at all who is the company and has a vested interest in a candidate for the most powerful nation on Earth, to a higher standard than dark ages blood baths.
Almost every political candidate in this country believes in ancient myths and occult. They call in Christianity. If I can accept them believing that then I can accept people doing what they are doing in the OP.
There's a pretty big difference, though, between going to Church and singing some hymnals and smearing menstrual blood, semen and breast milk upon a naked woman.
Not to me. It's all hokum and bunk to me.
Artistically there is nothing wrong with it...In fact, If I HAD to relate to any relgion at all - I don't - but if I HAD to, I could more easily relate to paganism than any other....As above, So below I get it all....but NOT in the Presidential Race...I draw the line there.
Uh huh... You sound like those crazies who won't vote for someone who isn't a Christian. In any cases, no loss here you probably weren't going to vote for Clinton anyways. So your opinion here is moot.
The only thing you got right about me, personally, not that I need to share anything about me personally with you, is that I'm not going to vote for Clinton. I'm not going to vote period.
However, let me get this straight, your retort to me and my assertion that I'm not religious AT ALL, is that because of that, I sound like someone who WONT vote for someone unless they're Christian?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Some topics deserve multiple threads, this is one of them
Twitter 1 Human Cake
Twitter 2 African
Why? What's wrong with this? I don't see anything illegal here.
I don't think legality is what's at issue here so much as you would like to believe that you can hold anyone at all who is the company and has a vested interest in a candidate for the most powerful nation on Earth, to a higher standard than dark ages blood baths.
Almost every political candidate in this country believes in ancient myths and occult. They call in Christianity. If I can accept them believing that then I can accept people doing what they are doing in the OP.
There's a pretty big difference, though, between going to Church and singing some hymnals and smearing menstrual blood, semen and breast milk upon a naked woman.
Not to me. It's all hokum and bunk to me.
Artistically there is nothing wrong with it...In fact, If I HAD to relate to any relgion at all - I don't - but if I HAD to, I could more easily relate to paganism than any other....As above, So below I get it all....but NOT in the Presidential Race...I draw the line there.
Uh huh... You sound like those crazies who won't vote for someone who isn't a Christian. In any cases, no loss here you probably weren't going to vote for Clinton anyways. So your opinion here is moot.
The only thing you got right about me, personally, not that I need to share anything about me personally with you, is that I'm not going to vote for Clinton. I'm not going to vote period.
Considering that's the only thing I said about you then I'm batting 1000.
However, let me get this straight, your retort to me and my assertion that I'm not religious AT ALL, is that because of that, I sound like someone who WONT vote for someone unless they're Christian?
I said you sound like that because you are making up excuses involving people's alleged religious activities to not vote for someone instead of citing reasons involving policy decisions.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Some topics deserve multiple threads, this is one of them
Twitter 1 Human Cake
Twitter 2 African
Why? What's wrong with this? I don't see anything illegal here.
I don't think legality is what's at issue here so much as you would like to believe that you can hold anyone at all who is the company and has a vested interest in a candidate for the most powerful nation on Earth, to a higher standard than dark ages blood baths.
Almost every political candidate in this country believes in ancient myths and occult. They call in Christianity. If I can accept them believing that then I can accept people doing what they are doing in the OP.
There's a pretty big difference, though, between going to Church and singing some hymnals and smearing menstrual blood, semen and breast milk upon a naked woman.
Not to me. It's all hokum and bunk to me.
Artistically there is nothing wrong with it...In fact, If I HAD to relate to any relgion at all - I don't - but if I HAD to, I could more easily relate to paganism than any other....As above, So below I get it all....but NOT in the Presidential Race...I draw the line there.
Uh huh... You sound like those crazies who won't vote for someone who isn't a Christian. In any cases, no loss here you probably weren't going to vote for Clinton anyways. So your opinion here is moot.
The only thing you got right about me, personally, not that I need to share anything about me personally with you, is that I'm not going to vote for Clinton. I'm not going to vote period.
Considering that's the only thing I said about you then I'm batting 1000.
However, let me get this straight, your retort to me and my assertion that I'm not religious AT ALL, is that because of that, I sound like someone who WONT vote for someone unless they're Christian?
I said you sound like that because you are making up excuses involving people's alleged religious activities to not vote for someone instead of citing reasons involving policy decisions.
Please point out the instance where I said 2 things:
1) Where I made accusation of people's religious involvement
2) Where I suggested anyone to NOT vote for anyone
I'll be waiting....(in case this isn't amazingly obvious, it's rhetorical as I already know I haven't, I'm just waiting to see what your twist will be on it)
Artistically there is nothing wrong with it...In fact, If I HAD to relate to any relgion at all - I don't - but if I HAD to, I could more easily relate to paganism than any other....As above, So below I get it all....but NOT in the Presidential Race...I draw the line there.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Some topics deserve multiple threads, this is one of them
Twitter 1 Human Cake
Twitter 2 African
Why? What's wrong with this? I don't see anything illegal here.
I don't think legality is what's at issue here so much as you would like to believe that you can hold anyone at all who is the company and has a vested interest in a candidate for the most powerful nation on Earth, to a higher standard than dark ages blood baths.
Almost every political candidate in this country believes in ancient myths and occult. They call in Christianity. If I can accept them believing that then I can accept people doing what they are doing in the OP.
There's a pretty big difference, though, between going to Church and singing some hymnals and smearing menstrual blood, semen and breast milk upon a naked woman.
Not to me. It's all hokum and bunk to me.
Artistically there is nothing wrong with it...In fact, If I HAD to relate to any relgion at all - I don't - but if I HAD to, I could more easily relate to paganism than any other....As above, So below I get it all....but NOT in the Presidential Race...I draw the line there.
Uh huh... You sound like those crazies who won't vote for someone who isn't a Christian. In any cases, no loss here you probably weren't going to vote for Clinton anyways. So your opinion here is moot.
The only thing you got right about me, personally, not that I need to share anything about me personally with you, is that I'm not going to vote for Clinton. I'm not going to vote period.
Considering that's the only thing I said about you then I'm batting 1000.
However, let me get this straight, your retort to me and my assertion that I'm not religious AT ALL, is that because of that, I sound like someone who WONT vote for someone unless they're Christian?
I said you sound like that because you are making up excuses involving people's alleged religious activities to not vote for someone instead of citing reasons involving policy decisions.
Please point out the instance where I said 2 things:
1) Where I made accusation of people's religious involvement
2) Where I suggested anyone to NOT vote for anyone
I'll be waiting....(in case this isn't amazingly obvious, it's rhetorical as I already know I haven't, I'm just waiting to see what your twist will be on it)
This is what prompted me to say what I said:
Artistically there is nothing wrong with it...In fact, If I HAD to relate to any relgion at all - I don't - but if I HAD to, I could more easily relate to paganism than any other....As above, So below I get it all....but NOT in the Presidential Race...I draw the line there.
Again I said you SOUND like one of those people. I didn't label you one. Syntax is important, mate. When I type words I use specific ones for a reason.