It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: zosimov
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Christs blood is just blood
Pretty sure the gospel would disagree with this statement! Afterall, it was Christ's precious blood which was shed to save all of mankind..
But the point of the OP is not exactly to nitpick of the type (though I find it a bit fascinating, don't you?) but rather wondering if anyone has a recollection of it being found as AB neg, whereas it is now showing up to be positive.
Don't worry, Jesus's message resonates with me whichever type his blood is.
ok really is bedtime now. G'Nite all.
originally posted by: digital01anarchy
originally posted by: zosimov
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Christs blood is just blood
Pretty sure the gospel would disagree with this statement! Afterall, it was Christ's precious blood which was shed to save all of mankind..
But the point of the OP is not exactly to nitpick of the type (though I find it a bit fascinating, don't you?) but rather wondering if anyone has a recollection of it being found as AB neg, whereas it is now showing up to be positive.
Don't worry, Jesus's message resonates with me whichever type his blood is.
ok really is bedtime now. G'Nite all.
As a kid i was o- then got tested again ab- I called bs then another test confirmed it. The only conclusion i can come to on why it would be different now is that the first test must of been a mistake.
originally posted by: NerdGoddess
It would be interesting to know what Jesus' blood type was.
-Alee