It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

State Rep. Comments 'Firing Squad' Against Hillary Clinton On Post

page: 3
17
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 07:52 AM
link   
Also, Eric Trump was quoted as saying that David Duke, "desperately deserves a bullet in the head.".

khow.iheart.com...

If I had been saying stuff like this, I'd be getting knocks on my door at 2:30 in the morning from the Secret Service.
edit on 4-11-2016 by Junkheap because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 07:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: DanteGaland

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
Shoot them in the stomach so it sends a message to the rest of the corrupt officials.

No longer will this nonsense be tolerated - you took an oath - obey it or die a horrible death at the hands of justice!



So you ADVOCATE institutionalized violence in America? Are YOU pushing for RADICALIZED action by a dictatorship?



remember when hillary said "we came we saw he died!" and then produced an evil laugh fit for a tv villian? she was talking about when USA funded rebels raped gaddafi to death with a bayonet.

this is ats, were all well versed in the clinton death count. its going to take more than a few capitalized words to convince us that this woman deserves better than a firing squad.

she deserves much worse.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 08:04 AM
link   
a reply to: gmoneystunt

Gmoneystunt,

Yes, I believe we are suffering from a failure to communicate here...

My point of view is this. Whether Hilary has or has not committed capital crimes is irrelevant at this stage. If she has, calling for her arrest is a fair shout, and no one would argue that point unless they were totally against justice as a concept.

However, America today is in a fair degree of turmoil over this election, and it brings the crazy out in people. To suggest a firing squad these days, when we already know that people have been shot over much less, as in the Giffords case, virtually invites some lunatic to have a crack at cutting through the red tape and putting a round or two in the woman now, rather than after a trial.

Not so long back, a British politician was shot outside her constituency office, by a neo-Nazi thug who was screaming about treason. He also stood over her body, and assaulted her with a knife to boot. This happened in the run up to the EU referendum, in a nation where carrying any kind of firearm in public is strictly forbidden, and firearm ownership generally HEAVILY regulated, such that owners are statistically irrelevant as a cross section of society.

I am no Hilary fan, far, FAR from it. But to suggest a firing squad in the manner that the republican representative did, is a very irresponsible act given the circumstances in which the United States finds itself today. There are far more guns there, and feelings are far more strained than they were here in the UK, when we lost a totally innocent, relatively decent politician.

Hilary is neither decent nor even slightly innocent, and getting her offed by speaking unwisely, at the hand of some lunatic, will only make things worse, not better for the country. That is what I am getting at. It would only be used to crack down even further on freedom of political speech. The man had the freedom to say what he did, but the consequences could be disasterous, especially if they are spun a certain way. Hence my calling it irresponsible.
edit on 4-11-2016 by TrueBrit because: Grammatical error removed



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 09:01 AM
link   
a reply to: TrueBrit

I do appreciate your elaboration on this topic. That neo-Nazi thug is different that using a firing squad after conviction. I think you are taking the state representatives words out of context. He was not calling for a random lunatic to shoot her. He only said firing squad with a picture. Granted, I think he should had elaborated more during that post. Well he did afterwards



“If anyone else had done that they would be charged with treason and thrown under the jail at a minimum, and a firing squad likely,” he wrote to the Oklahoman.
Read more at www.wnd.com...


Treason is no longer handled by firing squads. I personally would not had said that. I think the point they are making is, how serious the nature of the crime is. I do not think that the state rep. considered the fact that he may have an influence on a lunatic but then again lunatics can still make their own decisions.

The state rep. would not need to make that statement if Hillary's situation was handled correctly. With corruption you will always have people rebelling. I do not see much wrong with what the state rep. said. Considering that it was not a direct threat and you can not control stray uncontrollable lunatics




edit on 4-11-2016 by gmoneystunt because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 09:17 AM
link   
a reply to: gmoneystunt

I empathise with your point.

I just believe that because there are lunatics out there, and plenty of them too, it would have been a damned sight more responsible not to have handled this with an image of a target and the words firing squad.

Perhaps his entirely justified comment afterward, should have been posted first to ensure a lack of misunderstanding?



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 09:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: DanteGaland

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: yuppa
COnsidering the charges


Exactly what charges would they be?


The Ones Yet to be outlined for Treason. Just having that server was against th eFederal law you know. Notice i didnt specify because they havent officially charged her yet? So stop CHERRY PICKING. And Post my entire sentence.


SHOW ME THE CHARGES! SHOW ME THE INDICTMENT(S)!

So, instead of cherry picking -- how about not conclusion JUMPING and ASSUMING?

Shockingly, opinion does NOT equal reality. OR fact.

EDIT: My first line should be read in a Jerry Maguire voice.


people are convicted on opinion all the time.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 09:43 PM
link   
People need to understand what a threat is ad isnt it seems. Hell, I learned that as a kid. "Im going to kick your ass" is a threat. " Oh I wish youd * or you should * go play in the street and die" is NOT a threat.

Hillary should be shot by firing squad until dead if and when convicted of treason.

Though Id find it more entertaining with a public hanging ( I know a few out of work guys who USED to own contracting companies who would build it for free even) or maybe stocks so we could throw tomatoes and dog turds at her until dead. I mean with a latex glove..



posted on Nov, 5 2016 @ 12:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Advantage

Ill go with hang her naked and not snap her neck so she pees herself for 100 alex.



new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join