It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Entered Into Evidence - The case for the United States v. Hillary Clinton - Paid Riot Squads

page: 6
72
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 06:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: DJW001

Well at first galcne it was as if you were being a smart arse in blaming Trump for all the violence. Now we're down to grade school edumacation stuff.

Just spit it out already.


Here's a clue:





posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 06:43 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Still dont get it. Keep plugging away at it though and sooner or later we'll all be privy to this profound whatever it is.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 08:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: JoshuaCox


Define collusion....



Collusion Law & Legal Definition

Collusion occurs when two persons or representatives of an entity or organization make an agreement to deceive or mislead another. Such agreements are usually secretive, and involve fraud or gaining an unfair advantage over a third party, competitors, consumers or others with whom they are negotiating. The collusion, therefore, makes the bargaining process inherently unfair. Collusion can involve price or wage fixing, kickbacks, or misrepresenting the independence of the relationship betweeen the colluding parties.

For example, in a divorce action, the husband and wife may agree to fabricate a story or suppress evidence to provide evidence of lawful grounds for a divorce. As another example, collusion may involve cooperation between competing sellers, in the form of an agreement, express or tacit, limiting competition, or a merger or other means to raise the market price above the competitive level.


uslegal.com

The example of the DNC working together with the Hillary campaign to deny Bernie the nomination is collusion.

 


From the Podesta Emails:



podesta-emails/emailid/19461

btw, this is in a conversation began by Stan Greenberg, Seth Rich's former employer on how to change Hillary's message. It shows that even as late as January, her internal people do not know what Hillary actually stands for and that her message is not considered genuine by the people it is to whom it is to appeal.



There was no collusion against Bernie..

The worst email was just asking if Sanders had been made to admit he was an atheist... that he pivoted to having a Jewish heritage..

Well no one even asked him that question.


All of the issues you listed are a problem with the system not the clintons specifically.

Pay for play is not illegal for elected officials..our entire political system is built on pay for play...crappy yes..HRC specific? Not at all..




Unless some more info comes out, they have commited no crime.

It is election smoke and mirrors.


That said, at least the Donald is claiming he will address the issue...

I just don't like the propaganda



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:02 PM
link   

edit on 3-11-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:05 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox


BS. The level of crooked bribes and crooked campaign financing and crooked scheming and and crooked electioneering practices has never been so bare knuckle balls to the wall as what we've seen here with the Clinton's. They trump the Bush's on their best year at least ten fold.

And the emails show Bernie was definitely colluded against. I've read MOST of the important ones. Have you???
edit on 3-11-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

And the Republican Party invented COMMUNISM! That's right, a Republican President issued an Executive Order that robbed thousands of Americans of their private property, and that is a FACT!




A gem of a statement right there !!




posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

There was no collusion against Bernie..

The worst email was just asking if Sanders had been made to admit he was an atheist... that he pivoted to having a Jewish heritage..



except the DNC itself was active against Sanders remember...

Newest WikiLeaks email dump proves DNC officials colluded to secure Clinton nomination




posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:16 PM
link   
a reply to: BrokedownChevy




posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:17 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

It then got twisted into the executive order was really what caused all the racial tensions etc. I cant even make this stuff up!



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 10:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss


I'm not conservative or a "Republican", so those deflections wont work here.



REALLLLYYYY?! Then why are you trying so hard to discredit the DEMs and defending the GOP?



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 10:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

12 years ago I began at tearing down the Bush's & "Republicans" the same as I've done now. 8 years of them was a disaster.

This year I'm back again with the same tenacity as ever to stop the Clinton's & "Democrat's". 8 years of Obama/Clinton's following 8 years of Bush's (that followed 8 years of clintons, and 12 years of Bush's)... I had given up on it for some years. "Inevitable'. 'Futile'. And then this year I finally got around to seeing the results of 8 years of Obama/Clinton's and had to get back in the struggle against our perpetual oppressors. There's not much hope left for the nation at this point, the economy, so much more; but if we can at least stop it from going full tilt FORTH REICH, then even just that would be a massive victory at this point.

You wouldn't get this perspective buying into the fantasy that They are selling on the Toob (that we are all raised on), by that's the view from reality. It's all a lie. If these statements have you scratching your head, thinking I'm 'crazy', etc, then please do read my series here.
edit on 3-11-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 10:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

Here's a clue:



Is that President Edgar Allen Poe? I didn't know he was a Republican?

I give up on this mystery you're spinning here.


edit on 3-11-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 11:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert



That's possible, considering that one video is recorded at a party and another in a bar.



I would expect that the easiest way to get people talking would be to get them drunk (unless you're a hot blonde perhaps).


Do you have what percentage of the clips / what clips are to be disregarded until the full release?

We're all waiting anxiously....



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 11:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

Define collusion....

You do know that pay for play and insider trading are legal for elected officials right???


You do know that if you donate a million bucks to any candidate from any party, they will meet with you right??


Do you think there is ANY politician that hasn't done the exact same type stuff as Clinton??

Accusing the system of corruption is fair, but pretending like the clintons are more corrupt than the rest of them shows a lack of ability to look at something as it is..and not how it is sold to you by unaccredited, unaccountable conspiracy sites.


Please provide for us any other politician that has taken it even half as far as the Clinton's. It's absolutely stunning just how they've take it. Like having Phd's in Criminal Political Corruption; writing the book on it.


And are you seriously confusing "getting to meet with someone" with the high lever cronyism we're seeing come to light with the Clinton's, lately

DO note the WikiLeak's etc et al are confirming soo many of the suspicions everyone had all along. I guess you guys were used to the allegations, so seeing it all 'brought back up' might not be 'shocking'.

I expect a year ago in the face of the same allegations you same lot were in here denying and rejecting the notions. Now that its all coming out VERIFIED you guys are calling it business as usual, no matter how damning and ugly it gets you just keep chuggerin' along.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 11:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Nice work bud must take you hours on end to repost the same garbage in different format, different tittle and different fake news sources.

4 days to go.


The propensity of your lot to trash on people, the disrespect level, is deplorable.

I took showmanship to the next level with this piece, worked hard at it, and damn dude...

It's not like it's all paparazzi trash like the bulk of the democrat talking points.

If you did a piece 1/10 of this I wouldn't disrespect you on the effort 9still waiting for you to tackle any of the specific subject matter...).

with people like you.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: DJW001

Still dont get it. Keep plugging away at it though and sooner or later we'll all be privy to this profound whatever it is.


You have revealed your profound ignorance of American history. The first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln, issued the Emancipation Proclamation, robbing thousands of law abiding slave holders of their personal property, in gross violation of the Constitution. This released thousands of uneducated, rootless Africans into the country. Progressive Republican laws sought to integrate these former slaves into a society that had been structured to reject them. This is why southern states tended to vote Democratic, and many of those "Dixiecrats," as they were called, also joined the Klan.

Meanwhile, in the industrial North, the Republican party's progressivism tended to attract the college educated. These men (voters were all men then) went on to become businessmen, and the Republican party naturally favored Capital: low taxes, free trade... what you might call "globalism." The Democratic party in the North attracted the immigrants arriving from Europe to work in the factories. They naturally favored Labor, and enjoyed support from the unions.

Do you disagree? If so, why?
edit on 4-11-2016 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:09 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

So..... the eugenicists were mostly all southerners? Since you just summed up 150 years of American History in 2 paragraphs, um yeah what else am I to make of that nice crisp soundbite there?


I could have sworn you had implied that the 'executive order of a republican president caused today's racial tensions'. Not sure how tat is supposed to fit your latest narrative?
edit on 4-11-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 05:34 AM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss


So..... the eugenicists were mostly all southerners?


You have a very short memory. In an earlier post I pointed out that progressive intellectuals found eugenics seductive. They understood Darwin but did not yet understand the nature of the gene. The idea behind Progressivism is that human society is perfectible. Many different political and economic theories have sheltered under this big tent, from Marxism to Libertarianism. The idea that the human species can be improved by practicing good husbandry had its moment. Scientists now understand that the relationship between the genotype and its expression as phenotype is complex.

It is very relevant to this discussion that Donald Trump's father was a believer in eugenics. I know you like videos, so here:




Since you just summed up 150 years of American History in 2 paragraphs, um yeah what else am I to make of that nice crisp soundbite there?


You could reflect that the racial tension in the United States is the result of a century and a half of culturally displaced people being systematically excluded from society.



I could have sworn you had implied that the 'executive order of a republican president caused today's racial tensions'. Not sure how tat is supposed to fit your latest narrative?


Reading comprehension issues? The Emancipation Proclamation was the first executive order that proclaimed that Black lives matter. If you think that Black lives don't matter, your beef is with Abe Lincoln, not Hillary Clinton.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 12:24 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

You really think eugenics is DEAD?

It's just been repackaged and now its back out of the shadows as "Transhumanism". Who are the fountainheads of the transhumanist agenda? All those big silicon valley tech companies, such as Google, whom are all 100% behind Hillary and the SJW agenda. The agenda which both serves to distract humanity from the tech front ushering in Transhumanism, while also prepping society for openly embracing all manner of tech enhanced unicorn trans/post-humans.

Same as doing a case study in modern progressives showing their true racist colors, eugenics is right back smack dab in the middle of progressive things again. All this out of no where media obsession with transgenderism and transexuality but more symptoms of it.

The way you just summed up eugenics, like it was just water under the bridge (tell that to all those Holocaust survivors if there still are any), with your "idea that the human species can be improved by practicing good husbandry" semantics. Good luck with that.

Nice deflection of the fact of the history of eugenics being progressive, by making it Trumps fault.

Nice twist on words and such and such, this big Emancipation Proclamation straw man thingie you worked so hard at. "Culturally dispalced", what? They were supposed to be on the plantations, in the south? What is the point of this excerize even at this point. You're saying Republican Abe Lincoln was a liberal? Would the ending of slavery only have come if not for Abe the 'liberal'? How does that take away from the facts that liberal eugenics fueled the Hitler's entire platform with the scientific racism that he built the Nazi Party platform with? Etc?

Black lives matter, and more than for just being political pawns in pushing liberal ideas and transhumanist eugenics. Eugenics which by the way, well I'll just mere mention Planned Parenthood, its founder, eugenics, blacks. Google all that and enjoy.



posted on Nov, 4 2016 @ 02:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Nice work bud must take you hours on end to repost the same garbage in different format, different tittle and different fake news sources.

4 days to go.


The propensity of your lot to trash on people, the disrespect level, is deplorable.

I took showmanship to the next level with this piece, worked hard at it, and damn dude...

It's not like it's all paparazzi trash like the bulk of the democrat talking points.

If you did a piece 1/10 of this I wouldn't disrespect you on the effort 9still waiting for you to tackle any of the specific subject matter...).

with people like you.


Poor thing did the big bad socialist make your feelings hurt, your propaganda does not pass the smell test.

Go make another fake outraged thread, so you and tour ilk can pass the kleenex around.
edit on 4-11-2016 by dukeofjive696969 because: (no reason given)







 
72
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join