It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Entered Into Evidence - The case for the United States v. Hillary Clinton - Paid Riot Squads

page: 4
72
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 09:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: introvert

AGAIN, which specific parts of the PVA video(s), that help glue all this together, are no good without the full version?????

Note I put most of the stuff on each key player in each their own categories. Easy reference. And the transcript is there too (in case you don't have google).

If it FAKE then instead of just go around saying that how about you do the world a favor and set about destroying it.


Again, we have to have the unedited footage to destroy this thread. You are using source material from a known hoaxer and it is very dishonest of you to ask us to debunk something without having access to that footage.




I would bet dollars to donuts Okeefe
Got him drunk and asked him "hypothetically how would you rig the election (per say)" then Okeefe cuts out the hypothetical part...


I think that's why his wording is weird..




That's possible, considering that one video is recorded at a party and another in a bar.

There is no way to verify the validity of these videos without the original footage. I've talked to PV myself and they absolutely refuse to release it.

There's a reason for that.




posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 10:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: introvert

AGAIN, which specific parts of the PVA video(s), that help glue all this together, are no good without the full version?????

Note I put most of the stuff on each key player in each their own categories. Easy reference. And the transcript is there too (in case you don't have google).

If it FAKE then instead of just go around saying that how about you do the world a favor and set about destroying it.


Again, we have to have the unedited footage to destroy this thread. You are using source material from a known hoaxer and it is very dishonest of you to ask us to debunk something without having access to that footage.




I would bet dollars to donuts Okeefe
Got him drunk and asked him "hypothetically how would you rig the election (per say)" then Okeefe cuts out the hypothetical part...


I think that's why his wording is weird..




That's possible, considering that one video is recorded at a party and another in a bar.

There is no way to verify the validity of these videos without the original footage. I've talked to PV myself and they absolutely refuse to release it.

There's a reason for that.




Here is a question though and I haven't been watching real close..but why doesn't the DNC say that?



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 11:03 AM
link   
Amazing work! No matter what we say to the hillary supporters they will ignore and say yeah well where is the smoking gun. Take your pick in this thread normally a faction of this would end someones political carreer for life. Honestly i dont care if she goes to jail i want her out of politics for life. I want soros and the slime balls who fund this crap in jail.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 11:06 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox


Define collusion....



Collusion Law & Legal Definition

Collusion occurs when two persons or representatives of an entity or organization make an agreement to deceive or mislead another. Such agreements are usually secretive, and involve fraud or gaining an unfair advantage over a third party, competitors, consumers or others with whom they are negotiating. The collusion, therefore, makes the bargaining process inherently unfair. Collusion can involve price or wage fixing, kickbacks, or misrepresenting the independence of the relationship betweeen the colluding parties.

For example, in a divorce action, the husband and wife may agree to fabricate a story or suppress evidence to provide evidence of lawful grounds for a divorce. As another example, collusion may involve cooperation between competing sellers, in the form of an agreement, express or tacit, limiting competition, or a merger or other means to raise the market price above the competitive level.


uslegal.com

The example of the DNC working together with the Hillary campaign to deny Bernie the nomination is collusion.

 


From the Podesta Emails:



podesta-emails/emailid/19461

btw, this is in a conversation began by Stan Greenberg, Seth Rich's former employer on how to change Hillary's message. It shows that even as late as January, her internal people do not know what Hillary actually stands for and that her message is not considered genuine by the people it is to whom it is to appeal.
edit on 3-11-2016 by jadedANDcynical because: add on



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 11:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: introvert

AGAIN, which specific parts of the PVA video(s), that help glue all this together, are no good without the full version?????

Note I put most of the stuff on each key player in each their own categories. Easy reference. And the transcript is there too (in case you don't have google).

If it FAKE then instead of just go around saying that how about you do the world a favor and set about destroying it.


Again, we have to have the unedited footage to destroy this thread. You are using source material from a known hoaxer and it is very dishonest of you to ask us to debunk something without having access to that footage.




I would bet dollars to donuts Okeefe
Got him drunk and asked him "hypothetically how would you rig the election (per say)" then Okeefe cuts out the hypothetical part...


I think that's why his wording is weird..




That's possible, considering that one video is recorded at a party and another in a bar.

There is no way to verify the validity of these videos without the original footage. I've talked to PV myself and they absolutely refuse to release it.

There's a reason for that.




Here is a question though and I haven't been watching real close..but why doesn't the DNC say that?


I'm not sure. If I had to guess, I would say that they don't want to waste their time on known hoaxers. The Left gave them too much attention when they released those Planned Parenthood videos.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 12:13 PM
link   
The Democrat MainStreams are not denying anything are they !!

Caught and exposed.

Excellent Thread IIB





posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 01:04 PM
link   
Great post! I wish mainstream "journalists" would do the work putting all this together, but that isn't going to happen. Even without the PVA exhibits, there is plenty of meat here.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 04:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Templeton

Thanks. Well the work has been done for them now, so now what

edit on 3-11-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 04:09 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Laying it out in clean exhibit form I thought it'd be super duper easy for them to work on it. Instead so far I've only noticed sweeping generalizations.

They might as well get started on this one. The world needs to be reminded why The Hillary is still the best thing that ever happened to it.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 04:33 PM
link   
I've got another special release for this series. I already did much/most of the evidence discovery a couple-few weeks ago. So it should go slick; I'd like to say tonight, but hopefully after all night it'll be ready for tomorrow morning. I actually crafted this series to lead in to it.

I'll be clearly demonstrating that the DNC 5+ million civilian strong "National Security Force" is really being built as an SJW army.

Then I'll be turning my attention back to the wikileaks, getting caught up, and have a whole series of mega releases in mind for the weekend...



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 04:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

Most of your threads use alt right blog sites and you pass them as news, this is nothing new here, all your threads are just recycled garbage, but keep up the good work, it separates the weaklings from the heard.


Which threads "use alt right blog sites"? How many threads TOTAL of mine have you ever responded to? What two, three?

Actually review my series here. It's been mostly all science. For example.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 05:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

Most of your threads use alt right blog sites and you pass them as news, this is nothing new here, all your threads are just recycled garbage, but keep up the good work, it separates the weaklings from the heard.


Which threads "use alt right blog sites"? How many threads TOTAL of mine have you ever responded to? What two, three?

Actually review my series here. It's been mostly all science. For example.



You lost any inteligent person when you tried to compare the nazys to hillary and co, calling nazys socialist and such.

Thats some super duper work there bud, enjoy your propaganda.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 05:15 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert



Okay, I'll bite, again...


If we're never to give O'Keefe another chance then that means we also shouldn't give Hillary any breaks on her naming a Robert Bird her mentor (who was given a second chance after being a bigshot in the KKK scene).


Nor should we give Ford another chance for being a inspiration to the KKK:
okieblog.wordpress.com...
Which by the way the Ford Foundation is one of the biggest funders of the BLM to the tune of I think it was $100,000,000.

While we're at it we should never give the DNC / progressives another chance for being the fountainhead of eugenics, and the KKK movement... en.wikipedia.org...
That's putting it lightly (I fear getting banned for posting the real stuff). Google Image: |eugenics racist|



edit on 3-11-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 05:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

You lost any inteligent person when you tried to compare the nazys to hillary and co, calling nazys socialist and such.

Thats some super duper work there bud, enjoy your propaganda.


When did I call the Nazi's Socialist????????????????????????????

If I lost the intelligent people, then what are you doing here?

edit on 3-11-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 05:22 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss


Laying it out in clean exhibit form I thought it'd be super duper easy for them to work on it. Instead so far I've only noticed sweeping generalizations.


The problem is that your presentations are scattershot. You don't actually connect things up in a meaningful way. A lot of the Black Lives Matters protesters were white! Aha! So what? If anything, you are undercutting the message you seem to be going for. Perhaps those white folks were Trump supporters trying to make his opponents look bad? A Democratic campaign organizer-- gasp!-- accepted campaign funds! And, here's the clincher, she participated in anti-Trump protests! That can only be the dark magic of Soros at work. It is impossible to refute your "theories" because you never really have a concise thesis.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 05:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: introvert



Okay, I'll bite, again...


If we're never to give O'Keefe another chance then that means we also shouldn't give Hillary any breaks on her naming a Robert Bird her mentor (who was given a second chance after being a bigshot in the KKK scene).


Nor should we give Ford another chance for being a inspiration to the KKK:
okieblog.wordpress.com...
Which by the way the Ford Foundation is one of the biggest funders of the BLM to the tune of I think it was $100,000,000.

While we're at it we should never give the DNC / progressives another chance for being the fountainhead of eugenics, and the KKK movement... en.wikipedia.org...
That's putting it lightly (I fear getting banned for posting the real stuff). Google Image: |eugenics racist|




A perfect example. A plethora of memes and out of context factoids. The Democratic party of 2016 is no more the Democratic party of 1917 than the Republican party of 2017 is the Republican party of 1917. By pointing to Progressives of prior centuries' embrace of Eugenics-- then accepted as "scientific" in the absence of our present knowledge of genetics-- you are indeed making a tortuous argument that modern Democrats are Nazis.
edit on 3-11-2016 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 05:27 PM
link   
Double post. --DJW001
edit on 3-11-2016 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 05:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

You lost any inteligent person when you tried to compare the nazys to hillary and co, calling nazys socialist and such.

Thats some super duper work there bud, enjoy your propaganda.


When did I call the Nazi's Socialist????????????????????????????

If I lost the intelligent people, then what are you doing here?


Trolling your own threads, magic right there.



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 05:35 PM
link   
Great thread and execution OP!

Besides the Hildawg supporters trying to excuse the witch and support her corruption lol.

Hope they are getting paid for it at least



posted on Nov, 3 2016 @ 05:35 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Except for the part where Bird (via Hillary), and now Ford (via BLM), and the DNC (via Paid Riot Squads) bridge the gap between then and now (we'll even give Soros a break in this mini narrative for being a Nazi collaborator as a child).

This might be a good time for you guys to begin the actual debunking process... here I made you guys a little outline sort of checklist you can work at:

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
SECTIONS

EXHIBITS A1-A5: Historical Contexts

EXHIBITS B1-B3: Project Veritas Action

EXHIBITS C1-C5: Legal Precidents

EXHIBITS D1-D3: Tying Emails

EXHIBITS E1-E6: Craigslist Ads

EXHIBITS F1-F19: Robert Creamer

EXHIBITS G1-G5: Scott Foval

EXHIBITS H1-H6: Aaron Black

EXHIBITS I1-I6: Zulema Rodriguez

EXHIBITS J1-J6: MoveOn PAC

EXHIBITS K1-K18: George Soros

EXHIBITS L1-L8: Black Lives Matter

EXHIBITS M1-M3: DeRay Mckesson

EXHIBITS N1-N5: Supporting Evidence From Various Trump Rallies

edit on 3-11-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
72
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join