It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Or if you'd prefer, imagine all the multiverse lined up next to each other, and we as conscious beings have the ability to affect which of our choices we make and thus decide which universe we are in.
originally posted by: greenreflections
Still, in respect to life...how does physics explain the fact, that to move or accelerate any physical body, force must be applied to it, where I can move in space without any force applied on me? I can get up off my chair and start walking and no force was applied on me..
Do you see thoughts move?
originally posted by: greenreflections
The 'experience' means it is a witness to duration. But how else you can witness anything if you are moving along with everything else? Like in a movie theater...tape is played back moving frames in front of you on movie theater screen. You have to agree that you are stationary (not moving with film frames) to experience the act.
originally posted by: greenreflections
a reply to: Itisnowagain
Do you see thoughts move?
Yes. The thought is a sequence. Sequence has duration before it can be named a 'sequence'. Thought is also a subject to motion. Me, as the one who produces and evaluates thoughts, is stationary. Otherwise, I won't be able to generate any thoughts. I must be stationary to thought flow.
It is wrong to speak of thought while discussing life, imo. Life came to be way before we could think and call it a thought process.
About your video..before I got to the part where re incarnation question comes...
The 'experience' means it is a witness to duration. But how else you can witness anything if you are moving along with everything else? Like in a movie theater...tape is played back moving frames in front of you on movie theater screen. You have to agree that you are stationary (not moving with film frames) to experience the act.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: greenreflections
The 'experience' means it is a witness to duration. But how else you can witness anything if you are moving along with everything else? Like in a movie theater...tape is played back moving frames in front of you on movie theater screen. You have to agree that you are stationary (not moving with film frames) to experience the act.
Yes - you are the stationary screen that the movie is playing on. The screen is always present as the background to all that appears.
originally posted by: greenreflections
The screen is the answer as to what is happening. What the screen could be?
Also, once we know what is the screen, how do we remember a 'moment' ago? Besides projection medium, there must be a mechanism that compares states of matter from 'now' point of view?
Past and future are derived from concrete current state and memory that suggests the probability of 'future' based on the 'past'.
The screen is not any 'thing' but is everything.
Imagine a tv screen - no thing can appear without the screen yet when the tv screen seems to be full of appearing things, the screen is overlooked.
The screen is aware presence.
originally posted by: greenreflections
I think I understand what you say. We, by nature, get too preoccupied with an act on that screen, that it never occur to us that the screen has to be there to begin with? The screen keeps us busy with what is displayed?
Here is a thing. That screen is not just a movie screen. It is an instance that has spece volume where physical world materializes briefly (duration of 'now'. 'Now' has to have a duration since it creates and accommodates sense of dimensional volume).
What is displayed on the 'screen' is very tangible besides only seeing an image of passing events.
May be 'volume' does not exists outside our 'now' experience?
originally posted by: GalzuFromQ
a reply to: dfnj2015
Time is a dimension, not something to be taken linerally.
The screen is consciousness - always present and aware.