It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grambler
And when will one of our so called reporters have the nerve to call Obama out on lying about when he found out about Hillary's private email address?
We now know he emailed her under pseudonyms, and Huma said in the Wikileaks that she had to inform Obama everytime Hillary changed her address.
Why would we listen to Obama on this issue when he has already shown he has lied about it?
Of course he knew about it. He was in on it. He allowed Hillary all the freedom she and Bill wanted to set up their pay-for-play and money-laundering racket through the State Department and Clinton Foundation. That's why he never appointed a permanent Inspector General for the State Dept. during the entire four years she was there. He was complicit.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Greggers
He's basically saying that it is not the role of the FBI to stir the country up into wild speculation before they've come to any conclusion.
Here on ATS, we've got a new thread touting some unconfirmed theory every 5 minutes or so.
But But the warrant was justified when a judge signed it !!!!
Probable cause is based on evidence.
And yet clearly not enough evidence to complete their investigation or even to say whether the emails therein were relevant or even if they had already been reviewed.
The probable cause that justified the warrant was from a different investigation.
That's what Comey wrote in the letter to Congress.
That letter was not released to the public by Comey.
Existing warrant(s) were not valid for a re-opening of the original investigation(s).
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Greggers
He's basically saying that it is not the role of the FBI to stir the country up into wild speculation before they've come to any conclusion.
Here on ATS, we've got a new thread touting some unconfirmed theory every 5 minutes or so.
And yet it was appropriate for him to wildly speculate there was not law broken just as the investigation began?