It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Black Church burned in honor of TRUMP

page: 3
126
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: abe froman
a reply to: MagicCow

The left is really getting desperate now.

This just reeks of false flag politics.


What information in the article leads you to think it was a false flag?

The fact that Trump's name is linked to it. Can't be shattering the fragile bubble that Trump supporters are beacons of good will can we?




posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Snarl

Careful with that one. Recklessly going after freedom of speech is a tough thing to get right. I agree there should be some kind of penalty for companies that bill themselves as "news" that spread deceit but...

On the other side of the coin, if Clinton wins do you really think ATS will still be around? I don't. Freedom of speech should remain protected but, just my opinion, if a company, or individual, says they're a "news agency" then they should be bound by strict honesty regulations or fined, at least.

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to derail, please, go back to your regularly scheduled two-minutes-hate.
edit on 2-11-2016 by Noncents because: Apology - Now with commas!



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Snarl

Breitbart would be first on that list.
Oh wait Breitbart is leading Trumps campaign.
Don't know when the last time you went to Breitbart was but reading
their stories and reading the comments of those that visit their site.
I have to say it is very plausible this was in fact Trump supporters.


+2 more 
posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:10 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Obvious false flag is obvious.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Mandroid7

The original source for the news article is Delta Daily News, whose website is currently down, probably because of the amount of traffic it is getting from members of the public and other news feeds wanting a look too.

Probably a relatively small outfit.

In any case, Huff all you like, but the post was not the origin of the story, so your assumptions about its legitimacy based purely on the author are illegitimate.


HE didn't quote DDN, he quoted Huff PO.

What are you talking about?



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Indeed.

Logic would dictate that we wait for information before we come to any conclusion. It's just as likely it was a Trump supporter as it is a Clinton supporter. It could even be someone that doesn't care about politics and wanted to be a smartass.

But I suppose the knee-jerk reaction is to blame a Clinton supporter because of intellectual laziness.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Snarl
After Trump gets elected ... I hope these agencies "formerly labeled as News Media" ... are stripped of all First Amendment protections. I hope they are all sued out of existence for the falsehoods they've spread.

I guess the 1st Amendment isn't important to you, huh?



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: introvert

Obvious false flag is obvious.


Nothing is obvious when you have very little information.

Blaming a Clinton supporter or screaming false flag is a defensive reaction.


+4 more 
posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: MagicCow
This is what we have come to?


We've come to an extremely gullible and brainwashed population.

No one with any logic or common sense could conclude a Trump supporter, no matter if they are extremely racist, would burn down a black church 6 days before the election to help Trump.

Also take into account that most Christians are voting Trump, they would not burn down a church.

This is the most harped up ridiculous story I've read all election year.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

What makes it an obvious false flag?
Can you link me to the evidence.
I'll add it to the Starting post.




posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:15 PM
link   
I agree, come to the Bronx or Brooklyn and learn all about racism. Just might not fit the narrative.a reply to: underwerks



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: xstealth

No one with any logic or common sense could conclude a Trump supporter, no matter if they are extremely racist, would burn down a black church 6 days before the election to help Trump.

I've seen many Trump supporters operate without logic or common sense so I don't know why this is so inconceivable. It's certainly more plausible that a Trump supporter did this than a Hillary support creating a false flag. Though in any case, there is NO evidence released so far and saying it is anything with definitive certainty is intellectually dishonest.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:17 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth

You and many other Trump supporters feel the same way.
I'm always amused at how Trump supporters feel they're above it all
and know the truths no one else does.
Against Trump and it's a conspiracy!!!!
Against Hillary and it's BREAKING NEWS!!!!

The hypocrisy I think finds a home in all of us.
Yet Trump supporters find threads about Hillary drinking of Hillary being radioactive NEWS WORTHY.

Give me a break.




posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:17 PM
link   
Why is the originator of the stories site dead now?



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:18 PM
link   
Common sense would tell ya it was a Clinton supporter. Trump people burning the church would be bad enough but then tagging it has Clinton all over it.



But common sense isn't so common. See who comes to the rescue!



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:18 PM
link   
a reply to: MagicCow

Just my opinion man. Even a crazed kkk member isn't that stupid.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:21 PM
link   
I can really only see Hilary supporters having motive to do this.


+4 more 
posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: xstealth

No one with any logic or common sense could conclude a Trump supporter, no matter if they are extremely racist, would burn down a black church 6 days before the election to help Trump.

I've seen many Trump supporters operate without logic or common sense so I don't know why this is so inconceivable. It's certainly more plausible that a Trump supporter did this than a Hillary support creating a false flag. Though in any case, there is NO evidence released so far and saying it is anything with definitive certainty is intellectually dishonest.


No, it's not more plausible that a Trump supporter did this than a Hillary supporter.

There is no logic and no benefit for a Trump supporter doing it, but there is a hell of a lot of benefit of a Hillary supporter doing it.

1) Take news cycle off Hillary
2) Brand all Trump supporters as white supremacists.
3) Try to take away the 10-15% support of black voters that Trump currently has to change the outcome of the election.

Benefit of a Trump supporter doing it
1) Rally white supremacists to the polls? Really?



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

If they can convince a few stupid people that it was done by Trump supporters, sure it can affect votes.

Looks like plenty of stupid people around this thread to believe it too.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 01:28 PM
link   
Double post
edit on 2-11-2016 by stolencar18 because: double



new topics

top topics



 
126
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join