I always have in mind many various big 'expose' ideas, and three I will cover as one here are "Globalism: The Religion of Big Multinational
Corporatism", "The mass scale Social Group Warfare (SGW) agenda", as well as "The "Patriarchy" is REAL (but it isn't what 'they' say it is)". I'll
lead in with a sort of "Globalism Vs. Globalization Vs. Multiculturalism Vs. the Global Village Vs. Global Government" approach, on the way to
describing 'who' and 'what' the real "Patriarchy" really is, and why everyone on Earth should care. For this series I have in
mind over a dozen socio/psychological pieces that might ought to come before this, but this one is ready to go, and from this point I'll be able to
define things in terms of the knowledge herein.
Below you will find much material that will come off as being "conspiracy theory". Do note that "the Patriarchy" notion itself is a bonafide
conspiracy theory, and a very young one at that (at least compared to the longstanding 'conspiracy theories' of the true 'Patriarchy'. Therefore, if
you already believe in this whole "Patriarchy" conspiracy theory then you are by definition already a "Conspiracy Theorist". That means we
belong to the same social group, a group which has long been marginalized by defenders of the true "Patriarchy".
For many years we've been seeing a multifaceted of push for "Globalization". During the 2000's I more recall seeing the phrase the "Global Village"
lead-in such dialogs. Now in this decade, that term seems more passé, where "Multiculturalism" has taken its place and is 'all' the buzz now one
More or less, the general premise of the above concepts aren't inherently all that bad sounding, not on their surfaces, or in their spirit. A
lot of 'all that' is coming naturally following mass transit enhanced migration patterns, and ever exceedingly efficient methods of mass
communications. Me, I like exotic. If everybody looked the same, we'd get tired of looking at each other, so the song goes.
Meanwhile, it's critical to understand that before all of that yummy multicultural globalization village stuff there were The Globalists, and their
motives have nothing to do with all of that touchy feely gushy stuff we might perceive to be inherently in all that 'global villagery' globalization
agenda. Instead, it's more about an increasing push towards a multinational corporation + world central banker design of global dominance via the
authority of a world government.
This general agenda has been going on for something like a 100 years now, following the gradual collapse of Colonialism. Globalism better understood
as "Neocolonialism" than any of those other concepts (which are generally spoken with overtones of openness & kindness). Do note that Colonialism was
navy enhanced imperialism, which enabled global empire building, and constitutes one of the darkest annals of human history. Since the advent of mass
communications 100 years ago, brute force imperialism of old is a mostly hopeless endeavor, whereas since the fall of the Nazi's & Imperial
Japan it's only been acceptably possible via the sneaky Cold War, further reduced following that leaving only this notion of the American
Empire being the "Benevolent Empire". All of which enabled solely by mass scale propaganda (via mass communications). Even that push for imperialism
is mostly seen for what it is, except for here in the US.
All of this underscores the only real prospect for a total global empire, which is Globalism. While the idea of globalization isn't inherently bad, it
in practice (by the authority figures & institutions that push for it) keeps proving to be more to the tune of a Globalist push for a global
Thanks to mass scale propaganda, the key 5 terms herein so far have all become interchangeable, their positives elevated while criticisms of their
negatives spun as being "xenophobic", and as such are now widely adopted in much of Western Civilization and beyond. We already have the global
village thanks to mass communications, transit and trade. Nobody is really complaining about all that, yet for some reason the masses have been
convinced of this idea that this isn't good enough, and that we should go full bore towards a total global government.
This idea seems to be most hardy here in the US, and in the EU, despite the fact that at the federal levels in both governmental institutions, things
like accountability and these governments being in touch with the will of the people about as grand a lesson in railroading as can be imagined.
Therefore, the idea of adding yet more higher up layers above out working models is beyond comprehension, in my view. Add in the fact that once a
global government is established, with no more independent nations to oppose it, as it evolves into being a dark system of oppression (as governments
have a long historical tendency of doing), there would be o one left to oppose it. This reality is something you will never hear Globalists
Backing up, originators of the neocolonial global government push helped form the UN, and the UN has been the main fountainhead of 'global village
means world government' type rhetoric in recent decades. While the overall premise of the United Nations isn't so bad, and even needed, these
Globalists have been at the helm of it and essentially every world power for ages. The UN s it is is a plenty, although when you look at the types of
nation member roles it has in its various committees we can already see how flawed the world government model is. One choice example is how currently
Saudi Arabia is at the helm of the Human Rights Council. If you're not sure the contradiction there then I implore you to google |Saudi Arabia human
edit on 31-10-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)
Here in the US, 'both sides' of the "Two Party System" have been subservient to the elitist 'Powers That Be' for probably much longer than you've been
alive. The big mega-conglomerates that own 90% of all US media (TV (all the channels not just the news), radio, print and so on) number at only six.
Just 6 Globalist mega-conglomerates own essentially of the media you've been 'consuming' all of your life. The Internet has been a major game
changer for the little people of Earth, yet still in terms of political and pop culture the vast majority of material that people carry on
about is what flows from our loving Globalists propaganda outlets.
When you add it all up (which I've written extensively about its many facets), especially from our "American" viewpoint, this system in practice truly
is the embodiment of pure evil.
It's all based entirely on lies, half-truths, distortions and omissions of how the world really works, and how to interpret all of the most important
things in the "news". The lies run so deep that the "two" parties when you really get down to it are one in the same. They're both Globalist. They
both push for perpetual war. They both push for radicalizing Islamic Jihad. They both push for a never ending War on Drugs (heralded by the UN). The
CIA and other international intelligence agencies are the ultimate purveyors of the
intentional drug trade. 'Their' actions have been and continue to be the most diabolical imaginable int he above pursuits. Governments are
overthrown. Minds are molded via Social Engineering to be unwitting slaves; livestock. The atrocities due to it that are happening right this moment
are beyond words.
Sure, in lip service this all isn't always the case, but in practice it always seems to prove true, and we have decades of results to prove the point,
all right at our fingertips on the Internet.
They have nations at war with each other, which goes without saying. They have populations at war with themselves, which isn't really a new trend, but
it's modern manifestations in just the past few years have essentially every social group (in this most diverse and free nation in human history)
ready to tear each other to pieces.
Moving on, today the latest social trend is the equivalent to a sort of Social Imperialism, and is driven home across mainstream pop culture under the
auspices of otherwise well meaning "Multiculturalism". It is here that free thinkers can see the true darkness underlying the Globalists ambitions.
They have crafted this into this new ideology we call "Political Correctness", where they have set its followers in motion to 'naturally' undertake
rewriting more or less the entire English language in codifying the Nu Speak. All to drive wedges that tear us all apart identity wise, and to stomp
out individuality while enforcing new forms of censorship and thought control.
In terms of immigration, this push is bent on ramming our cultures together at an entirely unnatural pace while thought criminalizing attempts of
criticizing even the most barbarically oppressive customs on the planet. This part is where
the "PC" narrative completely falls apart, as Mainstream Global Islam is the worst
set of cultural barbarism in terms of human rights, in particular the very ones PC people supposedly most cherish. That part just goes without saying,
but where this all falls through the floor of the looney bin is how the Globalist politicians, academics and media (the fountainheads) have instilled
in PC people the highest priority in protecting, nurturing and coddling said customs of barbarism to the point where criticisms of it are increasingly
responded to with vicious outrage. If that doesn't paint a clear enough picture for you, then consider the proposed immigration policies being pushed
by the "Democrat" leadership, where just allowing those who make it here let isn't good enough, the policy now we are to go out of way (and pay) to
literally importold world Muslim's (from battle torn Syria) on the mass scale
(to the tune of 600,000 over the next 4 years), while turning rabid at proposals to use major vetting measures to keep out the ones who have no
interest in our multicultural Western Values. The narrative is pushed with this idea that we don't know that significant percentages of them
following wont end up causing US harm following such a policy, despite the fact we have the situation in the EU as a perfect case study of how this
kind of policy plays out. (For a detailed detailed look into this entire paragraph see here.) And
[yvid=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1137053/pg1]nevermind[/url] how more immigrants harm job opportunities for our poorest.
The Globalists 'values' tell us that all cultures are equal, despite the fact that 'everyone' 'has always' wanted to move here and be a part of ours,
at least the ones that favor Western Values. For perspective on this idea, consider the words of Dinesh D'Souza (an American immigrant from India):
"If one begins with the multicultural premise that all cultures are equal, then the world as it is makes very little sense", which Thomas Sowell
paraphrases his argument as "Some cultures have completely outperformed others in providing the things that all people seek: health, food, housing,
security and the amenities of life." I'll add to that list liberty, and multiculturalism itself.
As with most of the perspectives herein, the regular folks that most buy into the ideals of globalization etc always seem to show a complete ignorance
of the history these very same Globalists who are now the fountainheads of all this PC
stuff. The globalists have long gutted the wealth of other peoples via imperialistic "Neoliberal" economic policy agendas. Too often over the
past 50+ years, when such ends couldn't be achieved by political and corporatist means, then the intelligence agencies come swooping in and overthrow
democratically elected governments.
The parallel history, and continuing trend is the destruction of the lands of other peoples, given the long history of "Neoconservative" style
military interventions. They persist to this day, emanating from 'Globalist USA', by the very "Democrat" party that is solely responsible these days
for driving this 'overall' multicultural etc ideology. That is, the Obama/Clinton administration literally proves that both "Neoiberalism" and
"Neoconservatism" methods are completely interchangeable, and 'forever' the true face of both the "Republicans" and "Democrats".
This reality tends to go on overlooked by the regular folks of both sides, as each party always switches back and forth in lip service on their take
of either method, from one international ordeal to the next. Yet all one has to do is take a good hard look over the timeline spoken to here, and its
plain as day.
edit on 31-10-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)
While it is for now still great here (despite the decades long erosion of wealth and liberty), not everybody else inherently wants to come here nor do
they inherently care for our values. Yet thanks to the above Globalist examples of international policy methodology, historically many people have
ended up desperate to come here despite the ruthless things that happened to their homelands.
All of this being done in their push for open borders which will ensure perpetual "Social Group Warfare" (SGW), as I call all of this, amongst
evermore populations across the globe. That is what the talking heads on TV are really saying when they talk about "open borders". This same twisted
play on interpretation, this 'Elitese' language also goes for when they talk about things like "US Interests", or when they say "our freedom was
attacked" (Bush on 9/11) they are more likely talking about imperialism. What freedom means to the elites when they talk about it is that; not your
personal freedoms (which by the way are endlessly being eroded as a result of the very 'globalization' agendas that cause all of these ever increasing
problems). This 'Elitese' 'language' is not to be confused with PC language.
And despite what the "Two Party's" have said or say now about "open borders", ultimately they both maintain the general progression in that direction.
The parties are phonies. The "Republicans" are fake conservatives, while the "Democrat's" are fake liberals. And they've twisted the platforms in such
ways to divide and conquer. That's old news, the old way. Today it's taken the old divide & conquer saying to all news levels by pitting all the other
extra-partisan identity social groups against another in complex ways.
All of this serves to divert of course. If we're fighting each other then we cant possibly hope to rise together against them. To these ends they've
adopted this so called social justice ideology which has pitted essentially every minority group (included females) against the more dominant gender
of the majority race. Predictably, when assessing their doctrines, its leading to hate and major social conflict. This great most free and most
diverse nation was founded by predominately white people of the Christian faith, and yet such are now being demonized as the ultimate oppressors.
Demonized for the wrongs that these Globalist elitists are the ones responsible for.
They've branded said dominant gender of the majority racial group as the "Patriarchy", oddly enough. It posits that these straight white males are
responsible for all of the societal level wrongs of their oppressive policies that includes the economic warfare that has caused the poverty of the
minorities as well as an increasing bulk of this supposed "Patriarchy" group.
Yet there really is a "Patriarchy", except it is them, not us. Like the devil, it has many names.
What is, who are this "Patriarchy"? It's the Globalist elitist above the politicians & Two Party System, that own the national Media. They are the
robber baron captains of industry; the Bankster's; the Plutocrat Oligarch's. They are Ruling Establishment. They, this 'system' are known by many
names in this, which largely depend on the individual. More proper titles include the New World Order, The Powers That Be, the Global Power Elite, and
so on. Some even call them the "Illuminati", although that refers to any of these sorts whom are practitioners of dark "Ancient Mystery Religions"
(esoteric occultism). Their power structures and schemes of control include Electioneering, the world central banks, social engineering, Wall Street
special interests, the Military Industrial Complex, the Prison Industrial Complex and countless other wicked machinations of division & deceit.
I surmise every individual has some concept of it, even if only subconsciously.
These people aren't like most of you or I. Their social identity is that of power hungry sociopaths.
They don't care about you, your family or even your social identity groups they pretend to pedestal, except for how they can use those social
identities to manipulate you via state of the art mass scale social psychology techniques.
They Rule By Fear, and Smear. Their primary mechanism to these ends is their more or less global Criminal Media empire. The odds against them can
become in our favor thanks to the Internet in general, and now, WikiLeaks in particular. It's pretty much all fully exposed for all the world to see
if only will open your minds and take the time to look.
They mold our minds from cradle to grave via sophisticated mass scale social engineering techniques. They do it with politics, TV, radio, 'education'
and other various forms of indoctrination and related 'brain washing' forms of propaganda. Essentially, everything being spewed out across all
major media is propaganda. I can argue this fact for eternity.
Currently, Globalist Elites are the Real "Patriarchy", and Multiculturalism is their Scheme of Manipulation.
The total implications herein are beyond comprehension. There is 'truth' on TV but it's essentially all been distorted and/or key points omitted... at
every turn. It's been going on for so long that even the majority of the talking heads transmitting it are true believers. Naturally, as after all it
has 'always' been being incrementally implemented in baby steps for multiple overlapping generations.
Whatever you think you know, if you learned it from Them odds are it's heavily twisted from actual reality, if not false altogether. The warping of
reality via television is subtle, ubiquitous, pervasive and persistent.
The best way to see between their combined lies is in seeing their criticisms of each other. Usually such tend to be quite accurate, while where it
falls apart is their own self-assessments of the others criticisms. Too often, the same broad based criticisms of their rivals aren't much different
More specific tells come when you look at the POTUS (president) and how the media handles them. Generally speaking, if the POTUS is a Republican you
turn to CNN / NBC / ABC / CBS to get the dirt, while turning to FOX you'll get almost noting but denials usually only in response to the allegations
etc from the "other side". When the POTUS seat flips over to the Democrat's, now the ball of more-truths rolls back the other way where you have to
turn to FOX to have some semblance of hope of hearing what's really going on (well a lot of it anyways). There's still only so much news, and
more importantly only so many perspectives you will ever hear. The way it generally plays out with the bigger picture perspectives is, the more
important they are the less likely you are to ever see them on TV.
edit on 31-10-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)
Come election time, how you know who are the Globalist candidates and who are The People's candidates it by studying the theater for the ones that the
party's + media try to ram down our throats, versus the ones they try to ignore (and when that doesn't work they turn to Fear & Smear).
In 2008 it was Ron Paul as a "Republican" and Dennis Kucinich as a "Democrat" who were The People's champions. This case study was especially telling
as during the Primary's it was the GOP's & FOX's job to crush Ron Paul, while it was the job of the DNC & CNN / etc job to crush Dennis Kucinich. And
that they did. They squashed them, they squashed us the supporters and ultimately the American People, like bugs.
This election we had another parallel case study in the form of Bernie Sanders vs. Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump vs. over a dozen Globalist GOP
candidates. There was also Rand Paul, but he didn't last. In seeing Trump as the ultimate threat, the Criminal Media set its entire combined apparatus
against him rather early on. It quickly became obvious they wouldn't be able to ignore and shoo him like they managed to do with Ron Paul and the
gloves came off their desperate hands.
Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders crept up on Hillary's heels and nearly won. Hillary was the out and open pure Globalist who was supposed to be the
shoe in. The DNC didn't even bother stacking the usual norm of about 10 candidates to debate and all that, which was unprecedented. But Bernie stepped
up to spite them and caused havoc. This sent to Globalists and Hillary's campaign into total panic mode.
So in response, they pulled out another totally unprecedented playbook where they deployed
organized Paid Riot Squads to the Trump rallies that led to countless atrocities. Perhaps the sickest part of all is then the Criminal Media
spun all of the assaults and riots as being Trump's fault, where it was Bernie's supporters doing the crimes. Two outsiders nearly obliterated with
one central organized Paid Riot Squad operation.
We have all the pieces now to see the full picture of this. It's as blatant as it has all been brazen.
So there it is. The "Patriarchy" is real, but it's not who 'they' told us it is. Instead it's them and they've proven they'll stop at nothing maintain
their global democracy and spirit agenda. It's so far gone now it's beyond words. Bt we still have a chance. It's likely the final one.
I know half of the people out there don't want to hear it, but, this chance which is quite likely our last is Donald J. Trump. Who knows, he could
prove to be a phoney like Obama has proven to be. (That's what I expected most of his run, until I started paying close attention to the the "Two
Party's" and the Criminal Media were handling things.) We'll all need to carefully watch for this, but we also have the issue of how people tend to
get too emotionally invested in their party / candidate by the time the dust settles. Therefore, in regards of all of the above, we need scores of
people truly watching him that can honestly argue that they voted for him and have 'a right' to criticize in terms of this kind of greater good all
They Rule By Fear, and Smear. Their primary mechanism to these ends is their more or less global Criminal Media empire.
Project Fear/Project Smear
The political/business/media/academic elites that targeted the Brexit vote for defeat with “Project Fear” are the same combined forces that have
targeted Donald Trump with Project Smear. Following the Brexit victory, an obviously chastened Richard Haass, president of the world
government-promoting, pro-EU, pro-open borders Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), commented: "For Hillary Clinton's campaign, this is something of a
warning not to underestimate this disaffection, not to underestimate political and economic nationalism."
Hillary Clinton, who, while secretary of state, famously said (in the presence of her “good friend” Richard Haass) that she depended upon the CFR
to tell her what to do and what to think (see video of her confession here), is obviously listening to the advice of Haass. She has flip-flopped on
TPP and has sort of flip-flopped on migration-refugees. She is trying to appeal to all sides; appealing for the Hispanic/immigrant vote by supporting
“comprehensive immigration reform” — the longtime code phrase for amnesty and open borders — while at the same time attempting to appeal to
Middle America by insisting she intends to implement stringent vetting of refugees/immigrants. The open question is how many American voters will
believe her new “public position” on open borders — and how many will believe — or be influenced by/distracted by — Project Smear.
dit on 1-11-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)
Great thread, and remember the applause I just gave in light of the rest of this post .
Does calling it the patriarchy sort of white wash all the very numerous and powerful women who have been complicit in these organizations and who have
had a direct impact on the success of these groups?
Say for example, the Windsors or the powerful women of the Rothschild family who worked via proxy?
I certainly agree with absolutely everything else, I just find the terminology used not aproppos.
In approximately 48 hr the course of human history will be decided.
There are two camps, those that choose to defend the Constitution of the United States of America.
And those that choose to destroy it.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.