It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

How on Earth are you people still defending her?

page: 43
158
<< 40  41  42    44 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 10:00 AM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

From the initial investigation to this last re-opening...you have a gift for prophesying the precise opposite of reality.


originally posted by: [post=21453492]RickinVa
99.9% chance. Just 3 or 4 emails out of 650,000 could spell doom.





posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 10:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: RickinVa

From the initial investigation to this last re-opening...you have a gift for prophesying the precise opposite of reality.


originally posted by: [post=21453492]RickinVa
99.9% chance. Just 3 or 4 emails out of 650,000 could spell doom.





You do know that those 650,000 emails are now subject to FOIA requests. Since it is not an active investigation, they should start releasing them shortly.

They will come out eventually. Probably enough in there for impeachment.
edit on R112016-11-07T10:11:12-06:00k1111Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 10:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: RickinVa

From the initial investigation to this last re-opening...you have a gift for prophesying the precise opposite of reality.


originally posted by: [post=21453492]RickinVa
99.9% chance. Just 3 or 4 emails out of 650,000 could spell doom.





You do know that those 650,000 emails are now subject to FOIA requests. Since it is not an active investigation, they should start releasing them shortly.

They will come out eventually. Probably enough in there for impeachment.


ummm...No. Evidence in an ongoing investigation into Weiner is not subject to FOIA...nor are the personal emails of Huma or HRC...and apart from personal emails, the rest were duplicates of what has already been released.

So...hate to say it, but your year-long "wrong" streak is holding steady.
edit on 7-11-2016 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 10:19 AM
link   
originally posted by: Indigo5


You do know that those 650,000 emails are now subject to FOIA requests. Since it is not an active investigation, they should start releasing them shortly.

They will come out eventually. Probably enough in there for impeachment.

Any information gathered during an FBI investigation is subject to FOIA. The FBI can only refuse to release information due to an ongoing investigation.

Anything on that laptop will be subject to FOIA.

Judicial Watch most likely has already sent the FOIA request to the FBI for any information concerning Clinton and Huma recovered from that laptop.
edit on R222016-11-07T10:22:59-06:00k2211Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)

edit on R242016-11-07T10:24:11-06:00k2411Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 10:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: RickinVa
Like I said... all it takes is less than 65 out of 650,000 emails that are classified or work related that not have been turned over and the political fallout will finish Hillary. That is 1% of 1%. Pretty damn good percentages.

It is not rocket science. No time to feed the trolls.


Rocket science eh?

Looks like those damn good percentages didn't help you out there.


LOL!

Good luck with that re: getting an actual honest and truthful answer.



Out of the 41 Pages of Response's in this Thread , your Contribution so far has been Over 20 Sarcastic , Borderline Insulting ones Pretty Much not having Anything to do with the OP's Topic of Defending Hillary Clinton's Behavior of Consistent Untruths , and the Logic Behind People Supporting a Person with a Dubious Character such as that . So I have to ask you , what do you have to Offer here in Explaining how a Woman with such a Documented History of Telling Untruths can be a Person who Anyone would Consider as a Viable Candidate for the Highest Office in our Country ? I am All Ears Professer ....



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 10:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs


Every time I hear this song now, I think of "that scene" in Quentin Tarantino's "Reservoir Dogs".

Talk about getting an image seared into your brain...



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 10:35 AM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

Republicans would do better to show they still want a united people. They have been off on their own doing witch hunts and side conspiracies for a long time now.

The secret illegitimate gay communist Muslim President thing got really f-ing stupid and now they're setting up for 8 more years of total conspiracy failure again. Please don't.

I miss the non-extremist Republicans.



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 11:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: Indigo5


You do know that those 650,000 emails are now subject to FOIA requests. Since it is not an active investigation, they should start releasing them shortly.



Wow...How bizarre that you claim to have worked for the FBI.

No..Her personal emails reviewed were found not to be relevant evidence to the investigation and thus are not subject to FOIA or other release.

Apart from the Privacy Act....FOIA prohibits this kind of release...



Exemption (7)(C) recognizes that individuals have a privacy interest in information maintained in law enforcement files. It is the law enforcement counterpart to Exemption 6, providing protection for law enforcement information the disclosure of which "could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy."

If the disclosure of information could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the information is exempt from disclosure.

www.foiadvocates.com...

What a bizarre claim you are clinging to.



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 11:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: Indigo5


You do know that those 650,000 emails are now subject to FOIA requests. Since it is not an active investigation, they should start releasing them shortly.



Wow...How bizarre that you claim to have worked for the FBI.

No..Her personal emails reviewed were found not to be relevant evidence to the investigation and thus are not subject to FOIA or other release.

Apart from the Privacy Act....FOIA prohibits this kind of release...



Exemption (7)(C) recognizes that individuals have a privacy interest in information maintained in law enforcement files. It is the law enforcement counterpart to Exemption 6, providing protection for law enforcement information the disclosure of which "could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy."

If the disclosure of information could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the information is exempt from disclosure.

www.foiadvocates.com...

What a bizarre claim you are clinging to.


What a bizarre claim you have my friend...

So you are claiming that all 650,000 emails were wedding plans, yoga lessons, and other assorted sundries that are all personal and not subject to FOIA?

You guys said the same thing about the last 30,000 emails and the recently recovered emails in the FBI investigation but that didn't work out for you very well... sure you want to believe in that fantasy again?
edit on R232016-11-07T11:23:01-06:00k2311Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)

edit on R232016-11-07T11:23:56-06:00k2311Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 11:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: Indigo5


You do know that those 650,000 emails are now subject to FOIA requests. Since it is not an active investigation, they should start releasing them shortly.



Wow...How bizarre that you claim to have worked for the FBI.

No..Her personal emails reviewed were found not to be relevant evidence to the investigation and thus are not subject to FOIA or other release.

Apart from the Privacy Act....FOIA prohibits this kind of release...



Exemption (7)(C) recognizes that individuals have a privacy interest in information maintained in law enforcement files. It is the law enforcement counterpart to Exemption 6, providing protection for law enforcement information the disclosure of which "could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy."

If the disclosure of information could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the information is exempt from disclosure.

www.foiadvocates.com...

What a bizarre claim you are clinging to.



So you are claiming that all 650,000 emails were wedding plans, yoga lessons, and other assorted sundries that are all personal and not subject to FOIA?


One part duplicates...one part personal emails...

I am not saying it...the FBI did.



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 11:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: Indigo5


You do know that those 650,000 emails are now subject to FOIA requests. Since it is not an active investigation, they should start releasing them shortly.



Wow...How bizarre that you claim to have worked for the FBI.

No..Her personal emails reviewed were found not to be relevant evidence to the investigation and thus are not subject to FOIA or other release.

Apart from the Privacy Act....FOIA prohibits this kind of release...



Exemption (7)(C) recognizes that individuals have a privacy interest in information maintained in law enforcement files. It is the law enforcement counterpart to Exemption 6, providing protection for law enforcement information the disclosure of which "could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy."

If the disclosure of information could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the information is exempt from disclosure.

www.foiadvocates.com...

What a bizarre claim you are clinging to.



So you are claiming that all 650,000 emails were wedding plans, yoga lessons, and other assorted sundries that are all personal and not subject to FOIA?


One part duplicates...one part personal emails...

I am not saying it...the FBI did.


Oh I see ..you trust the FBI again.... I do not and I do not believe for one single second that all 650,000 emails were simply repeats.

I retired from the FBI and I do not trust Comey at all. ZERO trust.

You were all over Comey until he became your hero again on Sunday.


Status Quo.



edit on R272016-11-07T11:27:34-06:00k2711Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 12:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: Indigo5


You do know that those 650,000 emails are now subject to FOIA requests. Since it is not an active investigation, they should start releasing them shortly.



Wow...How bizarre that you claim to have worked for the FBI.

No..Her personal emails reviewed were found not to be relevant evidence to the investigation and thus are not subject to FOIA or other release.

Apart from the Privacy Act....FOIA prohibits this kind of release...



Exemption (7)(C) recognizes that individuals have a privacy interest in information maintained in law enforcement files. It is the law enforcement counterpart to Exemption 6, providing protection for law enforcement information the disclosure of which "could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy."

If the disclosure of information could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the information is exempt from disclosure.

www.foiadvocates.com...

What a bizarre claim you are clinging to.



So you are claiming that all 650,000 emails were wedding plans, yoga lessons, and other assorted sundries that are all personal and not subject to FOIA?


One part duplicates...one part personal emails...

I am not saying it...the FBI did.


Oh I see ..you trust the FBI again.... I do not and I do not believe for one single second that all 650,000 emails were simply repeats.

I retired from the FBI and I do not trust Comey at all. ZERO trust.

You were all over Comey until he became your hero again on Sunday.


Status Quo.




Oh...I still think Comey has let political bias leak into his job. He is neither a Villian nor Hero. He should resign though.

Either way...from a reality/practical standpoint...the FBI has issued a conclusion that the emails were either unrelated and private or duplicates of emails they already reviewed from Huma.

So FOIA exemption 7(c) as I linked to above will prohibit the release in the future of those emails.

"Exemption (7)(C) recognizes that individuals have a privacy interest in information maintained in law enforcement files.

..

If the disclosure of information could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the information is exempt from disclosure."



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 02:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: Indigo5


You do know that those 650,000 emails are now subject to FOIA requests. Since it is not an active investigation, they should start releasing them shortly.



Wow...How bizarre that you claim to have worked for the FBI.

No..Her personal emails reviewed were found not to be relevant evidence to the investigation and thus are not subject to FOIA or other release.

Apart from the Privacy Act....FOIA prohibits this kind of release...



Exemption (7)(C) recognizes that individuals have a privacy interest in information maintained in law enforcement files. It is the law enforcement counterpart to Exemption 6, providing protection for law enforcement information the disclosure of which "could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy."

If the disclosure of information could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the information is exempt from disclosure.

www.foiadvocates.com...

What a bizarre claim you are clinging to.



So you are claiming that all 650,000 emails were wedding plans, yoga lessons, and other assorted sundries that are all personal and not subject to FOIA?


One part duplicates...one part personal emails...

I am not saying it...the FBI did.


Oh I see ..you trust the FBI again.... I do not and I do not believe for one single second that all 650,000 emails were simply repeats.

I retired from the FBI and I do not trust Comey at all. ZERO trust.

You were all over Comey until he became your hero again on Sunday.


Status Quo.




Oh...I still think Comey has let political bias leak into his job. He is neither a Villian nor Hero. He should resign though.

Either way...from a reality/practical standpoint...the FBI has issued a conclusion that the emails were either unrelated and private or duplicates of emails they already reviewed from Huma.

So FOIA exemption 7(c) as I linked to above will prohibit the release in the future of those emails.

"Exemption (7)(C) recognizes that individuals have a privacy interest in information maintained in law enforcement files.

..

If the disclosure of information could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the information is exempt from disclosure."


So you continue to cling to that faint faint hope that none of the 650,000 emails were not work related or classified and all purely 100% personal which exempts them from FOIA requests. They have already shown that there were many emails... supposedly duplicates. Bet there are more.

Right... so you are perfectly ok with the way the emails were searched, for specific phrases and words.

You do know that is EXACTLY how Clinton sorted through her emails before turning them over and we all know how that worked out. Hillary Clinton turned over every work email and classified email to the State Department because they went through those emails and searched them by key words and phrases.

Yes sir, that method of screening emails worked out perfectly for Hillary... she didn't miss a single one did she?



edit on R112016-11-07T14:11:07-06:00k1111Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 02:44 PM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

I'm 99.9% sure that you've already lost this point.
Keep clinging to those straws man, your prediction made you look a fool.

Retired FBI agent doesn't know the difference between percentage and probability... haha give me a break.



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 03:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: SudoNim
a reply to: RickinVa

I'm 99.9% sure that you've already lost this point.
Keep clinging to those straws man, your prediction made you look a fool.

Retired FBI agent doesn't know the difference between percentage and probability... haha give me a break.


For the last time.. I have repeatedly told you I am NOT a retired FBI agent. That would be a felony for me to come on ATS to pretend that I was.

Why can't you understand that 60% of FBI employees are not agents?

If it helps you out at all, I was a 0391 Telecommunications Specialist my entire federal career, retired as a GS13/8 with a stint in the middle as a 2210 Information Technology Specialist.

You can easily find the scope of required knowledge, skills and abilities required for those position by googling them.
edit on R542016-11-07T15:54:30-06:00k5411Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 03:50 PM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

You have posted that you are retired from the FBI. If you weren't an agent, what were you? A receptionist? A forensic accountant? A code specialist?

Inquiring minds want to know.



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 03:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Riffrafter

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: RickinVa
Like I said... all it takes is less than 65 out of 650,000 emails that are classified or work related that not have been turned over and the political fallout will finish Hillary. That is 1% of 1%. Pretty damn good percentages.

It is not rocket science. No time to feed the trolls.


Rocket science eh?

Looks like those damn good percentages didn't help you out there.


LOL!

Good luck with that re: getting an actual honest and truthful answer.



Out of the 41 Pages of Response's in this Thread , your Contribution so far has been Over 20 Sarcastic , Borderline Insulting ones Pretty Much not having Anything to do with the OP's Topic of Defending Hillary Clinton's Behavior of Consistent Untruths , and the Logic Behind People Supporting a Person with a Dubious Character such as that . So I have to ask you , what do you have to Offer here in Explaining how a Woman with such a Documented History of Telling Untruths can be a Person who Anyone would Consider as a Viable Candidate for the Highest Office in our Country ? I am All Ears Professer ....










LOL!

Good luck with that re: getting an actual honest and truthful answer.





Being Called " Buddy " by a Cartoon Character with Suspect " Brain Cells " , and Not Answering my Question Directly is Not Exactly what I had in Mind . You Called it !
edit on 7-11-2016 by Zanti Misfit because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 03:56 PM
link   
a reply to: windword

"You have posted that you are retired from the FBI. If you weren't an agent, what were you? A receptionist? A forensic accountant? A code specialist?

Inquiring minds want to know."


I retired as a GS13 GS 0391 Telecommunications Specialist


Similarly, telecommunications specialists use knowledge of data processing equipment and communications related applications programs. The knowledge of automation/ADP equipment and processes applied by telecommunications specialists involves a practical understanding of automation concepts and communications interfaces and compatibilities for receiving, storing, processing, and/or transmitting of digital information within a system . This limited practical automation interface and compatibility knowledge is secondary to the primary knowledge requirement for communications theories, principles, concepts, and practices and does not involve or require specific or indepth knowledge of how computers work internally and/or how program s are developed. They define operating criteria, monitor installation, and perform testing to determine the quality and efficiency of automated equipment and software. They critique such performance so that computer specialists (Federal or vendor) may make corrections or adjustments in software or operating system s to provide the kinds and levels of service specified in telecommunications system requirements



I also did a few years in the middle of my career as a GS 2210 Information Technology Specialist, specifically as Systems Administrator in a supervisory capacity.


For GS-12 and above: Experience that demonstrated accomplishment of computer project assignments that required a wide range of knowledge of computer requirements and techniques pertinent to the position to be filled. This knowledge is generally demonstrated by assignments where the applicant analyzed a number of alternative approaches in the process of advising management concerning major aspects of ADP system design, such as what system interrelationships must be considered, or what operating mode, system software, and/or equipment configuration is most appropriate for a given project.


There ya go......yep I was a janitor alright.



edit on R382016-11-07T16:38:26-06:00k3811Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 03:58 PM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

YEAH but THAT was when we got CAUGHT so it REALLY wasn't part....oh yeah,I can run a buffer.



posted on Nov, 7 2016 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

Thanks!




There ya go......yep I was a janitor alright.


Did you use BitBleach?



new topics

top topics



 
158
<< 40  41  42    44 >>

log in

join