It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
originally posted by: whyamIhere
Here's the the truth...
You could only defend a person like her for one reason.
You are somehow benefitting financially.
Negative, you could just care about humanity and see which one cares more...
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: angeldoll
That's a civil case, not a criminal case.
Anyone can sue in a civil case. It does not mean it is justified.
People particularly tend to start frivolous civil suits against the rich or famous.
originally posted by: angeldoll
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: angeldoll
one quick question for you.
Is it legal to have classified government documents on an unsecured computer in your home if you worked for the government in a high security position?
Keep in mind, this is a YES or NO question, there is no room for ambiguity or wiggle, it's black and white.
I know you won't answer as it blows your point like Lewinsky. (pun intended for the blow part)
Prove she had documents at the time that were classified. The FBI couldn't do, Congress couldn't do it, but if you can, let's see the sources.
From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
originally posted by: proximo
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Can anyone answer me this.
When was the last time, a non-politician ran for president?
Ross Perot. I think he would have been a very good president. We definitely would not have gotten NAFTA with him.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: Ophiuchus 13
NOPE never did ,I don't SEE WHY all OLDER civilizations should take their orders from the NEW kid .
WE never TRY to be what we are WE just DO it and the rest followed,THEN me got stuck with he JOB when the world got TOO cheap to police itself ....partially because the oligarchs wished it so.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
If you could promise me that Trump won't put an uber conservative on the Supreme Court, and if you could promise me he won't try to build a stupid wall, and if you could promise me that he won't ban all Muslims from coming to this country, and if you could promise me that he won't put a muzzle on the press to keep them from saying anything uncomplimentary about him, if you could promise me that he wouldn't promote more tax loopholes for the very rich, if you could promise me he won't help to enact a stop and frisk procedure in African American and Hispanic communities...
If you could promise me all that, I might vote for him. I know Hillary won't do any of those things, so that's why I'm likely to vote for her.