It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Hillary sent 'marked classified' info to nonsecure Abedin email account

page: 6
18
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 02:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Lol our spooks line up secure comms all the time, and in the worst of situations.


No they don't. To transmit classified data you're supposed to use the US's secure communication system which requires a satellite uplink and a direct wired connection to the transmitter. It's not very practical for sending/receiving emails on the go.




posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 02:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan

so you get the gear spec for the job which you have to ask for

or you do jack squat like she did, which incidentally is illegal


lol direct wired connection to the transmitter
you watch to many transformer movies

our spooks can handle the job no problem



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 02:49 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

The reason some aren't classified is because Obama never appointed an inspector general to SOS, they have to be physically marked with a header but how could they if no one ever sees them and they're all in Hillarys basement

And remember she signed a sf312 which sais classified material is classified whether it has a header or not.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 02:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
lol direct wired connection to the transmitter
you watch to many transformer movies


All wireless connections are insecure. Even if the data sent over it is encrypted, the encrypted information can still be recorded and decryption can be attempted later. That's why you need to use a wired connection for something to be secure.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 02:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan




This is the phone NSA suggested Clinton use: A $4,750 Windows CE PDA SME PED devices were only NSA-approved mobile phones for classified communications.

arstechnica.com...



When former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was pushing to get a waiver allowing her to use a BlackBerry like President Barack Obama back in 2009, the National Security Agency had a very short list of devices approved for classified communications. It was two devices built for the Secure Mobile Environment Portable Electronic Device (SME PED) program. In fact, those devices were the only thing anyone in government without an explicit security waiver (like the one the president got, along with his souped-up BlackBerry 8830) could use until as recently as last year to get mobile access to top secret encrypted calls and secure e-mail.


Answers are available
you just need look
or if you are SOS ask



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 03:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: ssenerawa
a reply to: introvert

The reason some aren't classified is because Obama never appointed an inspector general to SOS, they have to be physically marked with a header but how could they if no one ever sees them and they're all in Hillarys basement

And remember she signed a sf312 which sais classified material is classified whether it has a header or not.


That has nothing to do with this case. The emails came from a CF employee and it was not created by/for or controlled by the US government.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 03:23 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Hillary is guilty as day, they just need to find intention somewhere in these 650,000 emails.
edit on 31-10-2016 by ssenerawa because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 03:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Answers are available
you just need look
or if you are SOS ask


Was she using that device? I was under the impression she was using a special Blackberry like Obama did, which was something they weren't able to secure.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 04:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: ssenerawa
a reply to: introvert

The reason some aren't classified is because Obama never appointed an inspector general to SOS, they have to be physically marked with a header but how could they if no one ever sees them and they're all in Hillarys basement

And remember she signed a sf312 which sais classified material is classified whether it has a header or not.


That has nothing to do with this case. The emails came from a CF employee and it was not created by/for or controlled by the US government.


You keep conveniently leaving out the most pertinent fact here.

After the email was sent by Blumenthal, HRC then *forwarded* that email to Huma Abedin's non-secure yahoo account.

Those pesky facts, I know...

Better get used to those pesky facts though, as they - and only they - will determine the outcome here.

Your wishes do not and your belief of those facts is not required.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 05:25 PM
link   
She forwarded it to a yahoo email?

We all know how secure yahoo is...

money.cnn.com...



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 05:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Riffrafter



After the email was sent by Blumenthal, HRC then *forwarded* that email to Huma Abedin's non-secure yahoo account.


If it is not classified government material, she can forward them to whomever she wants.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 05:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Riffrafter



After the email was sent by Blumenthal, HRC then *forwarded* that email to Huma Abedin's non-secure yahoo account.


If it is not classified government material, she can forward them to whomever she wants.


But as Secretary of State - and a classifying authority in her own right - she knew (or clearly should have known) that the info should have been classified. Not to mention the existence of the server itself is a crime from which said email was sent.

How much more do you need before you take your head out of the sand? Seriously...

Bottom line, she's either a criminal or criminally incompetent.

Those pesky, pesky facts...



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 08:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Riffrafter

Why should it have been classified? Just because it's classified now, doesn't mean a reason existed to classify it then.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 09:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: Riffrafter

Why should it have been classified? Just because it's classified now, doesn't mean a reason existed to classify it then.


Did you read the email?

It's plain as day.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 09:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Riffrafter

I did. I don't see the issue.



posted on Nov, 1 2016 @ 01:52 AM
link   
a reply to: DeathSlayer

That is not a smoking gun by any means.

That CONFIDENTIAL marking, although very similar to an official government classification marking doesn't mean squat coming from Blumenthal.

This is nothing. And I can't stand Hillary.

You are confusing two things.... one is that great big "CONFIDENTIAL" in the middle of the page means nothing. That was put there by Blumenthal.

The fact that the email was later classified "CONFIDENTIAL" by the reviewing person does not always mean that the information was classified when originated. According to Comey, some emails were "up-classified", which apparently means they were not classified at the time of transmission but were deemed classified at the time of review. This is not the same thing as "retroactively classified" which was previously claimed for the last year by some Hillary defenders. The FBI also noted that a significant number of the emails were deemed to be classified when sent and received, including some from Hillary herself.

Hope that makes sense.

Your example isn't proof unless you know which exact emails where deemed classified when sent and which ones were "up-classified". As far as I know, there is no way to distinguish that.

There is more if you look into the Intelligence Community complaining that Blumenthal copied some of their classified briefings word for word and sent them to Hillary. Nothing ever came of that. Too much immunity passed out like candy.

edit on R122016-11-01T02:12:48-05:00k1211Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 1 2016 @ 02:06 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert
(a) Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense; or
(b) Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense; or
(c) Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or
(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(g) If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.
(h)
(1) Any person convicted of a violation of this section shall forfeit to the United States, irrespective of any provision of State law, any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds the person obtained, directly or indirectly, from any foreign government, or any faction or party or military or naval force within a foreign country, whether recognized or unrecognized by the United States, as the result of such violation. For the purposes of this subsection, the term “State” includes a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.
(2) The court, in imposing sentence on a defendant for a conviction of a violation of this section, shall order that the defendant forfeit to the United States all property described in paragraph (1) of this subsection.
(3) The provisions of subsections (b), (c), and (e) through (p) of section 413 of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 853(b), (c), and (e)–(p)) shall apply to—
(A) property subject to forfeiture under this subsection;
(B) any seizure or disposition of such property; and
(C) any administrative or judicial proceeding in relation to such property,
if not inconsistent with this subsection.
(4) Notwithstanding section 524(c) of title 28, there shall be deposited in the Crime Victims Fund in the Treasury all amounts from the forfeiture of property under this subsection remaining after the payment of expenses for forfeiture and sale authorized by law.



posted on Nov, 1 2016 @ 02:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: ssenerawa
a reply to: introvert

The reason some aren't classified is because Obama never appointed an inspector general to SOS, they have to be physically marked with a header but how could they if no one ever sees them and they're all in Hillarys basement

And remember she signed a sf312 which sais classified material is classified whether it has a header or not.


That has nothing to do with this case. The emails came from a CF employee and it was not created by/for or controlled by the US government.


That is total BS. The email has been clearly marked classified by the US government. You're blowing smoke. Again.

Just bring up the old thread.. no need to rehash this again... and prove you dead wrong,,, again.

Or are you going back out into fantasy land where you imagine that Hillary sends emails from 7am-5pm as Secretary of State but sends classified data as a Clinton Foundation employee from 5pm-9pm and the information she sends or receives can not possibly be classified because it is not produced for or by the government during the 7am-5pm time frame but rather in the fantasy 5-9pm where she is not Secretary of State? Do you not understand that Hillary Clinton was an official representative of the US Government?

Once classified information came into possession of Hillary who was acting Secretary of State, it was US property. In any circumstance. From the day she took the oath until the day her term was up, anything and I mean ANYTHING that she did, said, wrote, typed, emailed, whatever that was classified was property of the US Government during that time frame 24/7/365.
edit on R292016-11-01T02:29:36-05:00k2911Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 1 2016 @ 08:44 AM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa



That is total BS. The email has been clearly marked classified by the US government. You're blowing smoke. Again.


It wasn't marked classified by the US government until 4 years after it was sent.



Or are you going back out into fantasy land where you imagine that Hillary sends emails from 7am-5pm as Secretary of State but sends classified data as a Clinton Foundation employee from 5pm-9pm and the information she sends or receives can not possibly be classified because it is not produced for or by the government during the 7am-5pm time frame but rather in the fantasy 5-9pm where she is not Secretary of State?


What the hell are you talking about? I've never said any such thing.



Do you not understand that Hillary Clinton was an official representative of the US Government?


Yes, but that alone does not mean the email should have been classified. It was not created by/for or controlled by the US government.



Once classified information came into possession of Hillary who was acting Secretary of State, it was US property. In any circumstance. From the day she took the oath until the day her term was up, anything and I mean ANYTHING that she did, said, wrote, typed, emailed, whatever that was classified was property of the US Government during that time frame 24/7/365.


That is true. In this case, it was not classified government material.
edit on 1-11-2016 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 1 2016 @ 10:20 AM
link   
Nevermind.

The end of Hillary is very near now and this will all soon be history.


Just not worth wasting my time.

Inauguration Day is still a long ways off.
edit on R272016-11-01T10:27:34-05:00k2711Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)

edit on R282016-11-01T10:28:41-05:00k2811Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join