It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Hillary sent 'marked classified' info to nonsecure Abedin email account

page: 2
18
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 08:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: greyhat

Confidential doesn't always mean the same thing as classified.






posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 09:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan
a federal judge made Hillary Clinton answer 25 questions for Judicial Watch. She could only recall the answer to 22 of them. was given a grade of f - on that test



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 09:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Aazadan
a federal judge made Hillary Clinton answer 25 questions for Judicial Watch. She could only recall the answer to 22 of them. was given a grade of f - on that test


I like that Judicial Watch hassles people, civilian oversight is a requirement for our government to function. All I'm saying, is that you can't trust them as a source. They're very biased. Let them stick to what they do well which is suing the government, their media side only exists to fund raise by getting people pissed off.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 09:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: DeathSlayer

You guys don't want the truth.

You want something to hang her with.

You're not getting it with this.


True

Whatever the truth is --- I won't live my life in the negative attitude of a lynch mob.

Hate to have you go it alone, but this negative energy is not for me.

See you in a week or so -- maybe.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 09:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

How would "the news" know? How does anyone but the FBI know what's in those emails. Weiner & Co. probably don't remember what's in them. Does the news know because that's what the HRC told them? Do you "know" a convicted criminal is innocent because they tell you they didn't do it?



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 09:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Wow
word of hillarys coronation apparently was exaggerated
will you return upon word of her demise?



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 09:48 AM
link   
a reply to: stosh64

World News Daily is the banned one. Not World Net Daily.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 09:53 AM
link   
a reply to: DeathSlayer

i posted this in the mega thread, maybe your title should read sent from.




something else i've been thinking about the past day. anyone remember dick morris saying hillary can't type. now i would think he would know seeing how long he was part of the clinton camp. and if that is the case, and there are 650,000 emails on huma's laptop could she have been typing them up for hillary. that would explain why so many. dick even says to look at for people typing for her at the end of the piece. here is his piece he wrote.


Don’t expect a gold mine of emails on Hillary’s private account. Why not? Because she doesn’t know how to type. That’s right. She writes everything out in longhand. Really. Anyone who has spent time in meetings with her knows about her endless yellow pads.
Hillary Can’t Type: Look To Huma’s and Cheryl’s Emails


www.abovetopsecret.com... t&fid=175&tid=1143753&pid=21448437



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:05 AM
link   
a reply to: hounddoghowlie

Lots of people who work with computers day in and day out can't type very fast. It's actually pretty rare for someone to have dictation level typing speed.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: greyhat

originally posted by: windword

The email in your link was marked "Classified" 4 years after it was sent.



Looks for me as if it was classified on July 15, 2009.



I can't stand her, but that says confidential.

So can someone please point out where it is labeled classified or what level of classification?



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

It's not classified. Corporations, charities and many other groups use headers like that in their correspondence. If it was a classified government document, it would of had specific markings.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:20 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert

I know, I just was hoping to jumpstart their brains.


Until now I had thought Judicial watch was upright, but with them making a false claim with this I see they are part of a propaganda machine. How sad.
edit on 31-10-2016 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grimpachi

It's not classified. Corporations, charities and many other groups use headers like that in their correspondence. If it was a classified government document, it would of had specific markings.

It is classified.
The declassification date is July 15, 2024.

Link to the pdf.
^^ Click it.^^
edit on b000000312016-10-31T10:27:00-05:0010America/ChicagoMon, 31 Oct 2016 10:27:00 -05001000000016 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grimpachi

It's not classified. Corporations, charities and many other groups use headers like that in their correspondence. If it was a classified government document, it would of had specific markings.

It is classified.
The declassification date is July 15, 2024.


It was not classified at the time and did not contain a government classification marking.

It was later classified and will be declassified based on the date of it's origination, not when it was classified.

Edit: Your PDF shows when it was classified. "10/30/3015". I assume that is a typo, and they meant 2015. Regardless, it was classified only after it came in to the governments hands. It was not classified to begin with because it was not government property.
edit on 31-10-2016 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:29 AM
link   
Why was it marked confidential in the original email?
Do you know why they go back to the date of origination and not the date that it went through the classification procedure?



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
Why was it marked confidential in the original email?
Do you know why they go back to the date of origination and not the date that it went through the classification procedure?


Probably because it contained information that was only meant to be shared with certain people with an organization.

The email most likely contained info on Clinton Foundation intelligence, etc.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:40 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Confidential is the lowest type of security clearance which doesn't mean much. For example I have some weapons manuals that are marked as confidential even manuals for PMCS on military vehicles are marked confidential. I don't think it breaks any laws or endangers national security to send them standard e-mail.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grimpachi

It's not classified. Corporations, charities and many other groups use headers like that in their correspondence. If it was a classified government document, it would of had specific markings.


It is *absolutely* classified.

The fact that is was classified later just shows that she did send classified information - knowingly or not.

And intent is not required. Gross negligence is all you need for a criminal conviction and to say that the SECRETARY of STATE doesn't know the difference between classified and non-classified info is a helluva indictment regarding her level of intelligence, competence and judgement.

And people want this person as POTUS?!

And remember she wouldn't be here if she hadn't *first* used a personal server for email - which is in itself a crime! She did this all to herself and yet some people are blaming others. Are you kidding me? It's ludicrous...

People would have to be blind or willfully ignorant to ignore all of these facts and still vote for her anyway.

On a final note I'm not too thrilled with the other choice either. If HRC steps down now I believe the DNC has to name Bernie Sanders as the candidate according to their own rules. Now that's a choice I will happily make. Anything's possible in this nutty election cycle...

That's my $0.02....

edit on 10/31/2016 by Riffrafter because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: butcherguy
Why was it marked confidential in the original email?
Do you know why they go back to the date of origination and not the date that it went through the classification procedure?


Probably because it contained information that was only meant to be shared with certain people with an organization.

The email most likely contained info on Clinton Foundation intelligence, etc.


So they just plopped a 'Confidential' marking on it just because they didn't want anyone else reading it.

If they didn't want anyone else reading it, maybe the first thing they should have done is try sending it on a state.gov email, instead of a yahoo email account of Huma's.

But really, we have to go through it all over again? How the email suddenly became classified after someone that was actually responsible found out that the information was out there without markings, you know, after the emails were turned over by Hillary.....
But wasn't classified when it originated?

I say again because this subject has been covered before on different threads.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 10:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: introvert

Confidential is the lowest type of security clearance which doesn't mean much. For example I have some weapons manuals that are marked as confidential even manuals for PMCS on military vehicles are marked confidential. I don't think it breaks any laws or endangers national security to send them standard e-mail.


True, but the 'confidential' marking is used by organizations and groups outside of the government, like the CF.



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join