"Investigators found 650,000 emails on a laptop that they believe was used by former Rep. Anthony Weiner .. the metadata showed many messages,
apparently in the thousands, that were either sent to or from the private email server at Mrs. Clinton’s home"
- WSJ -
The story revolves around the connection between the emails and the Clinton Foundation into which foreign govts could send bribes. These bribes were
allegedly paid in exchange for Hillary signing off (as Secretary of State), which allowed them to purchase billions of dollars worth of military
"Under Clinton's leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given
money to the Clinton Foundation, according to an IBTimes analysis of State Department and foundation data .. In all, governments and corporations
involved in the arms deals approved by Clinton’s State Department have delivered between $54 million and $141 million to the Clinton Foundation"
While the connection between Weiners laptop and incriminating emails is being dismissed and downplayed in the MSM, the WSJ has obtained statements
from sources inside the FBI that contradict that narrative.
When Comey made his initial closing statements to congress regarding the email probe, he outlined many instances where Clinton had broken the law.
According to Comey he did not have sufficient evidence to prove intent, however Clinton's reaction was to erase emails from the server, to destroy
electronic devices, to say "I don't recall" 39 times under questioning and also to lie many times - all of this is evidence of intent. Clearly it is
Trey Gowdy, not Loretta Lynch who should be Attorney General of the United States - the following video is a short, sharp look at Gowdy's interaction
Video: Gowdy vs Comey
Despite clear evidence of both breaches of the law and also abundant evidence of intent, Comey did not lay charges - and this may indicate that Comey
has been compromised (perhaps blackmail or extortion).
Mc. Cabe, the officer later placed in charge of the investigation certainly appears to be compromised because his wife received a donation from the
Clinton's (indirectly, via Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe a Clinton Foundation board member) of around $675,000.
However the Justice Dept, ruled that Mc. Cabe is NOT compromised because that had happened before he was assigned the case - somehow the $675,000 gift
to his wife does NOT create a conflict of interest. However, Wikileaks information clearly reveals a connection between Hillary and the Justice Dept.
and this is an extremely lax ruling, which may indicate collusion.
Just prior to Comey's final statements regarding a decision whether or not to lay charges against Hillary, Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton had what
they thought was a secret meeting on Bill's aircraft on the tarmac. The details are obviously not available - but this is highly suspicious behavior.
Yesterday Attorney General Loretta Lynch also declined to answer questions regarding a secret payment to Iran of $1.7 billion that appears to be
related to the content of the emails.
While Hillary was SoS a payment of $1.7 billion dollars was made from the US to Iran, with an initial cash payment of $400 million. This was
apparently cash - loaded onto pallets and flown to Tehran in the middle of the night.
There seems to be at least two very unlikely reasons being proposed for
these payments. Firstly that it was a payment in order to secure the release of American prisoners from Iran - but details regarding these hostages do
not seem to be available. What were their names, what were the circumstances of their capture and detention - and why such a huge payment? The other
reason seems even less likely, it was to fulfill a contract dating back to 1979 regarding fighter jets.
The jets were never delivered to Iran .. but why now? Why the
secrecy? In addition, there is a rumor that Iran requested the release of Iranian prisoners from the US .. and their demand was met.
This arrangement was subject to some very unusual and extreme security measures, and the relevant documents were placed in a holding room to which
basically nobody is allowed access. Those who are allowed access are not permitted to carry any kind of recording devices.
The logical conclusion is that Iran may have come into possession of damning evidence against Hillary and perhaps also against Obama himself.
Certainly Wikileaks emails show that Obama had sent emails to Hillary's secret server and used a non official email (sans .gov). It looks like Iran
leveraged its knowledge of corruption in order to negotiate what are otherwise very strange and inexplicable deals.
The heads of the FBI both Comey and McCabe give every indication that they have been comprised - and despite massive internal pressure from FBI
officers they have not laid any charges, or pursued the investigation in a forthright manner.
"agents were given a much starker instruction on the case: “Stand down.” When agents questioned why they weren’t allowed to take more
aggressive steps, they said they were told the order had come from the deputy director—Mr. McCabe.
Some FBI agents were dissatisfied with that answer [not to prosecute], and asked for permission to make a similar request to federal prosecutors in
Manhattan, according to people familiar with the matter. Mr. McCabe, these people said, told them no and added that they could not “go
The investigation into the Clinton Foundation had also begun separately within the FBI, but the investigation had run into problems .. of a top down
"Early this year, four FBI field offices—New York, Los Angeles, Washington and Little Rock, Ark.—were collecting information about the Clinton
Foundation to see if there was evidence of financial crimes or influence-peddling ..
In February, FBI officials made a presentation to the Justice Department, according to these people. By all accounts, the meeting didn’t go well.
Some said that is because the FBI didn’t present compelling evidence .. Others said that from the start, the Justice Department officials were
stern, icy and dismissive of the case."
“That was one of the weirdest meetings I’ve ever been to,” one participant told others afterward"
edit on 31-10-2016 by
Amagnon because: (no reason given)