It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
I have seen many here on ATS call for armed revolution, even some of our politicians. There seem to be many that do not understand the concept.
Purely hypothetical concept.
1. Donald Trump is elected President
2. I decide to start a revolution, damn I need some armed followers. First thing we are going to do is break some laws, and then they will send LE after us, now I need more followers.
3. If we are successful, and defeat LE, we have broken more laws, now they will send the military after us. Part of the military might be with us in idea, but they have to follow orders. Now we need more followers that are not keyboard warriors, in this day and age, don't see that happening.
Can a revolt happen, maybe, but there is no one worth a snap that is a leader.
Just a conversation starter, to see if there are any actual leaders out there, none of our current politicians seem to have that ability. I am tired of hearing these calls for armed conflict, those calling for it have no f'n idea.
a reply to: BubbaJoe
The problem with revolution is always what comes after.
Who's to say that the revolution will bring a positive change?
Who's to say what happens after a side, "loses".
Kill 'em? Camps? Jail?
Revolution is a fun idea to some, but an ugly reality to anyone else.