It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Launch imminent of 'phase three' of Wikileaks election coverage

page: 1
25
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 06:26 PM
link   


Wikileaks enigmatically announced on Twitter that it would soon launch “phase three of [its] election coverage.”

The secrets-sharing site put politicians on notice Sunday evening in a tweet that also included a plea for donations.

“We transition to phrase [sic] three of our US election coverage next week. Keep us strong: shop....__._/donate,” wrote the site.



Launch imminent of 'phase three' of Wikileaks election coverage

This could be interesting.

Phase 1 & 2 were, I assume, the DNC & Podesta leaks...


& we all know people save the best for last...

Not an October Surprise, but a bombshell likely days before the election will definitely sway public opinion.

They did also say;

Julian Assange, the head of Wikileaks, has stated that he would publish information from Trump if the site were sent any.



So maybe in the future, but for now I'd assume it's more about Hillary.


Speculate away ATS!




posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 06:29 PM
link   
Phase three?

Is the next release going to put us to sleep?

Because the last few haven't really exposed any earth shattering news.

Where's the kaboom?




posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 06:33 PM
link   
Heating up the popcorn now!

Kimdotcom alluded that Hillarys deleted bleachbit emails werent exactly deleted.

Someones got something major and the best presents are always opened last



posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 06:39 PM
link   
One wonders if Part Three will just give more fodder for Jason Chaffetz to investigate in Congress ad infinitum or if it will drive a stake through the heart of the Clinton presidential campaign or if Trump and the Republicans will find themselves in the crosshairs.


+9 more 
posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: grey580

Really? I'm not so sure. The emails reveal an inner working that you, me and the rest of us long suspected and confirmed. However, to the normal everyday citizen that doesnt frequent OUR sites or of our frame of reference will deem any of the emails as earth shattering to them AND there are more of them then us.
So yes, earth shattering to the public, confirmation to us tinfoil wearers.


+13 more 
posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 06:49 PM
link   
a reply to: grey580

No kaboom.

Tell that to the former head of the DNC WHO WAS FORCED TO RESIGN IN DISGRACE and her replacement who is now following suit.

Tell that to the Dem operatives exposed by Veritas and corroborated by leaked emails thanks to Wikileaks.

Tell that to the shell-shocked Hillary campaign and voter base being relentlessly bombed out of existence.
edit on 30-10-2016 by Deny Arrogance because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 06:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408

I'm skeptical that there will be any smoking gun/bombshell in the next release, although i hope there is.

I don't understand the reasoning behind releasing a potential bombshell After early voting has started and millions have already cast their vote.

If they had something that would stop her why didn't they release it sooner? The early votes could've made a difference in an election like this.



posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 06:52 PM
link   
Would anyone care to guess why Wikileaks deleted their tweet?
Somethings really off with them.



posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 06:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: EchoesInTime
a reply to: Hazardous1408

I'm skeptical that there will be any smoking gun/bombshell in the next release, although i hope there is.

I don't understand the reasoning behind releasing a potential bombshell After early voting has started and millions have already cast their vote.

If they had something that would stop her why didn't they release it sooner? The early votes could've made a difference in an election like this.


Imho and the weird part is, that the wikileaks themselves have been ignored through october, the only real impact on Hillary has been from the FBI, NOT wikileaks.

Makes ya think eh...



posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 06:54 PM
link   
We've had the DNC batch and the Podesta batch. What batch would be equal to or better? Humadin's?



posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 06:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Belgianbeer

They haven been doing that the last couple of weeks, even mentioned on a gaming forum, I frequent the Bungie Destiny forums myself in Off Topic.



posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 06:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
We've had the DNC batch and the Podesta batch. What batch would be equal to or better? Humadin's?


Maybe the 33,000 deleted emails?



posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 06:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Kalixi

Of course they weren't Deleted.


What people should realize that this is beyond "Destroying a Candidate" and more about providing Transparency to the Corruption that America is.


+11 more 
posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 06:58 PM
link   
I laugh how a poster on here thinks these leaks have not had an effect. You will be hearing about these emails for years to come, There have been so many emails released in such a short time people haven't had a chance to go through them properly and make the connections, Already several people have resigned and corruption exposed.

You will be hearing about these emails on a regular basis for the next decade or more, Your grandkids will know of these emails.



posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 07:06 PM
link   
One minor problem. More than 20% of people have already voted. I wonder if Assange & Co realize what a difference a preponderance of mail-in ballots means these days? It's not like we all go to a voting booth on Election Day and cast our ballots.
edit on 10/30/2016 by schuyler because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 07:12 PM
link   
a reply to: schuyler

I don't think their mission is to sway an election, but rather provide education on the broken system to influence future ones.

They are not partisan, their true damage was to Bush, I think they attack the dynasty families that push establishment more than anything IMHO.



posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 07:20 PM
link   
maybe it doesn`t matter how many have already voted because the next batch will be so incriminating that Hillary ,or the DNC,will have to withdraw her candidacy?
The DNC wouldn`t want the first female president to be impeached and removed from office the day after she is sworn in.It would be far better to throw her under the bus and remove her and let her be convicted and sent to jail as a private citizen.



posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 07:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: schuyler
One minor problem. More than 20% of people have already voted. I wonder if Assange & Co realize what a difference a preponderance of mail-in ballots means these days? It's not like we all go to a voting booth on Election Day and cast our ballots.


What you just said is the reason CBS News gave today for "October Surprises" not having much effect any more.



posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 07:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Tardacus

You'd think. In a sane world. In a sane party. In a sane populace. Etc.

a reply to: schuyler

A pity.
edit on 30-10-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 30 2016 @ 07:22 PM
link   
Did wikileaks just delete that tweet?
twitter.com...




top topics



 
25
<<   2 >>

log in

join