It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Reports: Emails Had Nothing to Do With Clinton

page: 1
32
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+7 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:22 PM
link   


The emails that Donald Trump has claimed will bring down Hillary Clinton are not quite the bombshell that he thinks, reports said Saturday. The revelation about new emails related to Hillary Clinton came out Friday, after FBI Director James Comey sent a letter to Congress on the matter, a move that triggered panic and sent stocks plunging. Trump quickly swept up the story and told supporters the scandal would be “bigger than Watergate.” Yet an official told the Los Angeles Times late Friday that the emails in question weren’t sent to or from Clinton, nor did they contain any new information. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Comey’s letter to Congress was more a formality than anything else. NBC’s Pete Williams later reiterated that, saying FBI sources had told him that not only were the emails not from Clinton, but they had nothing to do with her. Williams also noted that the investigation had not been “reopened,” since the probe had never been closed to begin with “as a purely technical thing.” The content of the emails has not been disclosed.

www.thedailybeast.com...


More proof Comie did a deliberate political hit job


He had to know this would be earth shattering politically
edit on 29-10-2016 by Willtell because: (no reason given)


IMPORTANT: New (old) Standards Are Being Enforced (again) For New Threads
edit on Tue Nov 1 2016 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:24 PM
link   
Link to source?



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:25 PM
link   
Last I heard they don't even know what's in the emails. But there were reports some were saying hte emails were just copies of emails which already existed and were known about. Maybe an investigation was opened to find out why this device wasn't known earlier. HOw'd they miss it? Or maybe another detail. None of it (yet) incriminating. And of course Trump alleges it's incriminating, but that's completely expected and easily ignored.
edit on 10/29/2016 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)


+38 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:25 PM
link   
This scandal is entirely worse than watergate...

33,000 emails more than outweighs 8 minutes of tape...

The scandals size is determined by the media which refuses to report anything negative about the Infallible Queen...

If the media felt the same disdain for Hillary they did for tricky dick then this scandal would be bigger than anything in political history....it would dwarf watergate and teapot dome....

-Chris


+37 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:26 PM
link   
"this is not happening, this is not happening, this is not happening..."

Sorry to tell you, but your cult leader is in big problem



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone



33,000 emails more than outweighs 8 minutes of tape...


It was 18 minutes of tape missing.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

Hope everyone is enjoying the Frankist Zevite Show


+9 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:29 PM
link   
a reply to: SgtHamsandwich

It's the daily beast.

I understand not wanting to source that.


+19 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nikola014
"this is not happening, this is not happening, this is not happening..."

Sorry to tell you, but your cult leader is in big problem

This is getting closer to reality than ever:




+12 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

Even if it is a hit piece, I noticed the left had no problem with 30+ year stories of Trump touching people a month before elections? What do you call that?

And if you say all that was true, well so is this. We all know she did wrongdoing. She used a forensic cleaner on evidence that was subpoenaed.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

From what I read, Huma Abedin had some kind of printer problem, and forwarded the emails in question to a personal computer, that she shared with her husband, Anthony Weiner, in order to "plug it in" to a printer, so that she could print out the emails for Hillary Clinton's review.

If anyone should be censored or punished for this breech, it should be Huma Abedin.


+1 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:32 PM
link   


Report: Lynch Advised Comey Against Letter to Congress


www.thedailybeast.com...

I predict this will go down as the sleazierst action by a FBI head in history equaling the acts of J Edgar Hoover.

People don't realize yet the enormity of what he did. He literally may have handed a lunatic the presidential election.

Comie obviously delibretly injected himself into a losing campaign.

Trump and his supporters are squealing like stuck pigs and Comey HAD TO KNOW HIS ACT WOULD DO THIS!



Attorney General Loretta Lynch advised FBI Director James Comey against sending a letter to Congress about the review of new Hillary Clinton emails, The New Yorker reported Saturday. Citing an unnamed source in the Obama administration, the report said Lynch urged Comey against taking any actions that might sway the outcome of the Nov. 8 vote, in accordance with a longstanding practice in the department. Comey, however, said he felt “an obligation” to send the letter in light of the fact that he’d earlier testified about the investigation. Comey is now under fire for breaking with the policy of the Justice Department to avoid commenting on investigations involving a presidential candidate when it can be viewed as meddling in the election. One former official told The New Yorker, “You don’t do this. It’s aberrational. It violates decades of practice.” While it’s unclear how Comey’s letter will affect the election, Trump has already seized on the news, reacting with glee on Friday night. He told a crowd of supporters in New Hampshire that the new emails showed Clinton had engaged in corruption “on a scale we have never seen before.”

edit on 29-10-2016 by Willtell because: (no reason given)


+1 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Willtell

Even if it is a hit piece, I noticed the left had no problem with 30+ year stories of Trump touching people a month before elections? What do you call that?

And if you say all that was true, well so is this. We all know she did wrongdoing. She used a forensic cleaner on evidence that was subpoenaed.


That’s NOT from an FBI director

Also Trump created that scandal himself.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:35 PM
link   
The FBI has so much admitted it released this statement to cover their asses. If something did in fact turn up, they would have been accused of trying to hide it, so they just ousted it. It's nothing, and Hillary wants it released NOW to show that's it's nothing, and I don't blame her. This is potentially damaging for her because of -people like the ones- well, everybody knows the type, plenty of them here on this site.

They've set off a huge amount of smoke, but there is probably NO fire. Now they need to man up, put up, or shut up.


+28 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

If there is nothing "there" then the campaign wouldn't be in such panic mode.

Their reactions against your claims simply do not match.


+22 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell



The emails that Donald Trump has claimed will bring down Hillary Clinton are not quite the bombshell that he thinks, reports said Saturday. The revelation about new emails related to Hillary Clinton came out Friday, after FBI Director James Comey sent a letter to Congress on the matter, a move that triggered panic and sent stocks plunging. Trump quickly swept up the story and told supporters the scandal would be “bigger than Watergate.” Yet an official told the Los Angeles Times late Friday that the emails in question weren’t sent to or from Clinton, nor did they contain any new information. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Comey’s letter to Congress was more a formality than anything else. NBC’s Pete Williams later reiterated that, saying FBI sources had told him that not only were the emails not from Clinton, but they had nothing to do with her. Williams also noted that the investigation had not been “reopened,” since the probe had never been closed to begin with “as a purely technical thing.” The content of the emails has not been disclosed.


More proof Comie did a deliberate political hit job


He had to know this would be earth shattering politically


So in 24 hours it's changed from "we found emails that appear to pertinent to the previous investigation" to "not a damn one of these has anything to do with the previous investigation and my attempt to 'do a deliberate political hit job' has already been found out."

Incredible.


edit on 29-10-2016 by Shamrock6 because: (no reason given)


+20 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Willtell

Even if it is a hit piece, I noticed the left had no problem with 30+ year stories of Trump touching people a month before elections? What do you call that?

And if you say all that was true, well so is this. We all know she did wrongdoing. She used a forensic cleaner on evidence that was subpoenaed.


That’s NOT from an FBI director

Also Trump created that scandal himself.


Hillary created this scandal herself by breaking the law.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:37 PM
link   
Trump talked about rigged election.

Comey just rigged the election in his favor.

Trump is going around squealing like a pig in delight.

If people don’t see his true nature them whatever he as president will wrought is deserving


+21 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Willtell

Even if it is a hit piece, I noticed the left had no problem with 30+ year stories of Trump touching people a month before elections? What do you call that?

And if you say all that was true, well so is this. We all know she did wrongdoing. She used a forensic cleaner on evidence that was subpoenaed.


That’s NOT from an FBI director

Also Trump created that scandal himself.


Clinton's "carelessness" created this scandal for herself.


+2 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Willtell

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Willtell

Even if it is a hit piece, I noticed the left had no problem with 30+ year stories of Trump touching people a month before elections? What do you call that?

And if you say all that was true, well so is this. We all know she did wrongdoing. She used a forensic cleaner on evidence that was subpoenaed.


That’s NOT from an FBI director

Also Trump created that scandal himself.


Hillary created this scandal herself by breaking the law.



What law did she break?

NONE!

Your just espousing Trump propaganda.

You really feel offended by Hillary's actions in the email scandal and don't feel offended by Trump's groping



new topics

top topics



 
32
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join