It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

A theory - Weiner, Huma, Clinton, unsecured email, wikileaks and an indictment...

page: 1
68
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+31 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:12 AM
link   
So a journalist by the name of H. A. Goodman laid out his theory of what has happened that prompted the FBI to reopen the investigation.

Anthony Weiner - Huma
As we all know he was caught sending inappropriate images / text messages to a 15 year old girl. During the FBI investigation of Weiner they seized a laptop he was using to communicate with her. It was discovered that he also had messaged between 20 and 100 other women using the lap top. When the FBI began going through the laptop they found the laptop actually belonged to Huma and that this laptop was also used by her to send / receive classified info from the Clinton server.

The laptop and her home network were unsecured. it also contained classified information / SAP information. This was never disclosed to the FBI during the Clinton investigation by Huma.

Wikileaks - Huma / Mills
The 1-21 email dumps exposed communications by Clinton aides (Huma / Mills / Blumenthal / Podesta) that they knew of the existence of Clinton's server, they discussed the server, had technical issues with the server, all the while telling the FBI they did not know about the private server.

Using media reports going back to 2015 he walks you through the connections between everyone involved that has been confirmed by wikileaks.

The one element Comey said was missing to prosecute Clinton was "intent". Taking all the info into account, including the new Weiner info and wikileaks 21 and info Judicial watch received from 2015, intent can be clearly established.

* - They knew of the private server.
* - They sent / received classified / SAP information over the server.
* - They lied to the FBI when they claimed they did not know about the server.
* - They took steps to hide the existence of the server.
* - They took steps to delete information from the server that would implicate all involved in several federal crimes.
* - Podesta was warned several times his email account was being hacked and to change his email password.
* - Blumenthals account was hacked.
* - They knew they were not suppose to be using her server for what they were doing.


Below is a 15 minute video where he goes through his theory and ties it all together. keep in mind it is just a theory but it makes sense.





Ironically Weiners pickle placed everyone else in a pickle.

If his theory is accurate then an investigation wont be needed since the FBI already did that. If the new info shows the intent, it means those involved lied to the FBI, nullifying their immunity agreements. It means they could go for immediate indictments.

Assuming of course his theory is accurate.

Additional info -



edit on 29-10-2016 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 03:27 AM
link   
Nm
edit on 10292016 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 03:28 AM
link   

edit on 10292016 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)


+16 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 05:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

I love it.

Hillary's vast criminal enterprise taken down by her aide's pervert husband.

Hopefully it sticks.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 06:04 AM
link   
Now this is amusing, of all the back tracking and destroying devices did Huma just give this device away thinking that's all you have to do?

As a router user i'm more concerned by a high profile politicians aide much less the former Secretary of state's aide using an unsecured connection at home. Just take it out of the box and install. Crazy. Good thing these new routers come secured for our National Security's sake.



(post by Floridagoat removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 07:59 AM
link   
a reply to: Floridagoat


did Huma just give this device away thinking that's all you have to do?


It certainly looks that way, since the device would atleast had to date back to 2013 . or a newer device and they were discussing what too do about Server/Email scandal. you would think Huma would know there are ways to acquire that which has been deleted, mayby not



Hillary Clinton -Secretary of State from January 21, 2009 – February 1, 2013


-Anthony Weiner Sexting scandals-

-On May 27, 2011, Weiner sent a link of a explicit photograph of himself via Twitter, and admitted he had exchanged messages of an explicit nature with about six women over the last three years.

-On July 23, 2013, during Weiner's run for New York City mayor. It was revealed he sent Explicit photos to a woman with whom Weiner had contact as late as April 2013

-On August 28, 2016, the New York Post reported that Weiner had sexted a purportedly underage girl

-On September 22, 2016 the FBI requested a subpoena of cellphones and other records.




edit on 29-10-2016 by Ostracized because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 08:46 AM
link   
The theory doesn't explain why Huma would let her estranged husband have possession of the device?



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 08:55 AM
link   
a reply to: kosmicjack

My theory is that it was meant to be destroyed. I think I may have said this to you already, if so I apologize.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 09:05 AM
link   
a reply to: kosmicjack




The theory doesn't explain why Huma would let her estranged husband have possession of the device?


she may have not known he was using it when she wasn't around. you know most people do not carry both their laptop and cell phone 24/7.


+6 more 
posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 09:06 AM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

Or it's his insurance policy. Dirt on Hillary and Bill.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 09:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

If I understand correctly that this device and information was "found" during the investigation into Weiner's sexually deviant behavior, is it possible that Weiner turned it all over to the Feds in exchange for immunity in his own criminal investigation? Is that possible? Would the Feds consider it more important to charge and prosecute HRC for her crimes than Weiner for his crimes? Or do the Feds only grant immunity to those involved directly in that case?



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 09:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Not sure if this vid supports the theory of this thread . I guess there can be lots of different angles but going by the many of them it looks real bad for the behind the scenes manipulators ,who ever they turn out to be . "Published on Oct 29, 2016
SHOCKING NEWS: The hackers supplying Wikileaks were Anonymous and Anon claims to have ALL OF HILLARY's 33k deleted emails and that they will release them by Nov 1.
Hillary together with Obama, was planning WW3 with Russia to forego criminal charges!
- ‘Assange Steps Forward To Deliver Final Blow To The Clinton Campaign’ after FBI Reopen "



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 11:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: kosmicjack
The theory doesn't explain why Huma would let her estranged husband have possession of the device?



They used to be married... Shes running an election and my guess would be it slipped her mind.

Also another possible idea of what occurred.





posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 11:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Boadicea

I dont think he could get immunity for something like that. The computer was one he and his wife both used but it apparently was Huma's.

I am taking away from this the FBI investigating weiner took the laptop since he used it to scam on children and during their investigation they came across the information concerning the Clinton investigation.

Immunity is generally offered for a person who has information that is needed to continue moving up the food chain of criminal behavior, I would guess he didnt know about the emails concerning Huma.
edit on 29-10-2016 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 11:59 AM
link   
a reply to: the2ofusr1

Its possible however the one flaw in the info is going to war to prevent criminal charges. The President can pardon anyone involved, including himself, before anyone is ever charged.

That would end a prosecution however the backlash would be detrimental to Obama / Clinton from the American people.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 12:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra


Immunity is generally offered for a person who has information that is needed to continue moving up the food chain of criminal behavior...


Thank you. That was kinda sorta my gut feeling, but I wasn't sure. I shall now put that thought on the back burner... although part of me suspects Weiner would have if he could have just for petty revenge! All's fair in love and divorce, eh?



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 12:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Xcathdra


Immunity is generally offered for a person who has information that is needed to continue moving up the food chain of criminal behavior...


Thank you. That was kinda sorta my gut feeling, but I wasn't sure. I shall now put that thought on the back burner... although part of me suspects Weiner would have if he could have just for petty revenge! All's fair in love and divorce, eh?


Lol politics make strange bed fellows.. That turn of phrase seems to hit the nail on the head with whats going on.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 03:49 PM
link   
I have to wonder if maybe both Hillary and Huma married for convenience.

Now if you think really sleazy and suppose Huma was Hillarys lover. Suppose years later it was suggested to her to take a Husband so she could work closer with Hilary and not look gay, to take a husband who had a weakness that they could use to keep him inline just as Hillary did.

Hillary and Huma may know things about their husbands beyond anything that has come out, and they stick with their Men for the very reason they married.

And/or Hillary wanted to continue her own career eventually through Huma whose husband ran for Mayor of NYC in 2013 and could have eventually worked up to President the same as the Clintons did but under Clinton (Hillary) control. The baby was needed just as the Clintons need a child in order to get into office.



The top aide to Hillary Clinton says meeting Clinton was “amazing,” and that she remembers thinking about the now-Democrat presidential candidate, “Oh my God, she’s so beautiful and she’s so little!”
“You know these things that happen in your life that just stick?” Huma Abedin said in a Call Your Girlfriend podcast interview. “She walked by and she shook my hand and our eyes connected and I just remember having this moment where I thought, “Wow.

www.breitbart.com...



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 03:51 PM
link   
This has to do with that despicable Weiner, the incurable exhibitionist.

I'm thinking Hillary sent him an email asking him to stop showing his pee-pee to everybody on the internet.



new topics

top topics



 
68
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join