It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I am writing regarding your public statement in July, 2016 informing the American people that the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was being closed without referring it to a Federal Grand Jury or the Attorney General of the U. S. for a decision whether or not to indict her. Strangely, you eloquently laid out enough of the evidence deduced from the investigation to strongly indicate there was abundant evidence uncovered during the investigation and interview of her to not only indict but to convict her in Federal Court. However, you personally re-worded and soft-pedaled the actions she took as Secretary of State describing her actions as "extremely careless” in using a personal email and un-secured server.
Sorry, but NO SIR, MS Clinton was not merely careless or extremely careless. She was not even negligent or grossly negligent (as the statute requires). Hillary Clinton was knowingly purposeful in her decisions and actions to set up a server under her exclusive control and possession in order to control what information was available to the American public and Congress regarding her actions as Secretary of State. Furthermore, she took those government owned communications into her personal possession after leaving her position and knowingly and willingly attempted to destroy them so her nefarious actions could never be known or used as evidence of her corrupt moral character against her
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Most people I know already knew all of these things, which made it even more stunning to see the arrogance and gullibility of her supporters, trying to defend her against what has always been so blatantly obvious. A willful and determined effort on her part to criminally hide and abuse the laws written to prevent these abuses, but she knowingly did them anyways, to the point of obscenity. She should be convicted and then decapitated for good measure.
originally posted by: WhateverYouSay
a reply to: Rosinitiate
I'll tell you something I don't get.
From a community that is a conspiracy website that is supposedly anti authoritarian, to be so hell bent on hating Clinton because she was careless with classified material.
I get the hate that she's corrupt, I get the hate that she's a liar and elitist, all of those things. But I personally don't believe that guy from the NSA that was taking his work home with him should be locked up either, I sincerely hope he isn't. If they want to bring Clinton up on corruption charges, I'm all for it, if they want to allege that money has been illegally influencing politics, then yes please, charge her and anyone else who has been guilty of that. If she gets brought down on handling classified material and not the other stuff it actually goes well to cement the negative authoritarian ways in which America has been heading without ameliorating any of the corruption, when there is the opportunity to do just that.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
Well she used to be a lawyer so let's put aside the idea "she didn't know".
And she even said it herself she has extensive knowledge on how to deal with classified information.
The narrative is beyond a joke and has transcended into blatant disregard for the law, or even trying to appear to follow such.
originally posted by: In4ormant