It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: watchitburn
Unprecedented circumstances need unprecedented actions? What if (as I said in my OP) something "came out" showing this entire election being rigged or a farce on both sides of the fence? At the very least, wouldn't a delay take place? Obama stays in office as the interim?
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Cygnis
No.
I can't provide insight into the Army, Navy and Chairforce. But The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Dunford is a Hard Core Constitutionalist and Gen Neller, the USMC Commandant is a solid honest dude.
Additionally, one of the main reasons there is such a large military presence during the inauguration is to ensure a peaceful transition of power. Most non-military folks don't notice or realize the implications or seriousness of it. But rest assured, we take it very seriously.
Anecdotally, in 2013 Obama's inauguration team was pissed when they learned that the Marines were going to march in the parade with functioning M1s (keep in mind they weren't loaded and everyone was searched for ammo before hand). We had to actually threaten to leak it to the press that Obama didn't trust the Marines with his security before they relented.
originally posted by: Cygnis
a reply to: schuyler
Should the threat of Russia rear it's ugly head, he would have precedent to do so.
That is what is scary here, as there are issues with Russia presently for this to happen.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: Cygnis
Yup, add in the ongoing Russian factors boiling over to a head and a 3rd term is possible.
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: Cygnis
a reply to: schuyler
Should the threat of Russia rear it's ugly head, he would have precedent to do so.
That is what is scary here, as there are issues with Russia presently for this to happen.
No, he would not have a "precedent." A "precedent" means it has happened before. Your suggesting that would be an "excuse," but the "precedent" there is WW II when we had an election in the middle of it. Once again, there is no provision for delaying a national election. None.
Precedent, noun
1. An earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances:
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: Cygnis
Yup, add in the ongoing Russian factors boiling over to a head and a 3rd term is possible.
No, it is not. The 22nd amendment says,
"Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice"