It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

BREAKING: Clinton Email Case Just Reopened!

page: 95
284
<< 92  93  94    96  97  98 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: mkultra11
People are just going to have accept that Hillary/Clinton are probably the most corrupt politicians to ever hold office, run for office in our nation's history and stop vehemently defending her. Its al her own and her campaign teams fault, not yours. Just let it go, let the chips fall where they may.


Not even close.

Two Bushes ran. A Nixon.

Both Clintons taken together have nothing on those master criminals.

30000 emails versus 22 MILLION.


And yet only one out of all the ones you mentioned has been impeached...Bill Clinton....one of only 2 Presidents in history to have such an honor....


Was Bill Clinton actually impeached?


Yes....He and Andrew Johnson are the only two Presidents in history to have that distinction.


No, he wasn't. He was acquitted in the Senate.


Are you serious? You don't think Clinton was impeached? I will just disregard every post you have ever made now...




posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: mkultra11
People are just going to have accept that Hillary/Clinton are probably the most corrupt politicians to ever hold office, run for office in our nation's history and stop vehemently defending her. Its al her own and her campaign teams fault, not yours. Just let it go, let the chips fall where they may.


Not even close.

Two Bushes ran. A Nixon.

Both Clintons taken together have nothing on those master criminals.

30000 emails versus 22 MILLION.


Keep fooling yourself. Nixon and Watergate is shoplifting compared to what the Clintons have done. Hillary fully supported the Iraq war voted for and said it's a business opportunity. Bushes are voting for Hillary. You might be taken seriously on CNN with your crap, but not here.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:04 PM
link   
why wouldn't Comey make sure the e-mails were relevant? Comey knew that announcing this before the election would affect the election, he's not that stupid to think it wouldn't



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:04 PM
link   
An MIT "human network explorer" titled ClintonCircle sourced from the DNC Leak on Wikileaks..

clinton.media.mit.edu...


Any analysts familiar with this stuff and can share any significance to the data presented?

 


here's the one created from the Podesta files:

clinton.media.mit.edu...


and one using Clinton Emails:

clinton.media.mit.edu...



edit on Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:11:03 -0500 by JacKatMtn because: add links



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Exactly as i suggested ... you don't care about law and order, rule of law, right and wrong ... or you would be APALLED that the President of the United States and high members of his cabinet used a private email server and destroyed 22 MILLION emails some under subpoena from Congress.

It doesn't matter if it is 8 years ago or 80. It's the principle, which you have clearly demonstrated means NOTHING to you.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: mkultra11
People are just going to have accept that Hillary/Clinton are probably the most corrupt politicians to ever hold office, run for office in our nation's history and stop vehemently defending her. Its al her own and her campaign teams fault, not yours. Just let it go, let the chips fall where they may.


Not even close.

Two Bushes ran. A Nixon.

Both Clintons taken together have nothing on those master criminals.

30000 emails versus 22 MILLION.


And yet only one out of all the ones you mentioned has been impeached...Bill Clinton....one of only 2 Presidents in history to have such an honor....

Nope, he wasn't convicted.


Umm....wrong on the impeachment question.

No - he wasn't convicted but *yes* he was impeached and the subject of a congressional impeachment.


edit on 10/29/2016 by Riffrafter because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: mkultra11
People are just going to have accept that Hillary/Clinton are probably the most corrupt politicians to ever hold office, run for office in our nation's history and stop vehemently defending her. Its al her own and her campaign teams fault, not yours. Just let it go, let the chips fall where they may.


Not even close.

Two Bushes ran. A Nixon.

Both Clintons taken together have nothing on those master criminals.

30000 emails versus 22 MILLION.


And yet only one out of all the ones you mentioned has been impeached...Bill Clinton....one of only 2 Presidents in history to have such an honor....


Was Bill Clinton actually impeached?


Yes....He and Andrew Johnson are the only two Presidents in history to have that distinction.


No, he wasn't. He was acquitted in the Senate.


Ok sparky listen up.

An impeachment has 2 stages. The first stage is laying out the charges and voting to indict (impeach) or not indict. The House approved the impeachment of Clinton.

The Senate gets phase 2 - the trial. They voted not guilty.

Clinton was in fact impeached. Clinton was in fact found not guilty.

Either learn history / how our government operates or stop trying to argue a point you know nothing about.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:05 PM
link   
Please do not forget:

William W. Belknap

US Secretary of War 1869-1876.


Belknap was charged with high crimes and impeachment process was started. Belknap resigned his office to avoid impeachment, but was impeached by the Senate regardless of the fact he was no longer in office.


The precedent is already there.

en.wikipedia.org...


Starting on April 5, 1876, Belknap was tried by the Senate, presided over by Supreme Court Chief Justice Morrison Waite. For several weeks Senators argued whether the Senate had jurisdiction to put Belknap on trial since he already resigned office in March.Belknap's defense managers argued that the Senate had no jurisdiction to put Belknap on trial.The Senate, however, had ruled by a vote of 37-29 that it had jurisdiction to impeach Belknap, despite his resignation in March.

edit on R072016-10-29T14:07:12-05:00k0710Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)

edit on R082016-10-29T14:08:48-05:00k0810Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:06 PM
link   
Did not see this posted yet, if so apologies.

DOJ Objected to FBI Disclosure of New Steps In Clinton Probe


Justice Department officials were also concerned about the planned disclosure because the FBI had yet to review the newly discovered emails.

"We don't know what this is yet," one source said, noting that authorities are still seeking a judge's approval to start taking a closer look at the emails. No one knows if "there is any 'there' there," the source added.

But Comey "decided to move forward anyway," another source said.



The device/devices were shared by both Weiners.

Tens of thousands of emails stored on the device/s.

This will not be resolved before the election.

Evidence points to hoarding of sensitive government information.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: mkultra11

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: mkultra11
People are just going to have accept that Hillary/Clinton are probably the most corrupt politicians to ever hold office, run for office in our nation's history and stop vehemently defending her. Its al her own and her campaign teams fault, not yours. Just let it go, let the chips fall where they may.


Not even close.

Two Bushes ran. A Nixon.

Both Clintons taken together have nothing on those master criminals.

30000 emails versus 22 MILLION.


Keep fooling yourself. Nixon and Watergate is shoplifting compared to what the Clintons have done. Hillary fully supported the Iraq war voted for and said it's a business opportunity. Bushes are voting for Hillary. You might be taken seriously on CNN with your crap, but not here.


The only thing I occasionally fool myself about i that there are any people on the right here that care about the truth or about facts. On that, mea culpa.

You don't speak for "here." You're one voice. So many of you seem to think hat your own beliefs are the beliefs of ATS.

There's more than a bit of narcissism there, friend.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: ZenTam
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

I think Obama's entwined in this mess also. We saw him on TV say he knew nothing about it and learned about it on TV like the public did. Yet we now have emails contradicting his very statement.

I'll go one step beyond and throw out some crazy theories, what if the Clinton's helped supply Weiner with some underage girls. Or they found evidence of Huma, working for and sending secrets to a foreign government with terrorist ties. Or anyone else for that matter working with or for a foreign government with terrorist ties. Perhaps its emails showing proof of pay to play thru the Clinton Foundation. Maybe emails confirming that the Clinton's did indeed have people killed to hide their dirty deeds. Or emails confirming the request, purchase and set up of the private server in Hillary's home by Hillary. And more emails discussing how to hide and keep it secret. Evidence that Huma was running the entire show after Hillary had her health issues with SOS. At this point it could be emails about anything, all of which they were trying to keep secret. Hopefully the FBI has the balls to follow thru and do whats right.



Geez , that is some Scary Sheite there . Nothing is Out of the Possibility of being True there .



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Exactly as i suggested ... you don't care about law and order, rule of law, right and wrong ... or you would be APALLED that the President of the United States and high members of his cabinet used a private email server and destroyed 22 MILLION emails some under subpoena from Congress.

It doesn't matter if it is 8 years ago or 80. It's the principle, which you have clearly demonstrated means NOTHING to you.


Here is a link to the White House's own media on it for your perusal....

Source



In 1998, as a result of issues surrounding personal indiscretions with a young woman White House intern, Clinton was the second U.S. president to be impeached by the House of Representatives. He was tried in the Senate and found not guilty of the charges brought against him. He apologized to the nation for his actions and continued to have unprecedented popular approval ratings for his job as president.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: mkultra11
People are just going to have accept that Hillary/Clinton are probably the most corrupt politicians to ever hold office, run for office in our nation's history and stop vehemently defending her. Its al her own and her campaign teams fault, not yours. Just let it go, let the chips fall where they may.


Not even close.

Two Bushes ran. A Nixon.

Both Clintons taken together have nothing on those master criminals.

30000 emails versus 22 MILLION.


And yet only one out of all the ones you mentioned has been impeached...Bill Clinton....one of only 2 Presidents in history to have such an honor....


Was Bill Clinton actually impeached?


Yes....He and Andrew Johnson are the only two Presidents in history to have that distinction.


No, he wasn't. He was acquitted in the Senate.


Grph, 'impeachment' is a process. So yes, Bill Clinton was impeached. But, he was not convicted.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:07 PM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

Nixon also resigned before he could be impeached, found guilty and removed.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:08 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

What "evidence" points to hoarding?

Where is the "evidence" about what's in the emails?

Comey stated clearly that he didn't know what was in them, apparently the agents investigating have to retrieve emails from the CLinton server for comparison ... so what "evidence" are you referring to?

I bet it's BELIEF not "evidence."

There is a difference.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
I think Obama says it best.....




LOL , Now that was some Ironically Funny Sheite coming from the Liar in Chief .



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

I am tired of talking about that member, but he will most likely just ignore your post and pretend like nothing happened, because he's not interested in facts, but rather in pushing his narrative

It's pretty sad if you ask me, how that type of behavior is allowed on ATS



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: mkultra11
People are just going to have accept that Hillary/Clinton are probably the most corrupt politicians to ever hold office, run for office in our nation's history and stop vehemently defending her. Its al her own and her campaign teams fault, not yours. Just let it go, let the chips fall where they may.


Not even close.

Two Bushes ran. A Nixon.

Both Clintons taken together have nothing on those master criminals.

30000 emails versus 22 MILLION.


And yet only one out of all the ones you mentioned has been impeached...Bill Clinton....one of only 2 Presidents in history to have such an honor....


Was Bill Clinton actually impeached?


Yes....He and Andrew Johnson are the only two Presidents in history to have that distinction.


No, he wasn't. He was acquitted in the Senate.


Ok sparky listen up.

An impeachment has 2 stages. The first stage is laying out the charges and voting to indict (impeach) or not indict. The House approved the impeachment of Clinton.

The Senate gets phase 2 - the trial. They voted not guilty.

Clinton was in fact impeached. Clinton was in fact found not guilty.

Either learn history / how our government operates or stop trying to argue a point you know nothing about.


Touché

The country as a whole needs some education



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: RickinVa

Hey Gryph,

What are you going to do when Trump wins and Hillary Clinton gets indicted?

Are you going to stay silent? Backtrack your claims? Or double down and call it all a conspiracy?



originally posted by: imjack

originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: Gryphon66

tick tock tick tock


someone could literally hack your computer and read a wiki-leak email, and you would be guilty of the same thing.

Most 'crimes' have 'intent' and can be directly traced to a 'motive'.

Crimes of incompetence do not include motive or intent.

To begin with, 18 USC, Section 798 provides in salient part:

“Whoever knowingly and willfully … [discloses] or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety and interest of the United States [certain categories of classified information] … shall be fined … or imprisoned.”



“Classified information, means information which, at the time of a violation of this section, is specifically designated by a United States Government Agency for … restricted dissemination.”


The statute also provides a definition of what constitutes classified information within the meaning of the subsection described above.

Post hoc classification, which seems to characterize most of the classified material found on Clinton’s server, cannot support an indictment under this section. Second, information no matter how obviously sensitive does not classify itself; it must be officially and specifically designated as such.

some rando law professor who worked for HLS.



posted on Oct, 29 2016 @ 02:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Exactly as i suggested ... you don't care about law and order, rule of law, right and wrong ... or you would be APALLED that the President of the United States and high members of his cabinet used a private email server and destroyed 22 MILLION emails some under subpoena from Congress.

It doesn't matter if it is 8 years ago or 80. It's the principle, which you have clearly demonstrated means NOTHING to you.


If stuff that happened years ago matters so much to you then why aren't you yelling at the LGBT crowd to dump Hillary.....I mean THIS WAS her speech



Where's the Lefty Liberal uproar from this?



new topics

top topics



 
284
<< 92  93  94    96  97  98 >>

log in

join