BREAKING: Clinton Email Case Just Reopened!

If she had trouble hiding her anger in the presser imagine what her staff is going through right now. She is demanding to know what they have. Jeffrey Toobin on CNN is saying that Comey doesn't have to say what they have and probably won't.

The Clinton News is really sweating it out. They can't spin it if they don't know what it is. Looks like Comey is going by the book this time. We will just have to wait for the "sources" to give hints.

originally posted by: HUMBLEONE

originally posted by: 200Plus
They brought up a good point if you listen to what they don't say...

The FBI is looking at emails to determine whether they are important.

All of a sudden this is headlines and everyone runs with it ass "FBI reopens Clinton case".

The parties involved bicker back and forth, which is great for TV drama.

Will this lead to anything of value? No.

What has fallen from the headlines?

Doug Band and Clinton Inc.

Could that have led to something important? Yes

Nice try. Time for all the Hillary Pouges to STFU. Don't you get it? This is, game over.

Ok.

Keep having your low intelligence fevered dreams that the corrupt FBI and DOJ are somehow at the last minute going to say:

"Yep, she did it. We didnt notice it after a year of looking but now that wiki told on us, the jig is up. Here's the truth..."

It's a headline to show "no one is above the law" until after the election.

Mid-November it'll be another briefing to say case closed. No charges.

Two things accomplished:
Clinton Inc out of the news before the election
Trump kills his "FBI is corrupt" rhetoric before he loses

a reply to: Xcathdra

Thanks, that is what I suspected, standard deflection.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Irishhaf

She asked Comey to release what he has to the public and only took 2 or 3 questions at her huuuge Press Conference...because she doesn't yet know what it is she'll need to lie about.

EXACTLY.

originally posted by: JacKatMtn



It would have to have been something substantial for Comey to do this now...

Why would it have to be something substantial? It may be, it may not be. The reason Comey is announcing it now is probably because if he waited until after the election to announce it, it would be career suicide on his part - especially if it did turn out to be significant. If it isn't significant (my guess is it probably isn't), he's off the hook because he warned that it might not be significant, and no one can say he withheld it before the election. It's a win/win for him to go ahead and disclose now that there are new emails that need to be reviewed.

originally posted by: kazanoom
It was never technically closed in the first place. Read the letter: “investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails.” The press and republicans started the "reopened" stuff.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: UKTruth
The emails they have are to and from Huma Abedin. There is no news yet on whether any of these communications involved Hillary Clinton. I suspect they do given how close she is to Hillary. Let's see what they were talking about.

If you had bothered to read what I posted from the AP earlier instead of trying to be a donkey about the Huffington Post, you would have known that.

Keep it Klassy, UK.

Now now. It's not my fault Hillary is under pressure and the investigation is reopened into her conduct.

In today's letter, Comey said:

In previous congressional testimony, I referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had completed its investigation of former Secretary Clinton's personal email server.

That sounds like the considered it case closed.

Now he said they have new information that has changed the situation. That sounds like reopened to me.

www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: kaylaluv

Because the threshold require to reopen an investigation is high. The new evidence / info would need to be significant enough that it could change a no prosecution decision to a prosecutable one. The thousand of emails are ones not seen by the FBI.

a reply to: imwilliam

Agreed.
If Comey were approaching the investigation as a political partisan, he would have filed charges back in July.

originally posted by: burntheships
Hillary 3 minutes, 3 questions.

She is very unnerved ....

Wow, is she ever a disgusting piece of work acting like she can order the FBI around while being criminally investigated.

I don't trust the media. There's a thing called selective honesty

Possibilities -

* - Classified information was found.
* - Evidence that Huma was providing information to the Saudis / Muslim Brotherhood (previous links established).
* - Evidence she disclosed classified info to Weiner.
* - Evidence Weiner provided classified info to others obtained by Huma.
* - Emails that undermine sworn testimony.
* - Emails that show a concerted effort to mislead / lie to cover up crimes.
* - Emails that contradict immunity agreement criteria.

All it takes is one charge that will stick to bring down the whole rotten mess. If one person flips to save themselves it can be deadly to the Clinton empire.

a reply to: kaylaluv

Hey Kaylaluv,

The reason Comey is announcing it now is probably because if he waited until after the election to announce it, it would be career suicide on his part - especially if it did turn out to be significant. If it isn't significant (my guess is it probably isn't), he's off the hook because he warned that it might not be significant, and no one can say he withheld it before the election. It's a win/win for him to go ahead and disclose now that there are new emails that need to be reviewed.

a reply to: kaylaluv

You don't see this as career suicide if Hillary wins? How is it "win win" for him if it turns out that the information isn't pertinent/signifigant and he drops this bomb so close to the election?

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: burntheships
Hillary 3 minutes, 3 questions.

She is very unnerved ....

Wow, is she ever a disgusting piece of work acting like she can order the FBI around while being criminally investigated.

You know, this type of thing has gone unnoticed for a very long time.

Didn't Huma get immunity?

originally posted by: Xcathdra
Possibilities -

* - Classified information was found.
* - Evidence that Huma was providing information to the Saudis / Muslim Brotherhood (previous links established).
* - Emails that undermine sworn testimony.
* - Emails that show a concerted effort to mislead / lie to cover up crimes.
* - Emails that contradict immunity agreement criteria.

All it takes is one charge that will stick to bring down the whole rotten mess. If one person flips to save themselves it can be deadly to the Clinton empire.

What happened to the certainty that Comey had been turned and the investigation had gone sideways?

That wasn't even a QUESTION as late as yesterday.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
Possibilities -

* - Classified information was found.
* - Evidence that Huma was providing information to the Saudis / Muslim Brotherhood (previous links established).
* - Emails that undermine sworn testimony.
* - Emails that show a concerted effort to mislead / lie to cover up crimes.
* - Emails that contradict immunity agreement criteria.

All it takes is one charge that will stick to bring down the whole rotten mess. If one person flips to save themselves it can be deadly to the Clinton empire.

Good summary of the possibilities!

I'm not so sure about someone flipping. I think everyone who has anything on her in this case has been given some kind of immunity deal. They won't need someone to flip though, if they have written evidence in emails.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Then why would he put it in writing that he didn't know yet if they were significant or not? If he knows right now that they are in fact significant, he would not be including that caveat. The fact is, they don't know if they are significant until they look at them in more detail.

originally posted by: avgguy
Didn't Huma get immunity?

yup...

However immunity is contingent upon the person telling the truth. If the person lies / omits info / hides info etc its a violation of the immunity agreement and can result in immunity being removed and the person prosecuted.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Well multiple media outlets are reporting the same thing for the most part so I think the sources know whats going on.

Yeah, I am just not comfortable accepting the word of 'unnamed sources' without some corroboration. These major media outlets pick up each other's stories. That doesn't mean they are all getting the same info from the same unnamed sources, and it doesn't mean the sources are reliable.

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Xcathdra

Then why would he put it in writing that he didn't know yet if they were significant or not? If he knows right now that they are in fact significant, he would not be including that caveat. The fact is, they don't know if they are significant until they look at them in more detail.

Because he is under no legal obligation to disclose evidence / info in a criminal investigation.