It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

BREAKING: Clinton Email Case Just Reopened!

page: 180
285
<< 177  178  179    181  182  183 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 07:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen



I didn't say there were no facts to Clinton's emails.

But, as of yet - - - no criminal charges.

I do say this is the same technique to discredit - - - as the Swift Boaters used for Kerry. Those accusations were manufactured.



The accusations against Kerry were manufactured. The accusations against Hillary Clinton mishandling classified information are real.

Same techniques you say.... once with false information and one with true information.
edit on R082016-11-02T19:08:41-05:00k0811Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 07:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen



I didn't say there were no facts to Clinton's emails.

But, as of yet - - - no criminal charges.

I do say this is the same technique to discredit - - - as the Swift Boaters used for Kerry. Those accusations were manufactured.



Absolutely true.

But wait & see....and it won't be long.

And it won't be just Hillary.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 07:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: SudoNim
178 pages in, still nothing but conjecture, rumour and fake sources and nothing of any substance.

It's getting a bit late for anything to actually affect Clinton, desperate times.


Just like there was nothing on Kerry by the Swift Boaters.

Turned out it was all lies.

www.youtube.com...



I didn't say there were no facts to Clinton's emails.

But, as of yet - - - no criminal charges.

I do say this is the same technique to discredit - - - as the Swift Boaters used for Kerry. Those accusations were manufactured.



The entire mess is completely the fault of Hillary Clinton.
Not only her initial decision to use a private server, but her lies after the event.



Maybe, maybe not. I don't know yet. I'll wait til all the Hoopla dies down. (took me 10 years to see the Exorcist, so I wouldn't be influenced by over Hype).

I bet there's many politicians scrambling now to secure their servers.

I do know Internet laws have and are being enacted - - AFTER THE FACT. Because the Internet took off so rapidly, few were prepared.

Hard lessons learned can often be the best teacher.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 07:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Riffrafter

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen



I didn't say there were no facts to Clinton's emails.

But, as of yet - - - no criminal charges.

I do say this is the same technique to discredit - - - as the Swift Boaters used for Kerry. Those accusations were manufactured.



Absolutely true.

But wait & see....and it won't be long.

And it won't be just Hillary.



And it won't be just Hillary.

There you go. Absolutely!

I just lived too long to fall for "over hype". I'm more of a pragmatic prove it to me.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 07:24 PM
link   
What I don't understand is where were all these relentless investigations after 9/11? And I don't mean softball talks where Bush and Cheney sit in the same room together. Where was this AWESOME intense investigative FIRE after 9/11? Talk about a national security SNAFU... close to 3000 people dead, World Trade Center Towers, building 7, Pentagon, and of course the economic impact. We could have really used these AMAZING die hard Republican badasses back then.... I mean, emails... There's nothing there! But 9/11... there was so much! You would think the people who cared about 4 people dead in Benghazi would have had a lot more to say after 9/11 and 3000 dead.

Just doesn't make sense, does it? I really try to understand what the difference is between then and now... It's almost like there's a hypocritical element.... and this is all just a partisan witch hunt. And like they don't even really care about Benghazi or dead people or even national security... but... just... stopping... Hillary?

Someone help me understand how 9/11, slid down the Republican gullet so easy, earned a second term for Bush... but emails with no fire is cause for relentless investigation?



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 07:28 PM
link   
a reply to: spiritualzombie

You actually have to think about all that?




posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 07:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
What I don't understand is where were all these relentless investigations after 9/11? And I don't mean softball talks where Bush and Cheney sit in the same room together. Where was this AWESOME intense investigative FIRE after 9/11? Talk about a national security SNAFU... close to 3000 people dead, World Trade Center Towers, building 7, Pentagon, and of course the economic impact. We could have really used these AMAZING die hard Republican badasses back then.... I mean, emails... There's nothing there! But 9/11... there was so much! You would think the people who cared about 4 people dead in Benghazi would have had a lot more to say after 9/11 and 3000 dead.

Just doesn't make sense, does it? I really try to understand what the difference is between then and now... It's almost like there's a hypocritical element.... and this is all just a partisan witch hunt. And like they don't even really care about Benghazi or dead people or even national security... but... just... stopping... Hillary?

Someone help me understand how 9/11, slid down the Republican gullet so easy, earned a second term for Bush... but emails with no fire is cause for relentless investigation?





Yeah, the FBI is just twiddling their thumbs at their desks right now laughing at us. We will find out, but I doubt the FBI would risk the credibility loss in reopening this case for no reason.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 07:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: spiritualzombie

You actually have to think about all that?



Yeah... I'm really trying hard to figure it out. I mean don't you agree? 9/11 is the most epic huge failure in judgment and epic huge failure in national security. I mean there's so much there... and a HUGE body count. So much impact! But where was the outrage from all these patriotic Republicans? These badasses that never stop-- always in search of the truth. Where were the relentless investigations? Where was the badass truth seeker FOX during all that? After all those failures how did those badass Republicans allow Bush a second term???? They must have been FURIOUS!

I try hard to figure out the difference. Because emails with no fire seems very small potatoes in comparison--- but somehow that's what woke them all up? I just don't get it...
edit on 2-11-2016 by spiritualzombie because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 07:43 PM
link   
I like how everybody ignores the perjury part. Like that part is all right.

Never mind everything else, if you like, the perjury was actually recorded on video and is available 24/7 to anyone that wants to actually watch the Benghazi investigation.

Please, tell us more about how we need a president that lies under oath.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 07:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Riffrafter

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: xuenchen



I didn't say there were no facts to Clinton's emails.

But, as of yet - - - no criminal charges.

I do say this is the same technique to discredit - - - as the Swift Boaters used for Kerry. Those accusations were manufactured.



Absolutely true.

But wait & see....and it won't be long.

And it won't be just Hillary.



And it won't be just Hillary.

There you go. Absolutely!

I just lived too long to fall for "over hype". I'm more of a pragmatic prove it to me.


Prove what to you?

I don't need to prove anything to you. The facts and events will speak for themselves.

Is there something you didn't understand about my post?

What I said was wait and see....it won't be long....and it won't be just Hillary.

Time will tell if I'm correct in my beliefs.

Clearer now?



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 07:51 PM
link   
a reply to: spiritualzombie

But you realize all the recent government reports prove Hillary Clinton has lied dozens of times to the voters and to the Citizens right?

The Hillary Clinton Campaign has zero to do with the 9/11/2001 attacks.

The re-opening of the email scandal investigation is paramount.

I know even many Democrats are seeing Clinton as a proven liar and sociopath.




posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 07:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: spiritualzombie

But you realize all the recent government reports prove Hillary Clinton has lied dozens of times to the voters and to the Citizens right?

The Hillary Clinton Campaign has zero to do with the 9/11/2001 attacks.

The re-opening of the email scandal investigation is paramount.

I know even many Democrats are seeing Clinton as a proven liar and sociopath.



So help me out because I want to get onboard. Are you saying the reason 9/11 and the Bush admin never received this kind of INTENSE AWESOME RELENTLESS investigation by Republican badasses and the always hard hitting FOX News... is because Hillary wasn't involved??? Are you saying.... Republicans don't actually care about national security or body count or any of that.... They only care about stopping Hillary?



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 07:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: spiritualzombie

But you realize all the recent government reports prove Hillary Clinton has lied dozens of times to the voters and to the Citizens right?

The Hillary Clinton Campaign has zero to do with the 9/11/2001 attacks.

The re-opening of the email scandal investigation is paramount.

I know even many Democrats are seeing Clinton as a proven liar and sociopath.



The Young Turks came out and said so today, and even reported the for profit nature of the Clinton Foundation. A leftist talk show. Good for them!



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 08:13 PM
link   
Watching Megyn Kelly.

Is Hillary going to be indicted for Clinton Foundation?



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 08:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Watching Megyn Kelly.

Is Hillary going to be indicted for Clinton Foundation?


Sounds like it's likely

FBI Sources Tell Fox News "Likely an Indictment" In Clinton Foundation Case

Fox News Channel's Bret Baier reports the latest news about the Clinton Foundation investigation from two sources inside the FBI. He reveals five important new pieces of information in these two short clips:

1. The Clinton Foundation investigation is far more expansive than anybody has reported so far and has been going on for more than a year.

2. The laptops of Clinton aides Cherryl Mills and Heather Samuelson have not been destroyed, and agents are currently combing through them. The investigation has interviewed several people twice, and plans to interview some for a third time.

3. Agents have found emails believed to have originated on Hillary Clinton's secret server on Anthony Weiner's laptop. They say the emails are not duplicates and could potentially be classified in nature.

4. Sources within the FBI have told him that an indictment is "likely" in the case of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation, "barring some obstruction in some way" from the Justice Department.

5. FBI sources say with 99% accuracy that Hillary Clinton's server has been hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies, and that information had been taken from it.

Source:
www.realclearpolitics.com...

FOX News update video at link.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 08:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Watching Megyn Kelly.

Is Hillary going to be indicted for Clinton Foundation?


The Clinton Foundation was stared by former President William Jefferson Clinton.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 08:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Throes

Thank you!!!

Just to clarify, does Lynch have to be the one to determine an indictment?



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 08:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Throes

Here I am watching the world series and all these developments are happening...

I still assume when they say an indictment likely that one of her inner circle will take the fall (but I could be wrong)...



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 08:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: SonOfThor
a reply to: Throes

Here I am watching the world series and all these developments are happening...



Good Developments. GO CUBS!



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 08:25 PM
link   
a reply to: SonOfThor

Cubs v Indians in game 7?
fox will still be on in a couple hours.......



new topics

top topics



 
285
<< 177  178  179    181  182  183 >>

log in

join