It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

BREAKING: Clinton Email Case Just Reopened!

page: 159
284
<< 156  157  158    160  161  162 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 07:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: ColaTesla
The fix has already started, check out whos leading the DOJ investigation, This is all going to tun into another nothing burger

The fix is in





John Podesta's Best Friend At The DOJ Will Be In Charge Of The DOJ's Probe Into Huma Abedin Emails


Okay, the article headline tells you how this'll be swept under the carpet nice and neat, with no dirt on Comey.




posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 07:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: ColaTesla
The fix has already started, check out whos leading the DOJ investigation, This is all going to tun into another nothing burger

The fix is in





John Podesta's Best Friend At The DOJ Will Be In Charge Of The DOJ's Probe Into Huma Abedin Emails


Okay, the article headline tells you how this'll be swept under the carpet nice and neat, with no dirt on Comey.


Umm...should he recuse himself? Seems a tad unethical.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 07:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: IAMTAT
So JW turned up, via FOIA, work-related emails she never turned over?
Didn't she say she turned over all 'work-related' emails?



She lied again for the 10,000th time.



So you're telling me she is a liar? Shocking.



Nixon is a liar...

Clinton is beyond that...



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 07:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: ColaTesla
The fix has already started, check out whos leading the DOJ investigation, This is all going to tun into another nothing burger

The fix is in





John Podesta's Best Friend At The DOJ Will Be In Charge Of The DOJ's Probe Into Huma Abedin Emails


Okay, the article headline tells you how this'll be swept under the carpet nice and neat, with no dirt on Comey.


Except for the fact the NYPD knows whats on the laptop since they are the ones who found the info and contacted the FBI.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 07:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: IAMTAT
So JW turned up, via FOIA, work-related emails she never turned over?
Didn't she say she turned over all 'work-related' emails?



She lied again for the 10,000th time.



So you're telling me she is a liar? Shocking.



Nixon is a liar...

Clinton is beyond that...


Compared to Hillary...Nixon was Mother Teresa.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 07:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: ColaTesla
The fix has already started, check out whos leading the DOJ investigation, This is all going to tun into another nothing burger

The fix is in





John Podesta's Best Friend At The DOJ Will Be In Charge Of The DOJ's Probe Into Huma Abedin Emails


Okay, the article headline tells you how this'll be swept under the carpet nice and neat, with no dirt on Comey.


Umm...should he recuse himself? Seems a tad unethical.


Can anything exist in Washington that IS ETHICAL!? Seems not! Just more smoke and mirrors and the fake theatre of going through the legal motions with a predetermined result of innocent.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 07:28 PM
link   
Speculation Alert --

Going with the supposed trail of events: first Weiner gets caught giving underage girl naughty photos. The NYPD arrest him and get the electronic device that has the emails. The NYPD finds the emails and somehow the FBI finds out about the device. The FBI does not "notify" their director for approximately three weeks. This begs some questions:

1) Did anyone in the NYPD make copies of the email. Remember that the police have been hit hard with police brutality charges. Clinton's campaign had Black LIves Matter mothers at the DN convention. If you were in the NYPD would you like a little insurance file to help keep things under wraps? Would you distribute copies to other LEOs for their protection from DOJ and other organizations? Ye never know!

2) If the "grunts" of the FBI had their hands on the device for three weeks; what are the chances that copies have been made by FBI agents? They might want to have some "insurance" against the TPTB.

3) You have to know that if Huma kept this insurance file; the rest of the Clinton staff have their own copies too. It is their lifeline if they get into trouble.

If you the puppet master is worth it now to risk information getting out at a much more critical time? Is it time to throw people under the bus and wait for the heat to turn down?

Just speculating.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 07:31 PM
link   
Many pages ago, JAckKtMtn linked a really neat MIT thingy, I spent a little time playing around with it and came up with these images:



This is a graphic mapping of all the emails in the Wikileaks database for Hillary's section. Each node/person is a circle. The different colors are clusters of nodes that are more related to one another.

Note that there are a relatively few large nodes surrounded by a group of networks of smaller nodes which is surrounded out further still by a cloud of individual nodes. The size of the node is dependent upon the amount of email traffic for each person.

This is what happens when you click on a particular circle, in this case, Huma:



If you click on a node, you then get that particular person's direct linkages and then those are also enhanced by the thickness of the line connecting one node to another, the thicker the line, the more communication between those nodes.

Clinton Network Node MIT mapping thingy

Here's Podesta's



Much more complex. There are several clusters of nodes and some of them are connected to the central nodes, but some are not.

This is the largest node in Podesta's cluster:



Podesta' MIT mapping thingy

And this is the DNC network:



The largest node centered:



DNC MIT link

There are sliders where you can change the charge (how attracted each node is to another), # of nodes, and # of connections; all the full maps in this post are made with nodes and links maxed and charge set around medium.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 07:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: IAMTAT
So JW turned up, via FOIA, work-related emails she never turned over?
Didn't she say she turned over all 'work-related' emails?



She lied again for the 10,000th time.



So you're telling me she is a liar? Shocking.



Nixon is a liar...

Clinton is beyond that...


Compared to Hillary...Nixon was Mother Teresa.


Really? 25 people went to jail because of Nixon.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 07:40 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

You know, they never intended to delete government emails, it was merely a careless mistake. And they simply forgot the fact when they swore under oath that these emails ever even existed.

Sure you can't mean that they would be held to the oath that was signed when they received their clearances, right?

The one's who had clearances anyway, because it certainly seems that quite a few people without a clearance had access to information that was not supposed to be viewed unless one possessed a clearance oneself, and even with a clearance, one might not have the proper level of clearance and/or even need-to-know; and we know that some of what was present was SAP/SCI.

But it's ok, because they never meant to be so careless with it.

(f)



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 07:42 PM
link   
a reply to: feldercarb

News I've read said McCabe, FBI #2 man whose wife got nearly $500000 from McAullif sat on info from NY FBI office.

Speculate on that....... I say tried run clock out and failed due patriotic agents who went around blockage straight to Comey.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 07:43 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Great work, J&C...had a feeling you'd dig into that.

Any early general conclusions based upon groupings?



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 07:53 PM
link   
Didn't want to start another thread right now...but this breaking news just out on FOX:


Clinton aide left classified info behind on 2010 China trip

www.foxnews.com...

Didn't the same thing happen in Russia?
Can't help but wonder if the 'unnamed Clinton aide' was Huma girl.
I wonder also, if it is Huma, this is an intentional leak to smear her and portray her as an incompetent.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 08:03 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Looking at the Hillary network, her organization has a much more centralized concentration of important members as noted by the relatively few large nodes in the center surrounded by successive clouds of individual nodes.

Jake Sullivan, Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, are the three largest nodes. They handled more of the electronic communications than anyone else. There are a couple nearly as large as Huma's node, but these are the three heavyweights in Clinton's section.

The Huma centered map shows a good amount of communicaiton between Huma and "lona," Mills, Jake, and Jennifer; Jennifer's node is one of the one's nearly equal to Huma.

Podesta's network is by far the most complex of the three, DNC get's second in that regard, and Hillary's is the simplest.

Podesta's larger number of clusters suggests a much greater degree of compartmentalization. The complexity of the structure also indicates a high number of cross connections, which would be necessary in a highly compartmentalized operation.

Here is one thing to guard against, the size of the node does not necessarily indicate the importance of the node. For example, if you look at Podesta global map, you can clearly see peterkadzik, which we know from another thread, is a good friend of Podesta and in charge of investigating the new emails recently discovered but is a smallish node.

And Donna Brazile's node in the DNC map is not all that large.

The DNC seems to be bifurcated into two main sections with one having a greater deal of complexity than the other. Not being as familiar with the names in the DNC ops, I wouldn't want to hazard much other than mirandal gets a CRAPTON of email traffic, much more than anyone else in the DNC map.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 08:11 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Impressive analysis...as always.

'Miranda L.' ...Do we know who this is?



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 08:12 PM
link   
Luis Miranda...DNC Communications Dir.

www.theatlantic.com...



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 08:20 PM
link   
Why are we even looking at this any more?

Clinton's got Kadzik in her (rather sizable) back pocket. She's bullet proof.

I really thought this was the end for her until I read about him in Xuenchen's thread.

So disheartening.



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 08:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Luis Miranda...DNC Communications Dir.

www.theatlantic.com...


Which would explain why he has the largest node there and the huge number of connections.

Actually, going back and looking, Donna Brazile has two different email addresses in this listing, neither of which mailed to the other:


donnabrazile@me.com
and
donna@brazileassociates.com


Both did mail to mirandal and paustenbachm though.

 


a reply to: TomLawless

whistling past the graveyard?
edit on 31-10-2016 by jadedANDcynical because: more



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 08:31 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

One would be Brazile's DNC address...the other for her consulting.

Mark Paustenbach
DNC National Press Secretary
www.zoominfo.com...



posted on Oct, 31 2016 @ 08:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: IAMTAT
So JW turned up, via FOIA, work-related emails she never turned over?
Didn't she say she turned over all 'work-related' emails?



She lied again for the 10,000th time.



So you're telling me she is a liar? Shocking.



Nixon is a liar...

Clinton is beyond that...


Compared to Hillary...Nixon was Mother Teresa.


Really? 25 people went to jail because of Nixon.


and a 144 fled the country when Hillary was fined for FEC violations during her Senate run.



new topics

top topics



 
284
<< 156  157  158    160  161  162 >>

log in

join