It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Gryphon66
Officials had to await a court order to begin reviewing the emails—which they received over the weekend, according to a person familiar with the matter—because they were uncovered in an unrelated probe of Mr. Weiner.
and
The FBI had searched the computer while looking for child pornography, people familiar with the matter said, but the warrant they used didn’t give them authority to search for matters related to Mrs. Clinton’s email arrangement at the State Department. Mr. Weiner has denied sending explicit or indecent messages to the minor.
from:
www.wsj.com...
To me this seems like they want to go by the book when acquiring (if any) evidence.
Thanks for the advice. I imagine that most of my posts won't be an issue soon.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: JacKatMtn
The only thing I'm doing here is to keep going back to the FACTS of this matter, and that is, plainly, as I have linked, referenced, quoted, etc. NUMEROUS times ... the content and significance of these emails of interest IS NOT KNOWN.
Who and what was the investigation opened about originally? These are facts that are readily available online everywhere.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: JacKatMtn
The only thing I'm doing here is to keep going back to the FACTS of this matter, and that is, plainly, as I have linked, referenced, quoted, etc. NUMEROUS times ... the content and significance of these emails of interest IS NOT KNOWN.
Who and what was the investigation opened about originally? These are facts that are readily available online everywhere.
The investigation of the CLinton Email Server?
As I remember it was a request from a couple of IGs ... one from State and one from the Intelligence Community.
Is that what you're going for? Do I need to look that up for you too?
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: JacKatMtn
The only thing I'm doing here is to keep going back to the FACTS of this matter, and that is, plainly, as I have linked, referenced, quoted, etc. NUMEROUS times ... the content and significance of these emails of interest IS NOT KNOWN.
Who and what was the investigation opened about originally? These are facts that are readily available online everywhere.
The investigation of the CLinton Email Server?
As I remember it was a request from a couple of IGs ... one from State and one from the Intelligence Community.
Is that what you're going for? Do I need to look that up for you too?
No need...I know the answer...just trying to ascertain if you do.
So...who was investigated?
originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: Gryphon66
I agree .. we do not know....
However, will you honestly admit that this is devastating to Hillarys Campaign and possibly the end of it all IF it turns out to have a lot of previously unseen work related Clinton emails?
The only point I agree with you on is that there was a insufficient amount of information on a subject of such great importance.
I think a lot more will be laid bare in the coming days in the form of more and more leaks, which some will deny until the day of the resignation of Hillary Clinton.
originally posted by: RickinVa
One point the Hillary defenders can not overcome.
Peoples opinions about Hillarys integrity, honesty are about 5 feet from the bottom already.
In a few days... she will be at rock bottom in the honesty department. Maybe even in the basement by that point.
Days before the election.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: JacKatMtn
The only thing I'm doing here is to keep going back to the FACTS of this matter, and that is, plainly, as I have linked, referenced, quoted, etc. NUMEROUS times ... the content and significance of these emails of interest IS NOT KNOWN.
Who and what was the investigation opened about originally? These are facts that are readily available online everywhere.
The investigation of the CLinton Email Server?
As I remember it was a request from a couple of IGs ... one from State and one from the Intelligence Community.
Is that what you're going for? Do I need to look that up for you too?
No need...I know the answer...just trying to ascertain if you do.
So...who was investigated?
Several people associated with the use of the server, as I understand it.
The FBI Director, however, has been quite careful to state that the investigation was of the server and of the emails (the contents of the server).
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: Gryphon66
I agree .. we do not know....
However, will you honestly admit that this is devastating to Hillarys Campaign and possibly the end of it all IF it turns out to have a lot of previously unseen work related Clinton emails?
The only point I agree with you on is that there was a insufficient amount of information on a subject of such great importance.
I think a lot more will be laid bare in the coming days in the form of more and more leaks, which some will deny until the day of the resignation of Hillary Clinton.
IF these emails are the ones so many hope they are, the final nail in the coffin on the question of Hillary Clinton's intent to distribute and/or grossly mishandle classified info, then yes, I can see that. I would argue, as I imagine the DOJ did, that the investigation of the emails should happen FIRST and the results (when there actually ARE results) should be revealed.
If there is treason involved or some other high crime, appropriate actions can be taken WHEN THAT IS PROVEN.
Instead, what we have is the reaction that so many here in this very thread have had to the mere fact of Comey's letter.
Yes, the election has been affected by what can only be termed government interference.
That shouldn't make anyone happy.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Gryphon66
I see what your saying however from my (vague) knowledge of the law something sticks out. Just because they have the information legally doesn't mean it's admissible in court.
For instance, let's say there is classified information on the laptop owned by Weiner and Abadin. They have it but don't own it and certainly aren't classified to see it.
Once the FBI realized that they may infact need this for evidence in another case, they decided to get the warrant.
originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: Gryphon66
"Yes, the election has been affected by what can only be termed government interference."
But even you have to admit that you do not know the reason for that interference. Maybe the FBI felt they have something so compelling they felt the need to intervene prior to the election in an effort to be forthcoming with new evidence?
Everything is pure speculation at this point.... but going way way way out there on that branch all by yourself that this will turn out to be nothing to do with Clinton is a bit of a stretch.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: Gryphon66
"Yes, the election has been affected by what can only be termed government interference."
But even you have to admit that you do not know the reason for that interference. Maybe the FBI felt they have something so compelling they felt the need to intervene prior to the election in an effort to be forthcoming with new evidence?
Everything is pure speculation at this point.... but going way way way out there on that branch all by yourself that this will turn out to be nothing to do with Clinton is a bit of a stretch.
I haven't claimed any knowledge, I have only pointed out that none of us have the knowledge that so many posts here are assuming.
I feel like that's my duty to the truth.
/shrug
Government Positions
White House Office Includes multiple levels of presidential advisory boards and...
deputy counsel (?→'99)
Department of State First U.S. federal agency
counselor and chief of staff to the Secretary ('09→)
Clinton Administration Transition Team
Deputy General Counsel (past)
Government Positions
Office of the Secretary of State The U.S. Secretary of State and direct staff
Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations (Jan '09→)
Business Positions
Teneo Holdings Consultancy founded in 2011 by Declan Kelly, Doug Band and Paul...
Consultant
Other Positions & Memberships
Clinton Foundation Now known as the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation
Consultant
Hillary for America Hillary Clinton's 2016 POTUS Campaign Committee
Vice Chair
originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: Gryphon66
"Yes, the election has been affected by what can only be termed government interference."
But even you have to admit that you do not know the reason for that interference. Maybe the FBI felt they have something so compelling they felt the need to intervene prior to the election in an effort to be forthcoming with new evidence?
Everything is pure speculation at this point.... but going way way way out there on that branch all by yourself that this will turn out to be nothing to do with Clinton is a bit of a stretch.
I haven't claimed any knowledge, I have only pointed out that none of us have the knowledge that so many posts here are assuming.
I feel like that's my duty to the truth.
/shrug
You know what... you are on the wrong website. This is ATS.. a conspiracy website.
We have the FBI, Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner in the cross hairs of a renewed FBI investigation.
Pretty sure that makes it a conspiracy and ripe for discussion. You my friend are trying to play the Lone Ranger to keep people from discussing a conspiracy on a freaking conspiracy website and it is not working out very well for your credibility at all.