BREAKING: Clinton Email Case Just Reopened!

a reply to: Gryphon66
He was impeached, he was then aquitted. The impeachment is the trail. You can't be aquitted unless you are charged and go to trial. The trail of a sitting president is called an Impeachment.

a reply to: Gryphon66

bs
the dems had all the power when barak got elected
they pused through obama care
if they wanted to investigate bush they would have
so dem majority congress and senate had no problem with a corrupt bush admin

a reply to: imjack

Explain the nature of the leak of 33,000 emails without hacking.

The FBI release them. Many of them were redacted because of the confidential nature.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: ab0vean0n
a reply to: imjack

Her server was located at her house, on her personal internet connection / network, on an non-encrypted server. None of the files were encrypted, and most likely didn't use an encrypted email protocol.

It was a total lack of security.

As opposed to the servers at State and Defense that have been repeatedly hacked by anyone, anywhere who wants to?

Yeah, it's a concern about SECURITY. Sure.

The government servers are where the classified info belongs.
Clintons private server is not.

Trying to make a distinction is a deflection.

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: ab0vean0n
a reply to: imjack

Her server was located at her house, on her personal internet connection / network, on an non-encrypted server. None of the files were encrypted, and most likely didn't use an encrypted email protocol.

It was a total lack of security.

As opposed to the servers at State and Defense that have been repeatedly hacked by anyone, anywhere who wants to?

Yeah, it's a concern about SECURITY. Sure.

The government servers are where the classified info belongs.
Clintons private server is not.

Trying to make a distinction is a deflection.

If the question is SECURITY it's not a deflection.

That was the post I responded to ... notably, it wasn't yours. Perhaps you didn't quite understand their point.

a reply to: imjack
Did you read the link I sent?

Emails sent to Clinton's private clintonemail.com address were first discovered in March 2013, when a hacker named "Guccifer" widely distributed emails sent to Clinton from Sidney Blumenthal, which Guccifer obtained by illegally accessing Blumenthal's email account.

Some of her personal email were released via a hack of Blumenthal. Not of Hillarys email server.

a reply to: Xcathdra

You can't answer a single post without a leading deflecting question.
So you're saying none of Clinton's personal emails were even released?
If you disagree with that, explain the nature of Clinton's leaked emails.

According to documents in the FBI vault, one other very big problem
for Hillary Clinton, and her use of a private email server.

[email protected]

This is proof that The Clintons allowed Huma Abedin access to
an illegal server, in which she forwarded emails to herself,
so that she could print them.

Hillary Clinton an accomplice to espionage?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66

bs
the dems had all the power when barak got elected
they pused through obama care
if they wanted to investigate bush they would have
so dem majority congress and senate had no problem with a corrupt bush admin

Again, not the point.

Do you have a problem with a corrupt Bush adminstration?

Do you have a problem with the fact that he and his Cabinet broke multiple laws?

If corruption and broken laws are the real issues with CLinton ... why is the question of the Bush White House always brushed aside?

Answer, its not about corruption or security or the law .. it's about partisanship. Pure and simple.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Yeah you have no clue what you are talking about. You cant refute facts so you fall back to the democrat standard of attacking the person to deflect.

If you could defend Clinton you would. Instead you are doing everything but that.

originally posted by: imjack

originally posted by: ab0vean0n
a reply to: imjack

Her server was located at her house, on her personal internet connection / network, on an non-encrypted server. None of the files were encrypted, and most likely didn't use an encrypted email protocol.

It was a total lack of security.

a reply to: Xcathdra

a reply to: ab0vean0n

So you're both saying none of Clinton's personal emails were even released?

Mostly not. They deleted those they "considered" to be personal, then bleachbit the server.

The ones that have been released have usually come from sources other than servers, such as those retrieved from the devices or accounts of those she communicated with.

There has been discussion that there could be backups that still exist and have not yet been revealed.

And now - its possible some of them might have been in the possession of Huma, so those might be now released.

That is enough.

Thread closed for now since people just can't seem to behave.

originally posted by: Blaine91555
ATTENTION:

This is not the Mud Pit and posts are getting way to aggressive and personal. Please if you can't discuss this is a civil manner move on before a Posting Ban is necessary to stop this!

Do not reply to this message.

In case it was missed.

Let us be perfectly CLEAR:

This thread is NOT IN THE MUD PIT.

We do not know how much clearer we can be about that.

That means the normal Terms and Conditions apply here.

Insults - Unacceptable

Calling members idiots - Unacceptable

Calling members liars - Unacceptable

Questioning members mental health - Unacceptable

Calling member shills or paid disinfo agents, Hillary bots, Trump bots, etc, etc, etc - UNACCEPTABLE!!!!!

We expect CIVIL discussion and a higher level of DECORUM in the forums OUTSIDE OF THE MUD PIT.

IF you can not understand that: do not post in this thread.
IF you can not accept that: do not post in this thread.
IF you can not resist to resorting to the immature behavior listed above: DO NOT POST IN THIS THREAD!

Talking about each other is considered OFF TOPIC. Discuss the topic of the thread, not each other.

We are tired of dealing with those that just can not seem to follow the rules here. If you can't follow the rules, then you do not need to be posting. Period!

You have been warned.

Thread reopened.

Do NOT reply to this post, unless you feel like being post banned.

Came across this earlier and worth sharing.

The FBI is ready to indict Hillary Clinton and if its recommendation isn’t followed by the U.S. attorney general, the agency’s investigators plan to blow the whistle and go public with their findings, former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay tells Newsmax TV.

“I have friends that are in the FBI and they tell me they’re ready to indict,” DeLay said Monday on “The Steve Malzberg Show.”

“They’re ready to recommend an indictment and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they’re going public.”

I'm sure if a hammer is coming down we'll know by Monday.


Read more: www.thepoliticalinsider.com...

I think that RNC co-chair Sharon day has said it best about Hillary Clinton. "She has swindled the American people". This is true on a literal level, wasting tax payers money spending time enriching herself, and true on a moral level where she has lied for nearly 2 years about her actions. Covering it all up and finally being forced to give a weak apology once it was clear she was caught.

The effort she has expended lying and trying to subvert the investigation is, I believe, indicative of how she will run the country. I sincerely hope there is something in this batch of new emails that proves her intent to the satisfaction of the law, otherwise the country (and the world) are in for another 4-8 years of scandal.

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
Came across this earlier and worth sharing.

The FBI is ready to indict Hillary Clinton and if its recommendation isn’t followed by the U.S. attorney general, the agency’s investigators plan to blow the whistle and go public with their findings, former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay tells Newsmax TV.

“I have friends that are in the FBI and they tell me they’re ready to indict,” DeLay said Monday on “The Steve Malzberg Show.”

“They’re ready to recommend an indictment and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they’re going public.”

I'm sure if a hammer is coming down we'll know by Monday.


Read more: www.thepoliticalinsider.com...

If true, this is good news... for all mankind.

a reply to: Rosinitiate

Umm, I think this is old. Like from January.

So everyone outside the echo chamber agrees that this has been overblown..and the investigation has not been reopened and that the emails are probably not even from Hillary.

When faced with facts, some will turn the crazyness level up to 11, along with rampant speculation and wild conspriacy theories.