It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Mousygretchen
a reply to: trollz
Not to mention, the possibility that she is using low self esteem as an excuse.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Assassin82
There are two main types of exclusivity to a relationship, unless one happens to be in one of these new fangled open arrangements of course, but for the purposes of this discussion, lets dispense with that facet for now.
The two main types of exclusivity in a romantic relationship, are physical exclusivity, whereby a person swears that access to their physical person is restricted to all but their partner, in the intimate and sexual sense. Essentially ones erogenous zones and amorous contact is limited to the singular individual one is in the relationship with.
The next type of exclusivity, is emotional exclusivity, whereby the partners in the relationship are under an obligation to restrict themselves to desiring emotional intimacy only with their counterpart in the relationship, and do not share the same emotional connection with anyone else. For example, there should only be one person that a relationship partner says "I love you" to in a romantic sense.
Now, the difficulties here as I see them, are that although it does not seem as if either emotional or physical exclusivity have been violated at this point, the nature of the situation your partner is facing is of a sort which complicates things rather a lot. Three letter agency...with respect, there are quite a few of them, and not all of them have structure of the sort which makes establishing personal boundaries in the work place difficult. CIA? Sure, that's a tough one, because there is an awful lot of ladder work in that organisation, those higher up being CONSIDERABLY less likely to be slapped down a peg by the management for bad behaviour, than those further down. This makes reporting and dealing with work place impropriety difficult for a person under pressure.
But in the EPA or DEA? Not so much.
Unless your partner is in an agency which deals directly with national security, her concerns and yours should be dealt with by pushing the matter up the chain and having the fellow dealt with through that method, not by pussyfooting around on your significant others part, and allowing the impropriety to continue.
If she is in an agency which deals with national security, then very often the individual segments of those organisations are laws unto themselves, as are the psychopathic, evil minded bags of pus who ordinarily gravitate toward those agencies, the promise of power and invisibility drawing them in like moths to flame. Getting things the way you want them in those agencies is very difficult.
In short, there appears to have been no break down in exclusivity, and until there has been such a breakdown, I would err on the side of supporting your woman through this issue, rather than making it all about you, though I fully understand your concerns about it.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Assassin82
There are two main types of exclusivity to a relationship, unless one happens to be in one of these new fangled open arrangements of course, but for the purposes of this discussion, lets dispense with that facet for now.
The two main types of exclusivity in a romantic relationship, are physical exclusivity, whereby a person swears that access to their physical person is restricted to all but their partner, in the intimate and sexual sense. Essentially ones erogenous zones and amorous contact is limited to the singular individual one is in the relationship with.
The next type of exclusivity, is emotional exclusivity, whereby the partners in the relationship are under an obligation to restrict themselves to desiring emotional intimacy only with their counterpart in the relationship, and do not share the same emotional connection with anyone else. For example, there should only be one person that a relationship partner says "I love you" to in a romantic sense.
Now, the difficulties here as I see them, are that although it does not seem as if either emotional or physical exclusivity have been violated at this point, the nature of the situation your partner is facing is of a sort which complicates things rather a lot. Three letter agency...with respect, there are quite a few of them, and not all of them have structure of the sort which makes establishing personal boundaries in the work place difficult. CIA? Sure, that's a tough one, because there is an awful lot of ladder work in that organisation, those higher up being CONSIDERABLY less likely to be slapped down a peg by the management for bad behaviour, than those further down. This makes reporting and dealing with work place impropriety difficult for a person under pressure.
But in the EPA or DEA? Not so much.
Unless your partner is in an agency which deals directly with national security, her concerns and yours should be dealt with by pushing the matter up the chain and having the fellow dealt with through that method, not by pussyfooting around on your significant others part, and allowing the impropriety to continue.
If she is in an agency which deals with national security, then very often the individual segments of those organisations are laws unto themselves, as are the psychopathic, evil minded bags of pus who ordinarily gravitate toward those agencies, the promise of power and invisibility drawing them in like moths to flame. Getting things the way you want them in those agencies is very difficult.
In short, there appears to have been no break down in exclusivity, and until there has been such a breakdown, I would err on the side of supporting your woman through this issue, rather than making it all about you, though I fully understand your concerns about it.
originally posted by: JinMI
Absolutely not.
Support your partner and go after the problem (the boss). Nail his scummy arse to a wall. No reason this dbag should come between you and your soon to be spouse. She clearly bent around his whims to keep herself gainfully employed. She was sent some crap and denied none of it.
Lets say you signed up for a purchase offer or a survey or some other random internet thing that required your email address. Then they sold your address to some other company that in turn sent you an offer to a porn site? Is that cheating?
Quick tip. You being her fiancé is her biggest help to her self esteem.
I was searching for an email we sent to a vendor when I found an email she sent to her boss. The email was part of a "homework assignment" he gave her. It included a link to a pornsite with a video of a Boss/Secretary scenario. It was personal. It was done with intent. I consider it cheating.
She claims that because of his high rank, she couldn't turn him in for harassment, she couldn't ask him to stop, and she didn't know what else to do but play along in his fantasy.
originally posted by: tetra50
I just had to repost this response, cause I find it so succinct and relevant. Especially the last part I bolded.
Her boss makes uninvited moves on her, and somehow she needs a life coach and lacks self esteem? Her boss is a friggin predator taking advantage of his position, and her lack of position, seniority and frankly, that's she's a young, beautiful woman......
Maybe it's just me. I'm a woman, used to be somewhat attractive when I was younger. When all this stuff started coming out about Trump, a powerful, wealthy mover and shaker, and his behavior with women, I didn't doubt it for a second. I could easily see all that happening, and not because I dislike Trump or anything. But because when I was a certain age, the same kinds of things happened to me with bosses, or men in positions of power and influence greater than mine. I don't think that's rare at all for women, in general, to experience. Recently, in fact, someone I repeatedly rebuffed advances from physically by moving their hand away from my body, literally, then began to show me porn on his cell phone he claimed he couldn't get off his cell, and would I help him get it off. Obviously, the goal there was thinking he could get me turned on somehow by watching this crap on his phone while ostensibly trying to "help" him get rid of it.....LOL Absolutely ridiculous.
She hasn't lied to you. The fact she was even honest that she might have secretly and slightly enjoyed that attention from a powerful man is huge, imho. She's facing the realities, and her reality as a woman in that particular career field, as you describe, is quite different than anything you'll ever have to deal with.
She doesn't need a life coach for her self esteem. She needs affirmation from the man she loves that he has faith in her and understands her situation, and appreciates her honesty. That's why she'll continue to be honest with you. Otherwise, there will just be resentment for your lack of understanding, and succumbing to climbing the career ladder in other ways than talent and hard work, and looking for someone who appreciates you in every possible way will overtake your relationship. I think you'd know if she physically cheated on you, but I'm not gonna go into the obvious details and physical giveaways that would tell you that. And looking at another reply, id she use you and then discard you? Really? I didn't get that out of your OP at all.
A career life for a woman is a whole different situation than it is for a man, even today. If someone else is finding her that attractive, you are a lucky man, indeed. Appreciate her for her mind, her psyche, her integrity, her sexuality and her body, and support her and provide understanding and compassion, and I can almost guarantee you, you'll never have a single worry about her cheating.
The best part of this is it sounds like you are both keeping an honest, though difficult and sometimes painful, dialogue going on. That improves your chances at a successful and long lasting relationship exponentially. Even when we love someone with all our heart, it doesn't mean we stop being attracted to other people. That isn't cheating, though. Flirting and enjoying the fact that you are attractive to other people, still, than just your mate, is a necessity imho to keeping a healthy sexuality alive and well in your committed relationship.
Hang in there. You clearly love her. But understand that a lot of this issue hasn't a single thing to do with her or cheating. It's just the landscape of being a career woman in a man's world, quite bluntly. If the dude is resorting to sending her porn, it's pretty pathetic. In my experience, porn isn't what trips a woman's trigger, usually, That visual aspect of sex is much more male engrained..... He probably sent her the porn because she was constantly rebuffing his advances....
originally posted by: eletheia
Trust is the most important part of any relationship!
Every woman has her own personal line in the sand that she not prepared to cross
and every one of them different.
I can empathise with the situation in the OP as I have been in the same situation
as the fiancee (due to various positions I have held) many, many times.
Having said that .... i bantered, flirted and used everything to my advantage
never crossing my personal line or allowing anyone over it, I cant tell you how
many hands I have removed from my person and how many lunges ended up in
anothers embarrassment.
On one occassion at a conference of approx 100 salesman and five or six females
(of which I was one) I walked into the after dinner entertainment which was a
film...what I saw was.... porn! ... I walked straight out, that was part of my line
that I was not prepared to cross, to compromise my integrity.
I have lost/left jobs to keep my line in the sand and integrity intact.
Every woman sets her own standards.
He probably sent her the porn because she was constantly rebuffing his advances....
An attractive woman learns how to use a males stupidity to survive in a male orientated work place by using his egocentric immaturity against himself!