It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

BREAKING: Early Voters Report Voting Machine Manipulation In Texas!

page: 7
49
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 06:11 PM
link   
a reply to: shawmanfromny

It is Hard to Switch Votes on Paper Ballots , Electronic Voting Machines Will Always be Suspect .




posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 06:22 PM
link   
If those things are rigged why did the Texas which is controlled by the GOP get those Voting Machines?



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 06:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

You seem to be under the illusion that there is a difference between the DNC and the GOP at the levels at which such decisions are made.

There is not.

They are two halves of the same coin, and they are on their side which is not our side. If you still pray at the alter of partisan politics, you won't be able to discern that there is not one iota of difference between the GOP and the DNC once you get to the levels where power rather than $$$ matters.


Walden "Wally" O'Dell, chairman of the board and chief executive of Diebold, was a long-time funder of Republican candidates. In September 2003, he held a packed $1,000-per-head GOP fundraiser at his 10,800-square-foot mansion Cotswold Manor in Upper Arlington, Ohio. He was feted as a guest at then-President George W. Bush's Texas ranch, joining a cadre of “Pioneers and Rangers” who pledged to raise more than $100,000 for the Bush reelection campaign.


source

If Trump is legitimate, then there is a reason several top GOP names have said that they are voting Hillary.

They're all in on the shenanigans together, to one degree or another. Hillary is as hawkish as Bush was and will have us at war with Russia within 1 - 2 years of her taking the White House.

If Trump is what he's portraying himself to be, I could see them giving him a Kennedy treatment if he doesn't heed the warning all presidents get since that death in the form of video form another angle. Hillary already knows what's in that footage and is playing the game so they (TPTB "they" at that) don't worry about her.
edit on 26-10-2016 by jadedANDcynical because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 06:55 PM
link   
Check this out



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 07:21 PM
link   
a reply to: shawmanfromny

Why doesn't the Government own the voting machines in the first place? It's dodgy that a private corporation can own and operate these machines when corps have such a vested interest in the outcome of the race



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 07:24 PM
link   
These machines remind me of slot machines: the odds are always in favour of the casino



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 10:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Soros doesn't own US voting machines.

Period.


You are spreading disinformation over a technicality.

Soros doesn't own Smartmatic, but the person who owns Smartmatic is heavily linked to Soros and his foundations which want Hillary Clinton elected...

Smartmatic is owned by Lord Mark Malloch-Brown. Malloch-Brown was part of Soros Advisory Committee on Bosnia in 1993–94. In May 2007 Malloch-Brown was appointed as vice-president of Soros' Quantum Fund. Also in May 2007 Malloch-Brown was named vice-chairman of Soros Fund Management and the Open Society Institute.

Mark Malloch Brown, Baron Malloch-Brown

We know as a matter of fact that Soros, and his foundation are funding Clinton, and have gone as far as making false news to force his agenda, including getting Clinton elected.

We know from the wikileaks that DNC officials have been using, among other tactics, oversampling to maximize what they can get out of their media polling...



...
----- Original Message ----- From: tmatzzie@gmail.com
To: georgerakis@gmail.com ; Andy Meyer
Sent: Thu Jan 10 21:21:07 2008
Subject: Meet and polling design
Hey, when can we meet? I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling. -Tom

(emailid/26551)

There are reports of ballots being stolen from mailboxes.



But of course, you and other "some others" don't care if your candidate is being helped by rigged elections...




edit on 26-10-2016 by ElectricUniverse because: add link.

edit on 26-10-2016 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comment.



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 11:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: shawmanfromny
a reply to: Sillyolme

Check out the other links pal...Are you and Gryphon66 related?



No just redneck inbreet
LOL



posted on Oct, 27 2016 @ 07:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Gryphon66

No one said that Soros "owns" voting machines.

Soros has influence over the manufacture of voting machines.
This is still a big problem.

I won't speak for others...but here is where it is today. It has been proven to me (not that I didn't know) that the left will lie, cheat, steal, commit crimes, kill, etc. to get their way. We have all seen the videos, the emails, the discussions, etc. The left, quite simply can not be trusted with ANYTHING and have gained that factual reputation with their own actions.

So...I don't care if the son of Soro's barber's daughter knows a woman from High School whose adopted son went to school for voting machine training and has been missing and presumed dead for the last eight years...THAT is even enough reason for concern.

The left OWNS the reputation they now wear. No one forced them, no one is lying about them and they can't even deny it (though they will) without looking like idiots and even greater liars. ANY...and I mean ANY sign of possibility of voting machine or voter fraud will be believed by myself and the right because of the history of proven actions by the left.

The left has EARNED the brand they wear. Guilty UNTIL proven innocent.

edit on 10/27/2016 by WeAreAWAKE because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 27 2016 @ 07:48 AM
link   
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

It's certainly true that any and all suspicions of voter fraud should be taken seriously. There is simply too much resistance to making it harder to cheat to dismiss the possibility of voter fraud that is significant enough to swing an election. With technology and communications today it is quite easy to make an election 100% robust and tamper free, but for some reason there is a reluctance to make it so.
edit on 27/10/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 27 2016 @ 07:56 AM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Your last point is profound and true. Hillary Clinton fanboys and girls do not care at all if the election is stolen by voter fraud. I rather suspect they would encourage it if they thought that was the only way of winning.



posted on Oct, 27 2016 @ 10:51 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth



Hillary Clinton fanboys and girls do not care at all if the election is stolen by voter fraud.


There's no reason to believe or suggest the election is going to be stolen by voter fraud. That is nothing more than a made-up conspiracy being pushed by Trump and his supporters. Consider it making excuses for losing the election before the election has even taken place.

We witnessed the same tactic just before the Benghazi conclusion and the FBI email investigation.



I rather suspect they would encourage it if they thought that was the only way of winning.


No one is encouraging it. Why do you make things up?

Quite the imagination.



posted on Oct, 27 2016 @ 10:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: buckwhizzle

Stop posting disinformation please.

www.wdsu.com...


In the other thread, that poster claimed someone he knew had taken a picture of that and sent it to him. So, apparently that's a lie...



posted on Oct, 27 2016 @ 10:57 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Voter fraud is a reality. Not only is it possible it is also reported and documented.
We don't know how widespread it is, but again, the means to completely change millions is votes is there. All it takes is the motive and the will and it could be achieved.
Writing it off as something that doesn't exist sounds like a wish rather than based on any knowledge. Of course, if it helps Hillary, I am quite sure you'd be fine with it anyway.



posted on Oct, 27 2016 @ 11:00 AM
link   
I am from Texas. I voted yesterday. I had no problems. If anything, the issue is user error. Sorry octogenarians, no fraud, just bad operators.



posted on Oct, 27 2016 @ 11:06 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth



Voter fraud is a reality. Not only is it possible it is also reported and documented.


True. It's very rare, though.



We don't know how widespread it is, but again, the means to completely change millions is votes is there. All it takes is the motive and the will and it could be achieved.


If it was "widespread" it would be reported and documented, right?



Writing it off as something that doesn't exist sounds like a wish rather than based on any knowledge.


I did not say it doesn't exist. I said it's rare and not even remotely close to being the level of an issue as you are trying to make it, or the level Trump has taken it to.

Like I said, this entire issue is irrelevant, other than it's being used as an excuse for losing before the election takes place.



Of course, if it helps Hillary, I am quite sure you'd be fine with it anyway.


Odd thing to say when you know I do not support Clinton.



posted on Oct, 27 2016 @ 11:17 AM
link   
a reply to: introvert

It is reported and documented, like independents being handed the wrong ballots in California during the DNC primaries, after being trained to do so.

What I assume you mean is that no official source has confirmed that it is an issue beyond a few isolated cases. If such official sources are corrupted or compromised then I would expect them to cover it up. Given the levels of corruption being uncovered, the lies and deceit at all levels of govt (right up to and including the President), I don't think it is logical to assume it's all ok.

You are also missing the bigger issue. At this stage it does not matter whether election fraud swung the vote come Nov 8th. Neither side is going to accept the election and the very worst thing you can do right now is dismiss legitimate fears.

edit on 27/10/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 27 2016 @ 11:24 AM
link   
As predicted, people are already working themselves up into a lather with unproven allegations of voter fraud.



posted on Oct, 27 2016 @ 11:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: introvert

It is reported and documented, like independents being handed the wrong ballots in California during the DNC primaries, after being trained to do so.

What I assume you mean is that no official source has confirmed that it is an issue beyond a few isolated cases. If such official sources are corrupted or compromised then I would expect them to cover it up. Given the levels of corruption being uncovered, the lies and deceit at all levels of govt (right up to and including the President), I don't think it is logical to assume it's all ok.

You are also missing the bigger issue. At this stage it does not matter whether election fraud swung the vote come Nov 8th. Neither side is going to accept the election and the very worst thing you can do right now is dismiss legitimate fears.


What people mean is that of all the cases of voter fraud investigated in courts, there has never been a case of widespread voter fraud identified.



posted on Oct, 27 2016 @ 11:43 AM
link   
a reply to: gmoneystunt

You really have no issue with the video title "How Soros Tampers your choice"?

You understand it's the touchscreen alone in that video altering his choice?

I wasn't aware Soros was responsible for such enormous fraud!

In all seriousness, Soros probably doesn't even know a single line of code.

Blaming him for that issue is like blaming Steve Jobs for your iPhone exploding.

Yeah he's the 'head' or whatever, but you really think it was 'designed' that way? Why would it clearly SHOW you it's selecting the other choice? Wouldn't it work better if he didn't add the "Are you sure?" button?
edit on 27-10-2016 by imjack because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
49
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join