It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Walden "Wally" O'Dell, chairman of the board and chief executive of Diebold, was a long-time funder of Republican candidates. In September 2003, he held a packed $1,000-per-head GOP fundraiser at his 10,800-square-foot mansion Cotswold Manor in Upper Arlington, Ohio. He was feted as a guest at then-President George W. Bush's Texas ranch, joining a cadre of “Pioneers and Rangers” who pledged to raise more than $100,000 for the Bush reelection campaign.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Soros doesn't own US voting machines.
----- Original Message ----- From: firstname.lastname@example.org
To: email@example.com ; Andy Meyer
Sent: Thu Jan 10 21:21:07 2008
Subject: Meet and polling design
Hey, when can we meet? I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling. -Tom
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Gryphon66
No one said that Soros "owns" voting machines.
Soros has influence over the manufacture of voting machines.
This is still a big problem.
Hillary Clinton fanboys and girls do not care at all if the election is stolen by voter fraud.
I rather suspect they would encourage it if they thought that was the only way of winning.
Voter fraud is a reality. Not only is it possible it is also reported and documented.
We don't know how widespread it is, but again, the means to completely change millions is votes is there. All it takes is the motive and the will and it could be achieved.
Writing it off as something that doesn't exist sounds like a wish rather than based on any knowledge.
Of course, if it helps Hillary, I am quite sure you'd be fine with it anyway.
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: introvert
It is reported and documented, like independents being handed the wrong ballots in California during the DNC primaries, after being trained to do so.
What I assume you mean is that no official source has confirmed that it is an issue beyond a few isolated cases. If such official sources are corrupted or compromised then I would expect them to cover it up. Given the levels of corruption being uncovered, the lies and deceit at all levels of govt (right up to and including the President), I don't think it is logical to assume it's all ok.
You are also missing the bigger issue. At this stage it does not matter whether election fraud swung the vote come Nov 8th. Neither side is going to accept the election and the very worst thing you can do right now is dismiss legitimate fears.