It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

is the movie "Tommy boy" proof of the mandela effect?

page: 2
5
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 02:11 AM
link   
No.




posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 03:09 AM
link   
Don't look for proof. you simple cannot convince people that the mandela effect is real eventually you get flamed one way or another. There are more movies/clips that 'proof' that there is more to the mandela effect than meets the eye.



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 03:19 AM
link   
a reply to: frenchfries




Don't look for proof.




posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 03:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: frenchfries
Don't look for proof. you simple cannot convince people that the mandela effect is real eventually you get flamed one way or another. There are more movies/clips that 'proof' that there is more to the mandela effect than meets the eye.


Can someone explain to me how only certain things can change?? OK let's say star wars line changed but in thr movie only the one line. Yet other refrences do not change like people claim with this movie. So why would one refrence change but not another? DOES NO ONE SEE THe PROBLEM A TIME LINE CHANGE WOULD EFFECT THE WHOLE TIMELINE. in fact it would change thr whole movie not just one lin in the movie as well. It's not going to change only one thing and leave every thing else alone and of it were true there wold never be proof unless you could travel to another timeline and bring back proof. You can't find proof in a timeline that was altered since in that timeline everything would have been altered.



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 03:47 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Really ? .... Peter Pan ? What exactly do you mean ?
Squachin a mandeler or a flatearther is kinda easy isn't it ?



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 03:57 AM
link   
a reply to: frenchfries

You said it, right?

Admit it.



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 03:59 AM
link   


Can someone explain to me how only certain things can change?? OK let's say star wars line changed but in thr movie only the one line.


Well I can't sorry! But what I do know is that I do remember some things different. Look I'm not saying that I know what ME is if any I'm rather intrigued by the effect.



DOES NO ONE SEE THe PROBLEM A TIME LINE CHANGE WOULD EFFECT THE WHOLE TIMELINE.


This implies that we actually know what a timeline is. We don't even know what time is ? If time is a dimension why can't I stand still in that dimension like I can in space.



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 04:04 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

lol so I admit !
But hey me thinks there no bugs in your home ??
I for myself like bugs and consider myself a bug too. All part of Genesis.... (waiting for funny vid



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 04:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
It's actually proof that the "Mandela effect" is nonsense.


I come from a timeline where Phage used to talk about technical science stuff.

I don't see that much anymore.

Mandela Effect! And no explanations like "but nobody talks about astronomy anymore" are sufficient.

CERN is really changing things.



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 04:25 AM
link   
a reply to: frenchfries

ME is much better a hypothesis than flat earth theory.

You see, IF ME effect was real than it's nearly impossible to prove because the original facts were altered and only memory and circumstantial evidence exists which will forever leave us in doubt.

But flat earth cannot sufficiently explain meteorites or even comets, because it inevitably has to invoke fallen angels yet I've seen a meteor fall and verified it was an actual rock.

Food for thought...



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 04:37 AM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr

It doesn't necessarily have to change anything, and so only one minor change can be cited to "support" the hypothesis. There is no requirement everything has to change.

C3PO got a silver colored leg tho it was supposedly originally gold, so you do have more than one alteration. It's all randomized.

Let's say the Universe is a computerized holographic matrix, it's like someone is blindly hacking the program and they are sloppy and largely ineffective.

But if it is a matrix, how do I know it's not me hacking it? I admit I tried. I wasn't trying to destroy the timeline though.

Or maybe it's the Admin having a lil fun? Or maybe the popular belief it's CERN is close?

Or maybe, just maybe, it's completely unfounded and a result of bad memory and the modern pharmaceutical industry and water pollution screwing our brains up?

Anyways, I admit I'm fascinated by the possibilities yet I am always dissatisfied by the lack of enough new material to keep me interested very long.



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 04:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: frenchfries
Look I'm not saying that I know what ME is if any I'm rather intrigued by the effect.


Everyone says this yet they ignore all the rational answers and choose to believe they have the most useless superpower ever conceived of.

The problem is that looking into how memory works is really hard and complicated, even for the experts.
Watching Tommy Boy is equally hard but not that complicated.

People thought they knew better than Mr Berenstain on how to spell his name in the 30's and they still do now.



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 04:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

I disagree, every super power has it's uses. You just have to learn how to use it.

Like when Forgetmenot helped Cable and the X Force figure out who was watching them. Everyone really needs to read that series it was awesome.



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 05:13 AM
link   
It makes more sense being "no" rather than "Luke", if I remember correctly, the scene was something like:

Luke: "He told me you killed my father"
DV: "NO.....I am your father"

Why would he say "Luke I am your father" in that kind of scenario?

No Mandela effect, just Chinese whispers.



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 05:19 AM
link   
a reply to: reldra




Your posts are not really helping.


Hahaha, hidden numerology as well now; some are desperate to prove the Mandela effect, pick a number add infinity to it. blah blah blah



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 06:32 AM
link   
In my reality, Vader said "Who is your daddy and what does he do?" but in this timeline, that line has been co-opted by something called a Schwarzenegger.
edit on 26-10-2016 by Excallibacca because: horrible spelling



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 08:09 AM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash



Food for thought...



Well FE is just way to far fetched (for me). But I still respect people if they adhere to that hypothesis.
On the other hand I was 'infected' by mandela a long time ago. In my view mandela is as far fetched as Flatearth but somewhat more plausible



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 09:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: Belcastro
i dont see the point of having luke i am your father in the movie at all unless thats how it really was once.


This has already been explained.

In the 100s (or perhaps thousands) of parody scenes such as this, "No, I am your father" was replaced with "Luke, I am your father" for a few reasons:

1) The latter makes sense on its own as a complete movie reference, whereas the former does not.
2) There was actually Star Wars merchandise with both wordings, for the same reason -- some merchandise had a picture to supplement the words, whereas others did not.
edit on 26-10-2016 by Greggers because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 10:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Greggers

This is why people keep believing stupid theories.

Sorry, but you're wrong here and strengthening the delusions of those who think they have superpowers.

These weren't purposefully replaced in parodies. The people who made the parodies just made the same mistake because of the same reason everyone else made the mistake.

Tricky things make our brain hurt so we simplify it. We either remove stuff (like a row of seats with JFK) to make it simpler. Change stuff (like correcting Forrest Gump's past tense quoting), or add stuff (I'm not looking up an example of this, it'll be somewhere tho).

THINK YOU YOU CAN'T BE FOOLED is a good example of this.



posted on Oct, 26 2016 @ 10:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar
a reply to: Greggers

This is why people keep believing stupid theories.

Sorry, but you're wrong here and strengthening the delusions of those who think they have superpowers.

These weren't purposefully replaced in parodies. The people who made the parodies just made the same mistake because of the same reason everyone else made the mistake.

Tricky things make our brain hurt so we simplify it. We either remove stuff (like a row of seats with JFK) to make it simpler. Change stuff (like correcting Forrest Gump's past tense quoting), or add stuff (I'm not looking up an example of this, it'll be somewhere tho).

THINK YOU YOU CAN'T BE FOOLED is a good example of this.



What the hell are you talking about?

I've been in tons of these threads, always arguing in favor of the fallability of human memory.

In my previous post, I gave shorthand explanations that could contribute to errors in encoding or recalling such memories.

Although clearly the merchandise decision was not a mistake -- it was a calculated business decision made specifically because "Luke, I am your father" is sometimes a better stand-alone quote.
edit on 26-10-2016 by Greggers because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
5
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join