It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: FuggleHop
a reply to: DrStevenBrule
Don't be silly. Obama didn't "start" anything Orwellian. He started affordable health care in the backassward USA (oooh, how spooky is that!).
WASHINGTON (AP) — Premiums will go up sharply next year under President Barack Obama's health care law, and many consumers will be down to just one insurer, the administration confirmed Monday. That's sure to stoke another "Obamacare" controversy days before a presidential election.
Before taxpayer-provided subsidies, premiums for a midlevel benchmark plan will increase an average of 25 percent across the 39 states served by the federally run online market, according to a report from the Department of Health and Human Services. Some states will see much bigger jumps, others less.
Moreover, about 1 in 5 consumers will only have plans from a single insurer to pick from, after major national carriers such as UnitedHealth Group, Humana and Aetna scaled back their roles.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: TheBulk
So, the press is ok now acting as the propaganda arm of the Democrat party and the political left?
First off all, they are not. The ones that were conservative or liberal before, still are.
This is not about that.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Well with proof from all the leaked emails from various places, I would say Trump's "opponent" has already been doing the 1984 thing.
This CNN article is a perfect example of another rubber band stretched and broken from dry rot.
originally posted by: reldra
I am trying to make this an email free zone. Please xuen?
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: xuenchen
Well with proof from all the leaked emails from various places, I would say Trump's "opponent" has already been doing the 1984 thing.
This CNN article is a perfect example of another rubber band stretched and broken from dry rot.
I am trying to make this an email free zone. Please xuen?
It is not just the 1990 video. On it's own that is nothing. I have compared it to the present.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: reldra
I am trying to make this an email free zone. Please xuen?
LOL! So taking this with your earlier comment of "global establishment isn't part of the OP" comment, it seems that you're essentially saying "Hey, if you only look at this the way I am, you'll agree with me." OK, reldra... :rolleyes
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: xuenchen
Well with proof from all the leaked emails from various places, I would say Trump's "opponent" has already been doing the 1984 thing.
This CNN article is a perfect example of another rubber band stretched and broken from dry rot.
I am trying to make this an email free zone. Please xuen?
It is not just the 1990 video. On it's own that is nothing. I have compared it to the present.
So sorry !!
I was just addressing the topic as you mentioned Trump's opponent.
By the way, what could Trump do as President to stop all his criticisms in the MSM ?
What exactly are you so scared of ?
originally posted by: reldra
No I am not. There are plenty of places here to talk about the latest email drop and the NWO/TPTB.
If you want to disagree, please disagree about Trump. Disagree that he will not move against the media if President. That sort of thing.
He has said many times that if he becomes President he will take action against 'the media'. Pretty broad statement.
That is what is being discussed. It is the topic at hand in this space.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: reldra
I don't know she is coordinating with the press.
and of course I deny ignorance.
LOL.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: reldra
No I am not. There are plenty of places here to talk about the latest email drop and the NWO/TPTB.
If you want to disagree, please disagree about Trump. Disagree that he will not move against the media if President. That sort of thing.
He has said many times that if he becomes President he will take action against 'the media'. Pretty broad statement.
That is what is being discussed. It is the topic at hand in this space.
My point is the media isn't a free and independent media. Given that, one of the reasons I'm voting for him is because the media NEEDS to be kissed by a cleansing flame. The owned dregs and puppets of the globalist establishment need to be chased out with torches and pitchforks and replaced with honest to goodness independent journalists.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: reldra
it is more free than most places in the world.
We're not in "most places in the world" are we? What's wrong with being #1 again?
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
It can be argued that some of todays "Media" is no longer the Free Press, they are bought and paid for so no Freedom of the Press constitutional protections are in place and never were for paid political advocates. Collusion with Hillary's campaign forfeits their rights.
"I think you are spoiled. We have everything from CNN to Conservative Daily review (I think that is a real one). " Lol, it is a real one and looks as crazy as it sounds. but we have it to look at if we so choose.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: reldra
it is more free than most places in the world.
We're not in "most places in the world" are we? What's wrong with being #1 again?
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: reldra
it is more free than most places in the world.
We're not in "most places in the world" are we? What's wrong with being #1 again?
Being #1 is a cardinal sin against diversity!