It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I’ve had meetings in mysterious rooms far out in the desert. I’ve had meetings at the highest levels of NASA. I have had conversations at research centers, think tanks, and even on the phone connected to secret facilities. I’ve been introduced to a man whom I call “the Scientist,” and another whom I call “the General.” And there are many more of whom I cannot say much about, but some have become true friends, and all have become close counselors. Each of these men has all held, or currently holds, the highest offices of the military and scientific elite. The point is, I have done it. I have assembled a team of men and women “in the know.” And they all believe I am doing something of value, something worth their time and yours.[Sekret Machines – Kindle Locations 95-100]
very, very aware – as he was in charge of all of the stuff. When Roswell crashed, they shipped it to the laboratory at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. General McCasland was in charge of that exact laboratory up to a couple years ago.
Sekret Machines scratches at the surface of “who do” we trust with our classified technology – certainly our adversaries are aware of our undertakings, as they are doing the same, but what of our citizens, our politicians, even our own military. Tom DeLonge and A.J. Hartley create a convincing narrative describing the “cat and mouse” game that is timeless between strategic adversaries. It has existed under the sea, on the surface of the earth and in its skies, why wouldn’t we believe it occurs in space. Our military leaders have been saying space is a contested environment for years now, perhaps we should believe them! -Maj. Gen. Michael J. Carey
From:[email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: 2016-01-25 16:04
Subject: General McCasland
He mentioned he's a "skeptic", he's not. I've been working with him for four months. I just got done giving him a four hour presentation on the entire project a few weeks ago. Trust me, the advice is already been happening on how to do all this. He just has to say that out loud, but he is very, very aware- as he was in charge of all of the stuff. When Roswell crashed, they shipped it to the laboratory at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. General McCasland was in charge of that exact laboratory up to a couple years ago. He not only knows what I'm trying to achieve, he helped assemble my advisory team. He's a very important man.
Best, Tom DeLonge TOM DELONGE | FOUNDER
originally posted by: darkbake
a reply to: thesungod
Why does everyone e-mail this Podesta guy? Even Tom DeLouge?
She should have died hereafter;
There would have been a time for such a word.
— To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury
Signifying nothing.
originally posted by: schuyler
Yup. So there are a couple of issues.
1.) What we have is the disclosure of the 'sekret general's' name. Who was keeping it from us? DeLonge. By the Wikileaks leak, the name was exposed. That's all we've got here. The name is new to us, but that's only because DeLonge withheld it from us.
2.) Yes, it sounds very much like Greer and any number of others that have come along over the years. The M.O. is the same. A "secret group" wants "Disclosure" and is "working toward it" but the "time is not right." Those elements are always in the picture.
3.) In the case of Greer, I believe he is part of the problem. I've studied him. I have a book-length manuscript on him about ready to go. There's no doubt in my mind that at least some of what he has said, if not most of it. is total BS. To me the guy is a charlatan and I've got a whole lot of proof.
BUT.....
4.) this M.O. has ALSO been used as disinformation. I am not a fan of disinfo and when people claim it, I initially doubt it, but we know for certain it has been used by Richard Doty in compromising Paul Bennewitz. We know because he admitted it and wrote a book about it so we're not speculating here. We also have the testimony of William Moore in this case because Moore admitted to playing at being a secret agent to "get closer to the truth." It didn't work out for him because he lost credibility in the UFO research community and basically quit the field. he 'spilled the beans" about his involvement in a now famous Mufon Conference in Las Vegas. But whatever you think about Moore, he was duped. AFOSI, i.e. Doty, got a 'twofer' on this deal. They made Paul Bennewitz go crazy and they discredited William Moore.
5.) And that brings us to DeLonge. I believe he is also being duped, and what follows is my argument. DeLonge has had a lifelong interest in UFOs, but he is not particularly well-versed in the history. He tends to take UFO and conspiracy information at face value, so anything he reads is "the truth." When you hear him talk, such as on Larry King, he's not particularly erudite and often expresses simplistic answers about the UFO phenomenon. He's "read some stuff" to be sure, but he's no expert in the field.
But he has a LOT of money and can indulge himself in the pursuit of this. Really, blink and his other ventures have given him tens of millions. He can afford to go anywhere at any time and meet with anyone. So he is. I'd do it, too, if I had bucks like that. I don't begrudge him his bucks and I can't blame him for what he is doing--even if he doesn't know what he is doing. And that is what has happened. He has inserted himself into the spider web and the spider has said, Sure! Come a little closer!" And the Spiders (tm) are using him to divert all of us who BELIEVE in Disclosure with all our hearts.
Because OF COURSE there are black triangles. OF COURSE there is advanced technology, perhaps anti-gravity based. They are ours. But that doesn't mean: Space Invaders. So if the guys in charge of these secrets want to divert us from the truth, leading us in that direction assures we will be seen as cooks, and mission accomplished. Tom DeLonge doesn't know.
It's worked before. why wouldn't it work again? Just my opinion and a working theory.
originally posted by: schuyler
Yup. So there are a couple of issues.
1.) What we have is the disclosure of the 'sekret general's' name. Who was keeping it from us? DeLonge. By the Wikileaks leak, the name was exposed. That's all we've got here. The name is new to us, but that's only because DeLonge withheld it from us.
2.) Yes, it sounds very much like Greer and any number of others that have come along over the years. The M.O. is the same. A "secret group" wants "Disclosure" and is "working toward it" but the "time is not right." Those elements are always in the pi
3.) In the case of Greer, I believe he is part of the problem. I've studied him. I have a book-length manuscript on him about ready to go. There's no doubt in my mind that at least some of what he has said, if not most of it. is total BS. To me the guy is a charlatan and I've got a whole lot of proof.
BUT.....
4.) this M.O. has ALSO been used as disinformation. I am not a fan of disinfo and when people claim it, I initially doubt it, but we know for certain it has been used by Richard Doty in compromising Paul Bennewitz. We know because he admitted it and wrote a book about it so we're not speculating here. We also have the testimony of William Moore in this case because Moore admitted to playing at being a secret agent to "get closer to the truth." It didn't work out for him because he lost credibility in the UFO research community and basically quit the field. he 'spilled the beans" about his involvement in a now famous Mufon Conference in Las Vegas. But whatever you think about Moore, he was duped. AFOSI, i.e. Doty, got a 'twofer' on this deal. They made Paul Bennewitz go crazy and they discredited William Moore.
5.) And that brings us to DeLonge. I believe he is also being duped, and what follows is my argument. DeLonge has had a lifelong interest in UFOs, but he is not particularly well-versed in the history. He tends to take UFO and conspiracy information at face value, so anything he reads is "the truth." When you hear him talk, such as on Larry King, he's not particularly erudite and often expresses simplistic answers about the UFO phenomenon. He's "read some stuff" to be sure, but he's no expert in the field.
But he has a LOT of money and can indulge himself in the pursuit of this. Really, blink and his other ventures have given him tens of millions. He can afford to go anywhere at any time and meet with anyone. So he is. I'd do it, too, if I had bucks like that. I don't begrudge him his bucks and I can't blame him for what he is doing--even if he doesn't know what he is doing. And that is what has happened. He has inserted himself into the spider web and the spider has said, Sure! Come a little closer!" And the Spiders (tm) are using him to divert all of us who BELIEVE in Disclosure with all our hearts.
Because OF COURSE there are black triangles. OF COURSE there is advanced technology, perhaps anti-gravity based. They are ours. But that doesn't mean: Space Invaders. So if the guys in charge of these secrets want to divert us from the truth, leading us in that direction assures we will be seen as cooks, and mission accomplished. Tom DeLonge doesn't know.
It's worked before. why wouldn't it work again? Just my opinion and a working theory.
originally posted by: schuyler
Yup. So there are a couple of issues.
1.) What we have is the disclosure of the 'sekret general's' name. Who was keeping it from us? DeLonge. By the Wikileaks leak, the name was exposed. That's all we've got here. The name is new to us, but that's only because DeLonge withheld it from us.
2.) Yes, it sounds very much like Greer and any number of others that have come along over the years. The M.O. is the same. A "secret group" wants "Disclosure" and is "working toward it" but the "time is not right." Those elements are always in the picture.
3.) In the case of Greer, I believe he is part of the problem. I've studied him. I have a book-length manuscript on him about ready to go. There's no doubt in my mind that at least some of what he has said, if not most of it. is total BS. To me the guy is a charlatan and I've got a whole lot of proof.
BUT.....
4.) this M.O. has ALSO been used as disinformation. I am not a fan of disinfo and when people claim it, I initially doubt it, but we know for certain it has been used by Richard Doty in compromising Paul Bennewitz. We know because he admitted it and wrote a book about it so we're not speculating here. We also have the testimony of William Moore in this case because Moore admitted to playing at being a secret agent to "get closer to the truth." It didn't work out for him because he lost credibility in the UFO research community and basically quit the field. he 'spilled the beans" about his involvement in a now famous Mufon Conference in Las Vegas. But whatever you think about Moore, he was duped. AFOSI, i.e. Doty, got a 'twofer' on this deal. They made Paul Bennewitz go crazy and they discredited William Moore.
5.) And that brings us to DeLonge. I believe he is also being duped, and what follows is my argument. DeLonge has had a lifelong interest in UFOs, but he is not particularly well-versed in the history. He tends to take UFO and conspiracy information at face value, so anything he reads is "the truth." When you hear him talk, such as on Larry King, he's not particularly erudite and often expresses simplistic answers about the UFO phenomenon. He's "read some stuff" to be sure, but he's no expert in the field.
But he has a LOT of money and can indulge himself in the pursuit of this. Really, blink and his other ventures have given him tens of millions. He can afford to go anywhere at any time and meet with anyone. So he is. I'd do it, too, if I had bucks like that. I don't begrudge him his bucks and I can't blame him for what he is doing--even if he doesn't know what he is doing. And that is what has happened. He has inserted himself into the spider web and the spider has said, Sure! Come a little closer!" And the Spiders (tm) are using him to divert all of us who BELIEVE in Disclosure with all our hearts.
Because OF COURSE there are black triangles. OF COURSE there is advanced technology, perhaps anti-gravity based. They are ours. But that doesn't mean: Space Invaders. So if the guys in charge of these secrets want to divert us from the truth, leading us in that direction assures we will be seen as cooks, and mission accomplished. Tom DeLonge doesn't know.
It's worked before. why wouldn't it work again? Just my opinion and a working theory.
originally posted by: Assassin82
I'm stationed at Wright Patterson AFB and would love to know where it's at. I know there are underground facilities. In random open fields on base you'll see exhaust vents coming up out of the middle of nowhere. I've worked on Area A and Area B. NASIC is on Area A. If one were to put money on a location where it's housed, that'd probably be as good of a wager as anywhere. There's a ton of civilian research on base, and even more compartmentalizations throughout the base.
Tom seems to be gaining a lot of positive momentum in his efforts for disclosure. I'll be interested to see where this goes.
originally posted by: 191stMIDET
originally posted by: Assassin82
I'm stationed at Wright Patterson AFB and would love to know where it's at. I know there are underground facilities. In random open fields on base you'll see exhaust vents coming up out of the middle of nowhere. I've worked on Area A and Area B. NASIC is on Area A. If one were to put money on a location where it's housed, that'd probably be as good of a wager as anywhere. There's a ton of civilian research on base, and even more compartmentalizations throughout the base.
Tom seems to be gaining a lot of positive momentum in his efforts for disclosure. I'll be interested to see where this goes.
Come on, I seriously doubt the Roswell remains are still at Wright Patterson. If this narrative is true there is NO WAY the USAF is going to allow something THAT classified to remain in a location that has been compromised. My two cents.