It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As you and I discussed Friday, we are still identifying activities hrc could be involved in once she leaves the State Department. We are presuming there will be a foundation piece but there are obviously other things and we are still in the early stages of that decision-making process. As cdm reminded me today, as there is a review going on about the nature of business that can take place on CF property, the outcome will presumably affect the nature of the office hrc will be able to have at CF. Since in the near term, we are talking about a small staff that could be handling potentially more than just charitable activity, we may have to be elsewhere. Plus we still have the logistical concern that her daily commute to water street will be challenging.
originally posted by: Socrato
Could it be that Assange might turn himself in soon knowing that Trump is going to win and will then pardon him?
From: Date: Apr 21, 2015 5:38 PM Subject: RE: hello To: Cc: Please do. I put in a call to Kendall yesterday but they said he was out of town til Weds or Thurs. I would love to talk to one or both of them about this. Many tks for any encouragement you could offer to that end. Rgds mh *From:* John Podesta [mailto:email@example.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, April 21, 2015 5:29 PM *To:* Hosenball, Mark J. (Reuters News) *Cc:* John Podesta *Subject:* Re: hello Mark, That's in a different lane with Kendall and Cheryl. Mind if I share this email with them? John On Apr 21, 2015 5:11 PM, wrote: I have run across a rather interesting document which outlines in detail the principal current objectives of the House Benghazi Committee, and was wondering if you might have a minute or two to discuss this. If you are anywhere near 1333 H in next day or two I might even show the document to you (I’m out on Thursday, however) though I am reluctant to hand out copies at this stage. It is a document which raises some questions about the bona fides of the committee’s investigation, rather than about anything specific a certain former SecState might have done. If this is something that you would not want to get involved in, if you had any alternative ideas as to who I ought to speak to I would welcome them. Hope all is well etc. All best & regards mh
a reply to: digital01anarchy
I would disregard any of the new emails as not being valid at this point in time. Wikileaks has been acting strange in their twitter and website responses.