1. Who is behind the Corporate NWO?
The banker-financier families of the Old World Order (OWO) - historically, the world’s real rulers. Monarchs like kings and emperors, or tyrants and
corporations are just fronts for the real powers 'behind the thrones.'
For millenia, a few banking families controlled the world by owning monarchs’ debts – they’re not royalty but they controlled royalty,
and the world, by keeping kings in debt. They use money – through debt – to manipulate nations and policy. Their own money and power are passed
along by inheritance. Besides accumulating wealth and controlling the world, their supreme goal is to preserve the family line and fortune – and
their lineages go back farther than written Western history. They were in Jerusalem in 1 A.D., bankrolling the moneylenders Christ threw out of the
temple. One family appeared in the Caucasus around 1400. They controlled Europe by the 1500’s. Throughout history they have appeared, like magic,
whenever and wherever a civilization leaped forward from a tribal state. They come to make kings – and they make kings to make money. Financing war
is their bread and butter. By creating debt for wars, they ensure that most profits from most human activity end up in their own pockets.
(c) Lanie Patrick, 2004. Open Access terms.
Names may include Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Warburgs – there is a bloodline hierarchy, and newcomers are lower on the ladder. Frontline puppets are
distinguished from puppeteers, who are blood relatives of OWO/NWO ruling-families.
Note: The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) needs special attention: It was created by a group of British, American, German and Japanese
businessmen and incorporated around 1930 – government officials from each of these nations signed the incorporation papers, which stipulated that
the BIS would keep its deposits even if the signatory nations went to war – and then the BIS financed Britain, Germany, America and
WWII. The UN and World Bank were created to replace the BIS, which was supposed to be dissolved – but never was.
2. What are the NWO’s main goals?
The NWO is a power-play by the OWO to re-establish their rule, and re-create feudal-manorial-type hierarchies that were “disrupted” by
To re-establish the power and control the OWO enjoyed before democracy appeared - and once again, secure the lion's share of the profits
To destroy 1) Democracy's credibility as a legitimate form of government; and 2) Ordinary peoples’ ambitions to govern themselves and
their own affairs.
3. How are the goals being accomplished?
The NWO is business, hardball – so the main strategy is:
A. Neutralize the Competition.
TARGET: Democratic Nationhood.
Modify corporate law to firmly establish corporations as legally equal to nations, independent of kings' charters, and preserve
quasi-governmental privileges and immunities. ...Replace monarchs with Chief Executive Officers (CEO's) and create a 'corporate nobility.' Ie.,
Position executives to replace aristocrats, and corporations to replace nations. Market the NWO as meritocracy over aristocracy.
“Corporations” existed as legal “entities” before feudal times - and were used as fronts by the OWO. Kings granted corporate charters giving
corporations power equal to the monarchy when they operated outside national boundaries. Generally, corporations were used by nations for
colonization, to harvest slaves and natural resources and etc. Corporate holdings were protected by the King’s military, but the corporations had no
social responsibilities and kept most of the profits. However, the monarch held final control: he could take whatever profits he wanted and/or revoke
the corporation's charter.
Several things occurred in the 1700's that threatened the OWO's ultimate control:
1. A king appropriated all the profits from a corporation's trust fund - an alarming precedent that opened the door for other monarchs to do the
2. Scientific discoveries were bringing Biblical claims into question, and threatening to topple the system the OWO used for control - while the OWO
used kings to control money and funnel profits to them, it used religion to control people, mainly by claiming that kings had a 'divine right' to
rule - new science was questioning the very foundations of this claim.
3. Revolutions were happening around the world and monarchies were falling everywhere. The American and French Revolutions were just the tip of the
4. The USA created its own independent monetary system - another threat and alarming precedent.
All of these things motivated the OWO to re-position, regroup, plan for change - and develop the corporate NWO strategy.
(c) Lanie Patrick, 2004. Open Access terms.
In 1812, Thomas Jefferson saw the writing on the wall:
“I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of
strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country.”
Thomas Jefferson, 1812
But Jefferson was fighting a losing battle - by 1850, Ohio and Wisconsin had introduced 'general incorporation' legislation - and a simple license
fee provided corporate sanctuary. In 1862, the UK Companies Act created general incorporation laws in England's United Kingdom. As the Rothschild
Brothers of London wrote in a communiqué to associates in New York June 25, 1863:
“The few who understand the system, will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favors that there will be no opposition from
that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending... will bear its burden without complaint, and
perhaps without suspecting that the system is inimical to their best interests.”
Rothschild Brothers of London communiqué to associates in New York June 25, 1863
Lincoln understood the implications:
“I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. ...corporations have been
enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon
the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.”
Abraham Lincoln, 1864
By 1914, the US Federal Reserve was under NWO control, incorporated in Delaware as the “Federal Reserve Association,” a privately held
“nonprofit religious” entity, File No. 0042817...
Today, a corporation is an “entity” that has the same rights as an individual, the rights of nationhood - and many immunities. It does not have
the same responsibilities or accountability as individuals or nations do. For example, corporations can’t be sent to jail, are not required to hold
democratic elections, and are not bound by international treaties like the Geneva Conventions.
In the OWO, banker-financiers ruled the world through nobles and monarchs; in the NWO, corporations front for the bankers. Either way, the ruling
financier families run the world.
...Without intending it, the mid-nineteenth century reformers unleashed the immortal, omni-competent corporation. ...(the) “revolutionary” effect:
wealth accumulation and concentration. What made general incorporation revolutionary was the understanding of how the limited liability company with
its quasi-governmental privileges and immunities could store and shelter wealth.
* The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea
* The Ambiguous Significance of Corporate Personhood
* The End Of History For Corporate Law
* Citizens over Corporations
* The Corporation
* The Transnational Corporation in History: Lessons for Today?
* 100-Plus Books About Corporations: A Reading List
* articles list
The next stage in establishing the 'system' referred to in the Rothschild memo involves incorporating nations and government agencies - however,
unlike corporations, nations are bound by treaties and other constraints of nationhood, with few of the freedoms or immunities that private
...Incorporate democratic nations, government agencies and departments as "corporate entities." This “levels the playing field.” A
nation that is a corporate entity is legally ‘equal’ to other corporations under international law – rather than legally ‘sovereign’ by
virtue of nationhood. … The “rights of citizenship” left to individual voters are empty – roughly equivalent to having a noncontrolling
The United States of America was incorporated in 1989, as was the Social Security, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, for example. Since the
Federal Reserve was incorporated in 1914, numerous government agencies and departments have been made into corporations, one at a time.
See: “The government is a corporation, and registered in the State of Delaware.”
Verify claims at: www.state.de.us...
(Please look at the end of the first paragraph: "click here for status on the web." From there, at the end of the first paragraph click on "to
receive a status inquiry on line, CLICK HERE." That takes you to 'General Information Name Search.' You must use the incorporated name. The search
box in the top bar does NOT retrieve results.)
Also see: www.abovetopsecret.com...
Post Number: 1006246
NOTE: Investigate Canada and Mexico's corporate status, especially "Team Canada, Inc." (TCI). TCI is pitched as a support to Canadian export,
incorporates nearly 20 government of Canada departments and agencies under one mother corporation - and may be other than it seems.
Secure corporate rights and the right to trade and profit under international law; block equivalent international legislation for
individual civil liberties and rights, human rights, etc.
NOTE: Review international corporate and trade law, especially NAFTA, CAFTA, FTAA; compare to individual protections. Provide Explanation, History,
Status, Impacts, Defense.
Ensure that economically powerful front corporations exist as proxies for formal negotiations between nations and NWO ruling
* Of the 100 largest economies in the world, 51 are corporations while only 49 are countries;
* The world's top 200 corporations account for over a quarter of economic activity on the globe while employing less than one percent of its
* Between 1983 and 1999, the profits of the Top 200 firms grew 362.4 percent, while the number of people they employ grew by only 14.4 percent.
* A full 5 percent of the Top 200s' combined workforce is employed by Wal-Mart, a company notorious for union-busting and widespread use of part-time
workers to avoid paying benefits.
* U.S. corporations dominate the Top 200, with 82 slots (41 percent of the total). Japanese firms are second, with only 41 slots.
* Of the U.S.corporations on the list, 44 did not pay the full standard 35 percent federal corporate tax rate during the period 1996-1998. Seven of
the firms (including the world's largest, General Motors) actually paid less than zero in federal income taxes in 1998 (because of rebates).
NOTE: The really big boys hide their real assets - and most of the world’s wealth is privately held and hidden from view. This chart shows only
those corporations classified as “publicly held,” subject to taxation and positioned to negotiate directly with nations.
Increase nations' debt burdens – and thus, power to control policy and to appropriate the fruits of taxation and national
Eg., Thanks to the Iraq war, the US national debt jumped to $8.2 trillion by November of 2004. Interest payments on the US National Debt are now
larger than some county's economies.
US National Debt Interest Payments:
$ 120,248,160,823.07 (over $120 billion for October, November and December, the first 3 months of Fiscal Year 2005)
$ 321,566,323,971.29 (in 2004)
Also see: The Shrinking US Dollar
Dismantle existent national protections for civil liberties, constitutional rights, etc.; change, modify or bypass other protections.
Investigate and evaluate all new laws etc. - esp. anti-terrorist and "security" legislation, personal bankruptcy laws, constraints on civil
litigation, esp. environmental protections, etc.
LINK - bush breaks law
Restructure National Militaries. Use national militaries primarily for training and domestic policing. Funnel major military
expenditures to private security corporations, use for government funded corporate colonization and protection. Note: Private corporations are not
subject to constraints imposed on nations-militaries through the Geneva Conventions, international treaties etc.
Background. Worth reading, verifying and developing:
Executive Outcomes is the mercenary arm of a vast network of British-South African corporations dealing in gold, diamonds, and oil, primarily, but not
exclusively, in Africa, that come under the umbrella of Strategic Resources Corporation, headquartered in Pretoria, South Africa. Described
universally as an "advance guard of a corporate network that includes mining, oil, and construction companies," Executive Outcomes is active in 13
African countries, including Uganda. For its services, it demands a lien or franchise on the exportable raw resources, particularly mineral wealth, of
the client country--in the same fashion as the British East India Company of the 18th and 19th centuries, which in turn functioned as the "advance
guard" of the British monarchy.
...Executive Outcomes was incorporated offshore, on the Isle of Man, in 1993, by Anthony Buckingham, a British businessman, and Simon Mann, a former
British officer, the [Observer] reported, based on a leak to it from British intelligence. Buckingham is also chief executive of Heritage Oil and Gas,
which in turn is linked to the Canadian firm Ranger Oil. Other firms operating out of the same headquarters in Chelsea Plaza 107, London, include
Branch International Ltd. and Branch Mining Ltd.
...The links between Executive Outcomes and Ranger Oil point to operational ties with the Bronfman family of Canada, whose scion, Edgar Bronfman of
Toronto Broncorp, sits on the board of directors of Ranger. Recently, the Bronfman family merged its mammoth real estate firm, Trizec, with Barrick
Gold, whose senior advisory board includes George Bush.
...The ability of Executive Outcomes to thrive as privatized warlords, it is believed, is in part due to the privatization of U.S. intelligence
services by George Bush, who, as vice president, beginning in 1981, carried out Executive Order 12333, which placed all U.S. intelligence operations
under Bush's personal control.
...Evidence points to Executive Outcomes being a direct and likely the biggest spin-off of the British Special Air Services (SAS), formed in 1941 by
the late Lt. Col. David Stirling. ...The SAS lies outside the British government's official military structure, and is accountable to the
Sovereign Queen only. According to the British Army handbook, the SAS--similar to EO today--is “particularly suited, trained, and equipped for
counter-revolutionary operations,”' specializing in “sabotage,” “assassination,” as well as “liaison with organization, training, and
control of friendly guerrilla forces operating against the common enemy.”
Also see: "New Espionage Branch Delving Into CIA Territory"
more to follow....