i think if theyre being caught doing it in the primaries, then theyre probably getting away with it far more often.
then we got the veritas videos, how do you defend that? ive seen some claims they were being coerced into saying the things they said, without proof
of course, while citing o'keefes previous work. he attempts to catch the politicians in a sting scenario where he encourages them to do or talk about
something illegal. the police do it, the fbi does it, maybe if he offered them a cup of iced tea and told them to take a seat after they said
something incriminating and had chris hansen come out and greet them it would have been more acceptable. what i see though is a distinct effort to
diminish the character of o'keefe while downplaying the felony convictions of bob creamer, whos role at the dnc was specific to hillary's campaign and
also headed 2 additional political organizations whom all worked in some capacity for the hrc campaign. hes clearly a sleeze ball, who cant be
trusted, but all you see on wikipedia or the news articles regarding this story are his carefully worded response to the video, which deny any
wrongdoing and states that the words dont reflect the values of the organizations.
imagine for the latest fbi sting on domestic terrorists if the media allowed the suspects to make statements denying everything, while blaming the fbi
for twisting their words and airing that statement on every channel and doggedly editing the wikipedia entry associated with the event to prominently
display said statement.
the mind reels, it would never happen.
yet here we are in this reality and thats what youre hearing and reading while the stuff in the above videos is probably happening all over the place
but isnt getting caught on camera.
i personally was against most of bernies policy but at least he wasnt a cheating lying crook. as for trump, most of his policies seem good. term
limits, limited lobbying, ban on lobbying for foreign governments, real fair trade these are good things. and if the entire corrupt system is against
him that speaks well of his intentions to me. i think if you read this whole post you would know that i also agree with him and the op, that vote
fraud is real, and serious. any sort of argument against that flies in the face of facts and evidence.
edit on 27-10-2016 by snarfbot because:
(no reason given)
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.