It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Taken together, the studies and reports call for more-aggressive American action to constrain Iran, rein in the chaos in the Middle East and check Russia in Europe.
The studies, which reflect Clinton’s stated views, break most forcefully with Obama on Syria. Virtually all these efforts, including a report released Wednesday by the liberal Center for American Progress, call for stepped-up military action to deter President Bashar al-Assad’s regime and Russian forces in Syria.
SOURCE
the orange one has been bailed out by the house of saud many times, so they definitely have their bases covered.
originally posted by: 727Sky
If you look at HRC's donors ....not counting wall street and defense contractors... Saudi and other Sunni governments...the ones who say "lets fund ISIS miscreants"... They will not rest until they can kick Iran back to it's borders and stop any religious influence they might try to exert over Wahhabi philosophy... IMO
the orange one has been bailed out by the house of saud many times, so they definitely have their bases covered.
originally posted by: 727Sky
If you look at HRC's donors ....not counting wall street and defense contractors... Saudi and other Sunni governments...the ones who say "lets fund ISIS miscreants"... They will not rest until they can kick Iran back to it's borders and stop any religious influence they might try to exert over Wahhabi philosophy... IMO
ri
originally posted by: Profusion
Taken together, the studies and reports call for more-aggressive American action to constrain Iran, rein in the chaos in the Middle East and check Russia in Europe.
The studies, which reflect Clinton’s stated views, break most forcefully with Obama on Syria. Virtually all these efforts, including a report released Wednesday by the liberal Center for American Progress, call for stepped-up military action to deter President Bashar al-Assad’s regime and Russian forces in Syria.
SOURCE
I think this is a big blow to the "cooler heads will prevail" theory. This article is claiming that Clinton's warmongering ways are supported by the majority of the power elite in Washington.
I know some posters on this forum have ignored Clinton's hawkish foreign policy stance because they believe she won't have the authority to implement her plans. I hope the article linked above will be a wake-up call.
I've read speculation that Russia is trying to rush to finish the Syrian war before Clinton becomes POTUS. The future of the entire world may hinge on that.
The studies, which reflect Clinton’s stated views, break most forcefully with Obama on Syria. Virtually all these efforts, including a report released Wednesday by the liberal Center for American Progress, call for stepped-up military action to deter President Bashar al-Assad’s regime and Russian forces in Syria.
The proposed military measures include calls for safe zones
to protect moderate rebels from Syrian and Russian forces. Most of the studies propose limited American airstrikes with cruise missiles to punish Assad if he continues to attack civilians with barrel bombs, as is happening in besieged Aleppo. Obama has staunchly resisted any military action against the Assad regime.