It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

What if the DNC email leaks get Americans killed???

page: 1
6
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:10 AM
link   
Here is an interesting question for people of both ideologies..one raised by republicans during the NSA/Snowden scandal.




What if the DNC/Wikileaks's emails get American citizens and Assets killed??


What if the emails are no longer risking politicial careers, but instead are outing undercover agents and pro American families in foreign countries acting as spies for America??


Does wiki leaks "check it" or just dump them and see what happens??




posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:13 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

If the People Currently Running the Federal Government were Competent in doing their Jobs , Leaks of that Nature would not be a Problem today .



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:16 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

What if Wikileaks emails show that the voting machines in 16 US states are the same kind of machines that were used to rig the elections in Venezuela?



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: JoshuaCox

If the People Currently Running the Federal Government were Competent in doing their Jobs , Leaks of that Nature would not be a Problem today .


How can anyone say this with confidence. All the security in the world isnt ever 100% effective. Me thinks if tptb were "your people" you wouldnt be so cavalier to throw blame to people or offices that you have no idea about.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:18 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

It's not very likely the DNC leaks compromised someone. It's Hillary's server. If that was compromised (Commey said no way to know) and got people killed we would never find out about it or at least not anytime soon. It may be divulged a decade or so later maybe not.....way to damaging for Hillary and anyone else involved. People would want some serious justice.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:18 AM
link   
Shouldn't have been a spy then.

Given the nature of the CIA, I have very little sympathy for their "assets".


edit on -050010am10kam by Ohanka because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:20 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Maybe if our politicians weren't so corrupt they wouldn't have to guilt their citizens into remaining silent when their corruption is discovered.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:21 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

I'm in one of those states, I'll keep you posted.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:22 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

First of all, we have to consider the facts. The facts as they stand are that the vast majority of assets the US government has, in lands currently affected by this ISIS crisis, are actually in the leadership of that group and its affiliate organisations, pulling strings either from the shadows, or at the leading edge of things.

The reality is that these terror groups are largely assets of the US government, have been since the eighties, and will be until all the guns and training and money from the west dry up completely.

So the vast majority of people under threat, will be the very people that your government TELLS you are your enemies, not "innocent" people, who were just trying to report on IS activity in the region, and keep their heads down, or noble rebel types, but full blown, bloodthirsting sociopaths with a taste for overkill and no respect for human life. So leak on.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:23 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Nothing happened to Rapist enabler hillary who is responsible for the deaths of American assets in Benghazi,so why should anything happen to anyone else that is responsible for the deaths of American assets?



The traitorous hag is setting some serious precedents.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:25 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Good question--but if the DNC is discussing things of such a sensitive nature, I think that there would be massively larger problems for many people involved.

We'll have to wait and see, but remember that the Snowden leaks dealt specifically with national security--the DNC doesn't deal in that.

Birds of different feathers.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:31 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

In the grand scheme of things, the way this machine works I wouldn't doubt one bit they would pull a stunt like this. Who can you trust. Maybe they can be your family one day and the next they are total complete strangers.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

Here is an interesting question for people of both ideologies..one raised by republicans during the NSA/Snowden scandal.




What if the DNC/Wikileaks's emails get American citizens and Assets killed??


What if the emails are no longer risking politicial careers, but instead are outing undercover agents and pro American families in foreign countries acting as spies for America??


Does wiki leaks "check it" or just dump them and see what happens??



What if.not leaking the mails gets non americans killed or have their lives effected, say like Haitis minimum wage..... sorry mate, those most affected are most important, cant be bothered over 1 or 2 american officials.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:32 AM
link   
a reply to: LifeMode



It's Hillary's server. If that was compromised (Commey said no way to know)

Hillary's camp going with the 'it was the Russians' story may end being a problem for her.

IF Wikileaks dumps the 33,000 emails as they say they will.... then she will have to admit that the Russians hacked her server... which she denies having happened.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:35 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

Yep. It looks like she wedged her own damn self in between a rock and hard place. I suspect that the little cyber attack we are getting on the east coast will be blamed on Russia.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: JoshuaCox

If the People Currently Running the Federal Government were Competent in doing their Jobs , Leaks of that Nature would not be a Problem today .


There is no ful proof cyber security.

Anti virus stuff is reactive. They write the virility then the developers beat the virus.

So I don't think there is a competency issue with the leaks.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: JoshuaCox

What if Wikileaks emails show that the voting machines in 16 US states are the same kind of machines that were used to rig the elections in Venezuela?





Absolutely..what if it contains both??

Proof the elections are rigged AND lists all of our foreign assets???



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: LifeMode
a reply to: JoshuaCox

It's not very likely the DNC leaks compromised someone. It's Hillary's server. If that was compromised (Commey said no way to know) and got people killed we would never find out about it or at least not anytime soon. It may be divulged a decade or so later maybe not.....way to damaging for Hillary and anyone else involved. People would want some serious justice.




The wiki leaks stuff isn't hillary s server. They are state department emails..

In fact hillarys server might have been the safer of the two lo!



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: LifeMode



It's Hillary's server. If that was compromised (Commey said no way to know)

Hillary's camp going with the 'it was the Russians' story may end being a problem for her.

IF Wikileaks dumps the 33,000 emails as they say they will.... then she will have to admit that the Russians hacked her server... which she denies having happened.



Wiki leaks have not claimed to have hacked hillarys server. No one has proof it was ever hacked.

These are state dept emails.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:45 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

What is so sad is the fact that everyone looks to wikileaks to prove what we already know has been happening to our country. Wikileaks evolved from our own complacency.







 
6
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join